[The effectiveness of surgical compared to nonsurgical treatment of periodontal disease. 1. Molar surfaces. 24-month study].

L Rojas, M Quintana, J J Villavicencio, J Egelberg
{"title":"[The effectiveness of surgical compared to nonsurgical treatment of periodontal disease. 1. Molar surfaces. 24-month study].","authors":"L Rojas,&nbsp;M Quintana,&nbsp;J J Villavicencio,&nbsp;J Egelberg","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The response to the treatment and periodontal maintenance during a period of 24 month, was investigated in 17 patients with periodontal disease by comparing root debridement alone versus root debridement plus surgery, in the molar flat surfaces sites. A total of 443 sites were controlled every 3 month and recorded every 6 month in regard to plaque indice bleeding frequency, probing pocket depth and changes of probing attachment level. The results analysed using linear regression, demonstrated that in sites with initial probing depth 0-3 mm or 4-6 mm. at 24 th months there was an evident improvement in the clinical conditions of the periodontal tissues, independent in the treatment modality. Sites with initial probing depth of 7 or more mm., however, showed a different result. In this sites, the plaque indice and the probing pocket depth were considerable reduced, but the frequency of bleeding and the clinical attachment level showed a negative result, in those sites treated by root debridement alone compared with root debridement plus surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":77788,"journal":{"name":"Revista de la Facultad de Odontologia (Santiago, Chile)","volume":"8 2","pages":"26-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de la Facultad de Odontologia (Santiago, Chile)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The response to the treatment and periodontal maintenance during a period of 24 month, was investigated in 17 patients with periodontal disease by comparing root debridement alone versus root debridement plus surgery, in the molar flat surfaces sites. A total of 443 sites were controlled every 3 month and recorded every 6 month in regard to plaque indice bleeding frequency, probing pocket depth and changes of probing attachment level. The results analysed using linear regression, demonstrated that in sites with initial probing depth 0-3 mm or 4-6 mm. at 24 th months there was an evident improvement in the clinical conditions of the periodontal tissues, independent in the treatment modality. Sites with initial probing depth of 7 or more mm., however, showed a different result. In this sites, the plaque indice and the probing pocket depth were considerable reduced, but the frequency of bleeding and the clinical attachment level showed a negative result, in those sites treated by root debridement alone compared with root debridement plus surgery.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[牙周病手术治疗与非手术治疗的效果比较。]1. 摩尔表面。24个月的研究。
我们对17例牙周病患者进行了为期24个月的治疗和牙周维护,比较了单纯牙根清创与牙根清创加手术在磨牙平面部位的疗效。每3个月对照443个点,每6个月记录斑块指数出血频率、探诊袋深度、探诊附着水平变化情况。使用线性回归分析结果表明,在第24个月时,在初始探诊深度为0- 3mm或4- 6mm的部位,牙周组织的临床状况有明显改善,与治疗方式无关。然而,初始探测深度为7毫米或更大的部位显示出不同的结果。在这些部位,单纯根清创较单纯根清创加手术相比,斑块指数和探诊袋深度明显减少,但出血频率和临床附着水平呈阴性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Antimicrobial activity of orthodontic band cements]. [The effectiveness of surgical compared to nonsurgical treatment of periodontal disease. 1. Molar surfaces. 24-month study]. [The oral health care system in Chile, its influence on the ethical behavior of dentists]. [Ecology of the oral biosystem]. [Basic prevention standards in dentistry in relation to infection through blood and body fluids. Comision Nacional SIDA--Odontologia].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1