Ten Assumptions About Artificial Intelligence That Can Mislead Patent Law Analysis

Daria Kim, M. Alber, Man Wai Kwok, Jelena Mitrović, Cristian Ramírez-Atencia, Jesus Rodriguez Perez, Heiner Zille
{"title":"Ten Assumptions About Artificial Intelligence That Can Mislead Patent Law Analysis","authors":"Daria Kim, M. Alber, Man Wai Kwok, Jelena Mitrović, Cristian Ramírez-Atencia, Jesus Rodriguez Perez, Heiner Zille","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3910332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper examines a set of assumptions about artificial intelligence, particularly machine learning, often taken as factual premises in discussions on the future of patent law in the wake of ‘artificial ingenuity’. The objective is to draw a more realistic and nuanced picture of the human-computer interaction in solving technical problems than where AI systems autonomously generate inventions. A detailed technical perspective is presented for each assumption, followed by a discussion of specific uncertainties under patent law. Overall, it is argued that none of the posited assumptions on closer examination appears to raise fundamental uncertainty about the appropriateness of the patent system.","PeriodicalId":288317,"journal":{"name":"International Political Economy: Globalization eJournal","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Political Economy: Globalization eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3910332","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper examines a set of assumptions about artificial intelligence, particularly machine learning, often taken as factual premises in discussions on the future of patent law in the wake of ‘artificial ingenuity’. The objective is to draw a more realistic and nuanced picture of the human-computer interaction in solving technical problems than where AI systems autonomously generate inventions. A detailed technical perspective is presented for each assumption, followed by a discussion of specific uncertainties under patent law. Overall, it is argued that none of the posited assumptions on closer examination appears to raise fundamental uncertainty about the appropriateness of the patent system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于人工智能的十个假设可能会误导专利法分析
本文研究了一系列关于人工智能的假设,特别是机器学习,这些假设通常被视为“人工智慧”之后专利法未来讨论的事实前提。其目标是在解决技术问题时,绘制一幅更现实、更细致的人机交互图景,而不是人工智能系统自主产生发明。对每个假设都提出了详细的技术观点,然后讨论了专利法下的具体不确定性。总体而言,本文认为,经过更仔细的审查,没有任何假设似乎会对专利制度的适当性产生根本的不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Difficulties in Finding Middle-Skilled Jobs under Increased Automation Online Shopping with Artificial Intelligence: What Role to play for Trade Marks? The Big Screen: Mapping the Diffusion of Foreign Investment Screening Mechanisms Design Rules Volume 2 Chapter 21—Capturing Value via Strategic Bottlenecks in Digital Exchange Platforms Design Rules Volume 2: Chapter 20—Digital Exchange Platforms: The Technologies of Crowdsourcing and Peer Production
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1