Criteria development for sustainable construction manufacturing in Construction Industry 4.0

F. Tahmasebinia, S. Sepasgozar, S. Shirowzhan, M. Niemela, Arthur Tripp, Servani Nagabhyrava, Zuheen Mansuri ko ko, F. Alonso-marroquin
{"title":"Criteria development for sustainable construction manufacturing in Construction Industry 4.0","authors":"F. Tahmasebinia, S. Sepasgozar, S. Shirowzhan, M. Niemela, Arthur Tripp, Servani Nagabhyrava, Zuheen Mansuri ko ko, F. Alonso-marroquin","doi":"10.1108/ci-10-2019-0103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to present the sustainable performance criteria for 3D printing practices, while reporting the primarily computations and lab experimentations. The potential advantages for integrating three-dimensional (3D) printing into house construction are significant in Construction Industry 4.0; these include the capacity for mass customisation of designs and parameters for functional and aesthetic purposes, reduction in construction waste from highly precise material placement and the use of recycled waste products in layer deposition materials. With the ultimate goal of improving construction efficiency and decreasing building costs, applying Strand7 Finite Element Analysis software, a numerical model was designed specifically for 3D printing in a cement mix incorporated with recycled waste product high-density polyethylene (HDPE) and found that construction of an arched truss-like roof was structurally feasible without the need for steel reinforcements.,The research method consists of three key steps: design a prototype of possible structural layouts for the 3DSBP, create 24 laboratory samples using a brittle material to identify operation challenges and analyse the correlation between time and scale size and synthesising the numerical analysis and laboratory observations to develop the evaluation criteria for 3DSBP products. The selected house consists of layouts that resemble existing house such as living room, bed rooms and garages.,Some criteria for sustainable construction using 3DP were developed. The Strand7 model results suggested that under the different load combinations as stated in AS1700, the maximum tensile stress experienced is 1.70 MPa and maximum compressive stress experienced is 3.06 MPa. The cement mix of the house is incorporated with rHDPE, which result in a tensile strength of 3 MPa and compressive strength of 26 MPa. That means the house is structurally feasible without the help of any reinforcements. Investigations had also been performed on comparing a flat and arch and found the maximum tensile stress within a flat roof would cause the concrete to fail. Whereas an arch roof had reduced the maximum tensile stress to an acceptable range for concrete to withstand loadings. Currently, there are a few 3D printing techniques that can be adopted for this purpose, and more advanced technology in the future could eliminate the current limitation on 3D printing and bring forth this idea as a common practice in house construction.,This study provides some novel criteria for evaluating a 3D printing performance and discusses challenges of 3D utilisation from design and managerial perspectives. The criteria are relied on maximum utility and minimum impact pillars which can be used by scholars and practitioners to measure their performance. The criteria and the results of the computation and experimentation can be considered as critical benchmarks for future practices.","PeriodicalId":221945,"journal":{"name":"Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management","volume":"2017 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"33","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ci-10-2019-0103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

Abstract

This paper aims to present the sustainable performance criteria for 3D printing practices, while reporting the primarily computations and lab experimentations. The potential advantages for integrating three-dimensional (3D) printing into house construction are significant in Construction Industry 4.0; these include the capacity for mass customisation of designs and parameters for functional and aesthetic purposes, reduction in construction waste from highly precise material placement and the use of recycled waste products in layer deposition materials. With the ultimate goal of improving construction efficiency and decreasing building costs, applying Strand7 Finite Element Analysis software, a numerical model was designed specifically for 3D printing in a cement mix incorporated with recycled waste product high-density polyethylene (HDPE) and found that construction of an arched truss-like roof was structurally feasible without the need for steel reinforcements.,The research method consists of three key steps: design a prototype of possible structural layouts for the 3DSBP, create 24 laboratory samples using a brittle material to identify operation challenges and analyse the correlation between time and scale size and synthesising the numerical analysis and laboratory observations to develop the evaluation criteria for 3DSBP products. The selected house consists of layouts that resemble existing house such as living room, bed rooms and garages.,Some criteria for sustainable construction using 3DP were developed. The Strand7 model results suggested that under the different load combinations as stated in AS1700, the maximum tensile stress experienced is 1.70 MPa and maximum compressive stress experienced is 3.06 MPa. The cement mix of the house is incorporated with rHDPE, which result in a tensile strength of 3 MPa and compressive strength of 26 MPa. That means the house is structurally feasible without the help of any reinforcements. Investigations had also been performed on comparing a flat and arch and found the maximum tensile stress within a flat roof would cause the concrete to fail. Whereas an arch roof had reduced the maximum tensile stress to an acceptable range for concrete to withstand loadings. Currently, there are a few 3D printing techniques that can be adopted for this purpose, and more advanced technology in the future could eliminate the current limitation on 3D printing and bring forth this idea as a common practice in house construction.,This study provides some novel criteria for evaluating a 3D printing performance and discusses challenges of 3D utilisation from design and managerial perspectives. The criteria are relied on maximum utility and minimum impact pillars which can be used by scholars and practitioners to measure their performance. The criteria and the results of the computation and experimentation can be considered as critical benchmarks for future practices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建筑业4.0中可持续建筑制造的标准制定
本文旨在介绍3D打印实践的可持续性能标准,同时报告了主要计算和实验室实验。在建筑业4.0中,将三维(3D)打印集成到房屋建造中的潜在优势是显著的;其中包括大规模定制设计和参数的能力,用于功能和美学目的,减少建筑废物,高度精确的材料放置,以及在层沉积材料中使用回收的废物产品。以提高施工效率和降低建筑成本为最终目标,应用Strand7有限元分析软件,设计了一个专门用于3D打印的数值模型,该模型在水泥混合物中加入了回收的废旧高密度聚乙烯(HDPE),并发现建造拱形桁架状屋顶在结构上是可行的,无需钢筋加固。该研究方法包括三个关键步骤:设计3DSBP可能的结构布局原型,使用脆性材料创建24个实验室样品以确定操作挑战,分析时间和尺度尺寸之间的相关性,并综合数值分析和实验室观察以制定3DSBP产品的评估标准。选定的住宅由类似于现有住宅的布局组成,如客厅、卧室和车库。制定了3d打印可持续建筑的一些标准。Strand7模型结果表明,在AS1700规定的不同载荷组合下,最大拉应力为1.70 MPa,最大压应力为3.06 MPa。房屋的水泥混合料中加入了rHDPE,其抗拉强度为3 MPa,抗压强度为26 MPa。这意味着这所房子在结构上是可行的,没有任何加固的帮助。研究人员还对平顶和拱形进行了比较,发现平顶的最大拉伸应力会导致混凝土破坏。而拱形屋顶将最大拉应力降低到混凝土承受载荷的可接受范围。目前,有一些3D打印技术可以用于这一目的,未来更先进的技术可以消除目前对3D打印的限制,使这一想法成为房屋建筑的普遍做法。本研究为评估3D打印性能提供了一些新的标准,并从设计和管理的角度讨论了3D利用的挑战。这些标准依赖于最大效用和最小影响支柱,学者和从业者可以使用这些标准来衡量他们的绩效。计算和实验的准则和结果可以被认为是未来实践的关键基准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The feasibility of transparent solar panels for high-rise building façade in Sri Lanka Detecting skewed pricing in tenders for public-sector projects Understanding the key risks in circular construction projects: from systematic review to conceptual framework A critical review of quantity surveying education in an offsite construction perspective: strategies for up-skilling Development and testing of lean simulation game on set-based design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1