DEVELOPMENT OF CLASS-BASED COGNITIVE ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT ACCORDING TO CURRICULUM 2013 ON TECHNICAL DRAWING SUBJECTS IN VOCATIONAL SCHOOL

Ita Novita Sari, S. Ramdani
{"title":"DEVELOPMENT OF CLASS-BASED COGNITIVE ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT ACCORDING TO CURRICULUM 2013 ON TECHNICAL DRAWING SUBJECTS IN VOCATIONAL SCHOOL","authors":"Ita Novita Sari, S. Ramdani","doi":"10.30870/VANOS.V2I2.2930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 2013 curriculum uses a classroom-based assessment. The curriculum contains various supporters, one of which is an assessment. Assessment by teachers is used to measure the achievement of learning objectives. But in the real world, a teacher has difficulty in developing assessment planning, assessment implementation, and processing of assessment result, and teacher has not analyzed comprehensively about validity and reliability in question, and analysis of evaluation instrument conducted by the teacher is only limited to analyze difficulty level. Thus, the problem that is made to know the cognitive level of students has not known the quality. The objectives of this study were (1) to know the reliability of cognitive assessment instruments developed, (2) to know the level of difficulty, (3) to know the differentiating power, and (4) to know the effectiveness of the cultivators. The method used in this research is research and development (R & D) developed by Borg & Gall. Data analysis technique that is done is instrument validation test with construct validity through judgment expert, reliability test using ITEMAN with formula CR-20. This study resulted in (1) the reliability of the question items of 0.740, (2) the degree of difficulty there are three levels, namely difficult 23%, medium 70%, and easy 7%, (3) distinguishing power on the grain matter analysis resulted in 20%, 7% of the questions are sufficient, 60% is good, and 13% are very good, and (4) the effectiveness of the deception is 82% working and 18% not working.","PeriodicalId":389382,"journal":{"name":"Vanos: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vanos: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30870/VANOS.V2I2.2930","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The 2013 curriculum uses a classroom-based assessment. The curriculum contains various supporters, one of which is an assessment. Assessment by teachers is used to measure the achievement of learning objectives. But in the real world, a teacher has difficulty in developing assessment planning, assessment implementation, and processing of assessment result, and teacher has not analyzed comprehensively about validity and reliability in question, and analysis of evaluation instrument conducted by the teacher is only limited to analyze difficulty level. Thus, the problem that is made to know the cognitive level of students has not known the quality. The objectives of this study were (1) to know the reliability of cognitive assessment instruments developed, (2) to know the level of difficulty, (3) to know the differentiating power, and (4) to know the effectiveness of the cultivators. The method used in this research is research and development (R & D) developed by Borg & Gall. Data analysis technique that is done is instrument validation test with construct validity through judgment expert, reliability test using ITEMAN with formula CR-20. This study resulted in (1) the reliability of the question items of 0.740, (2) the degree of difficulty there are three levels, namely difficult 23%, medium 70%, and easy 7%, (3) distinguishing power on the grain matter analysis resulted in 20%, 7% of the questions are sufficient, 60% is good, and 13% are very good, and (4) the effectiveness of the deception is 82% working and 18% not working.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于2013年课程要求的职业学校技术制图课班级认知评价工具的开发
2013年的课程采用基于课堂的评估。课程包含各种支持,其中之一是评估。教师的评估是用来衡量学习目标的实现情况。但在现实生活中,教师在制定评估计划、实施评估、处理评估结果等方面存在困难,教师没有对问题的效度和信度进行全面分析,教师对评估工具的分析也仅仅局限于分析难度等级。这样,就造成了认识学生认知水平不认识质量的问题。本研究的目的是:(1)了解所开发的认知评估工具的可靠性,(2)了解难度水平,(3)了解差异化能力,(4)了解培养者的有效性。在这项研究中使用的方法是研究和发展(r&d)由博格和盖尔开发。数据分析方法是通过判断专家进行结构效度的仪器验证检验,采用ITEMAN进行信度检验,采用CR-20公式进行信度检验。本研究的结果是:(1)题项的信度为0.740;(2)难易程度有三个等级,分别为难23%、中70%、易7%;(3)质料分析的分辨力为20%、7%为一般、60%为良好、13%为非常好;(4)欺骗的有效性为82%有效、18%不有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development of Android-Based Starter Motor Learning Media for Improving Students 'Abilities and Knowing its Learning Motivated Achievements The Effect of Zeolite Catalysis Size on Biodiesel Characteristics of Bio-Oil from Tuna Waste Industry-Oriented Automotive Learning Model to Improve Job Readiness of Automotive Vocational School Students Design and Build of Electric Car Frame SULA Evolution THERMAL ENHANCEMENT FOR PARAFFINIC THERMAL ENERGY STORAGE BY ADDING VOLCANIC ASH
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1