{"title":"La estetosfera en las artes y el retorno del medioevo","authors":"H. Campos","doi":"10.29035/UCMAULE.56.59","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolEn la semiosfera (Lotman 2000, 1996) posmoderna actual (Lyotard, 1996), el tiempo de las vanguardias ha pasado. Vivimos en una pluralidad de esteticas (Gombrich, 1999) o modos de sensibilidad, que en su mas lograda expresion tienen que ver con el placer estetico vinculado a las bellas artes (Valery, 2018). Sin embargo, esto empana la posibilidad anticipadora resolutiva de un horizonte extatico de futuro (Heidegger, 2015), si solo se deja ver la diferencia superficial de los entes y no el orden unitario que subyace a estas (Heraclito, 2009), con lo cual se cae en la medianidad de un presente que no reconoce su futuro, ni su pasado (Heidegger, 2015; Jaspers, 1958). Teniendo como base la hipotesis de que una expresion de dicho orden en las artes tiene que ver con que lo mas avanzado coincide con lo mas tradicional (Gombrich, 1999), se estudiaron textos actuales que hacen referencia a diferentes expresiones artisticas, buscando concurrencias conceptuales (Grondin, 1999), que indicialmente (Ginzburg, 2004) relevaron tal orden subyacente en el modo de una estetosfera como una estructura ontologica de sensitividad, desde la cual emerge en la actualidad una semiosfera epistemologica, entretejida de tensiones entre nucleos conceptuales descentrados que actualizan elementos culturales del medioevo. EnglishIn the current postmodern (Lyotard, 1996) semiosphere (Lotman 2000, 1996), the time of the avantgardes has passed. We live in a plurality of aesthetic (Gombrich, 1999) or modes of sensitivity which in its most successful expression have to do with the aesthetic pleasure related to fine arts (Valery, 2018). However, this tarnishes the possibility of an anticipatory resolution of an ecstatic horizon of future (Heidegger, 2015), if only is allowed to see the surface difference of entities and not the unit order that underlies these (Heraclito, 2009), with which we falls in the medium of a present that does not recognize their future or their past (Heidegger, 2015; Jaspers, 1958). Taking as a basis the hypothesis that an expresion of that order in the arts, has to do with the ultimate coincides with the more traditional (Gombrich, 1999), it was studied current texts that refer to different artistic expressions, looking for conceptual convergences (Grondin, 1999) that indexically (Ginzburg, 2004) relieved such underlying in the mode of an aestheticsphere as an ontolical structure of sensitivity, from which emerges an epistemological semiosphere today, interweaving of tensions between decentralized conceptual nuclei that updated cultural elements of the middle ages.","PeriodicalId":206644,"journal":{"name":"Revista UCMaule","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista UCMaule","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29035/UCMAULE.56.59","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
espanolEn la semiosfera (Lotman 2000, 1996) posmoderna actual (Lyotard, 1996), el tiempo de las vanguardias ha pasado. Vivimos en una pluralidad de esteticas (Gombrich, 1999) o modos de sensibilidad, que en su mas lograda expresion tienen que ver con el placer estetico vinculado a las bellas artes (Valery, 2018). Sin embargo, esto empana la posibilidad anticipadora resolutiva de un horizonte extatico de futuro (Heidegger, 2015), si solo se deja ver la diferencia superficial de los entes y no el orden unitario que subyace a estas (Heraclito, 2009), con lo cual se cae en la medianidad de un presente que no reconoce su futuro, ni su pasado (Heidegger, 2015; Jaspers, 1958). Teniendo como base la hipotesis de que una expresion de dicho orden en las artes tiene que ver con que lo mas avanzado coincide con lo mas tradicional (Gombrich, 1999), se estudiaron textos actuales que hacen referencia a diferentes expresiones artisticas, buscando concurrencias conceptuales (Grondin, 1999), que indicialmente (Ginzburg, 2004) relevaron tal orden subyacente en el modo de una estetosfera como una estructura ontologica de sensitividad, desde la cual emerge en la actualidad una semiosfera epistemologica, entretejida de tensiones entre nucleos conceptuales descentrados que actualizan elementos culturales del medioevo. EnglishIn the current postmodern (Lyotard, 1996) semiosphere (Lotman 2000, 1996), the time of the avantgardes has passed. We live in a plurality of aesthetic (Gombrich, 1999) or modes of sensitivity which in its most successful expression have to do with the aesthetic pleasure related to fine arts (Valery, 2018). However, this tarnishes the possibility of an anticipatory resolution of an ecstatic horizon of future (Heidegger, 2015), if only is allowed to see the surface difference of entities and not the unit order that underlies these (Heraclito, 2009), with which we falls in the medium of a present that does not recognize their future or their past (Heidegger, 2015; Jaspers, 1958). Taking as a basis the hypothesis that an expresion of that order in the arts, has to do with the ultimate coincides with the more traditional (Gombrich, 1999), it was studied current texts that refer to different artistic expressions, looking for conceptual convergences (Grondin, 1999) that indexically (Ginzburg, 2004) relieved such underlying in the mode of an aestheticsphere as an ontolical structure of sensitivity, from which emerges an epistemological semiosphere today, interweaving of tensions between decentralized conceptual nuclei that updated cultural elements of the middle ages.
今天的后现代主义(利奥塔尔,1996),前卫的时代已经过去。我们生活在多种美学(Gombrich, 1999)或情感模式中,在其最成功的表达中,与与美术相关的审美愉悦有关(Valery, 2018)。然而,这empana anticipadora resolutiva extatico前景美好的未来(海德格尔,2015),如果只是看到表面的差距和不统一的秩序这些实体(Heraclito, 2009),从而在给予一份礼物,它不承认他的未来,或者他过去(海德格尔,2015年;雅斯贝尔斯,1958年)。根据该命令的一个expresion hipotesis在他与艺术中最先进的传统与事(Gombrich, 1999年)研究了目前的案文,artisticas表达式引用不同,寻找到场概念(Grondin, 1999), 2004年indicialmente (Ginzburg)户口底层秩序如何像estetosfera sensitividad ontologica结构,从这个意义上说,今天出现了一个认识论的符号圈,在分散的概念核心之间交织着紧张关系,这些概念核心更新了中世纪的文化元素。《现代后现代》(Lyotard, 1996)《半球》(Lotman 2000, 1996),《先锋时代已经过去》。我们生活在美学的多元化中(Gombrich, 1999)或情感模式,在其最成功的表达中必须对与美术相关的审美愉悦做出贡献(Valery, 2018)。但是,这种tarnishes the possibility of an对本resolution of an ecstatic地平线of future(海德格尔,2015),如果允许only to see the surface difference of实体and not the order that underlies这些(Heraclito unit, 2009) with which we瀑布in the medium of a目前that并不recognize其未来或过去。他们(海德格尔,2015;雅斯贝尔斯,1958年)。采取基础the hypothesis that an expresion of that order in the条,has to do with the ultimate coincides with the more传统Gombrich, 1999年),俄罗斯studied current texts, refer to不同艺术expressions convergences (Grondin, 1999)的概念,寻找that indexically (Ginzburg, 2004) relieved此种underlying in the mode of an aestheticsphere as an ontolical structure of sensitivity, from which你an epistemological semiosphere today,= =地理= =根据美国人口普查,这个县的面积为。