{"title":"Scholae in Liberales by Petrus Ramus, and: Colectaneae Praefationes, Epistolae, Orationes by Petrus Ramus and Audomarus Talaeus (review)","authors":"James Shay","doi":"10.1353/RMR.1980.0042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Peter Ramus, born Pierre de la Ramée in 1515, appointed Regius Professor of Eloquence and Philosophy at the University of Paris, murdered by his academic enemies during the St. Bartholomew's Massacre in 1572, was a Renaissance humanist, reformer, and encyclopedist. His biographer, Freigius, claims that for his Master's degree Ramus defended the proposition \"Whatever Aristotle has said must be considered fabricated.\" The topic not only gives testimony to Ramus' intellectual versatility, but it also foreshadows his reputation as an academic enfant terrible. The 300 editions of Dialectic in Latin or French along with over 150 editions of this Rhetoric attest to his enormous influence and popularity (see Walter J. Ong, Ramus and Talon inventory, Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1958). As a humanist reform movement, Ramism prompted a furious debate about curriculum and other educational matters that lasted well into the seventeenth century. Ramist logic was at the center of that debate: virtually every book about dialectic in this period is an attack or defense of Ramist logic. Ramist logic flourished at Cambridge and was the first system taught at Harvard. It is identified with Puritanism, principally through the work of commentators—William Temple, George Downame, Richard Hooker, and Everard Digby. Samuel Eliot Morison and Perry Miller have elaborated Ramus influence on the intellectual life of colonia America, an influence captured in Increase Mather's reference to Ramus as \"that Great Scholar and Blessed Martyr.\" More recently, as interest in Renaissance rhetoric has grown, so has interest in Ramism. Wilbur Samuel Howell's Logic andRhetoric in England, 1500-1700 (Princeton, 1956) is an invaluable study of the period. Walter Ong's Ramus, Method, and the Decay of Dialogue (Harvard, 1958), is a particularly resourceful and influential treatment of Ramist ideas. The two volumes under review here are works for the specialist: theymake available majordocuments of the Ramist corpus. Scholae in Liberales Artes (Lectures on the Liberal Arts), the most readable of Ramist works, is a collection of supplements to the textbooks Ramus wrote on the various arts. This volume also contains a set of lectures on Ramus' ideas about teaching policies. The order of this 1596 edition follows that of the curriculum:","PeriodicalId":326714,"journal":{"name":"Rocky Mountain Review of Language and Literature","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rocky Mountain Review of Language and Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/RMR.1980.0042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Peter Ramus, born Pierre de la Ramée in 1515, appointed Regius Professor of Eloquence and Philosophy at the University of Paris, murdered by his academic enemies during the St. Bartholomew's Massacre in 1572, was a Renaissance humanist, reformer, and encyclopedist. His biographer, Freigius, claims that for his Master's degree Ramus defended the proposition "Whatever Aristotle has said must be considered fabricated." The topic not only gives testimony to Ramus' intellectual versatility, but it also foreshadows his reputation as an academic enfant terrible. The 300 editions of Dialectic in Latin or French along with over 150 editions of this Rhetoric attest to his enormous influence and popularity (see Walter J. Ong, Ramus and Talon inventory, Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1958). As a humanist reform movement, Ramism prompted a furious debate about curriculum and other educational matters that lasted well into the seventeenth century. Ramist logic was at the center of that debate: virtually every book about dialectic in this period is an attack or defense of Ramist logic. Ramist logic flourished at Cambridge and was the first system taught at Harvard. It is identified with Puritanism, principally through the work of commentators—William Temple, George Downame, Richard Hooker, and Everard Digby. Samuel Eliot Morison and Perry Miller have elaborated Ramus influence on the intellectual life of colonia America, an influence captured in Increase Mather's reference to Ramus as "that Great Scholar and Blessed Martyr." More recently, as interest in Renaissance rhetoric has grown, so has interest in Ramism. Wilbur Samuel Howell's Logic andRhetoric in England, 1500-1700 (Princeton, 1956) is an invaluable study of the period. Walter Ong's Ramus, Method, and the Decay of Dialogue (Harvard, 1958), is a particularly resourceful and influential treatment of Ramist ideas. The two volumes under review here are works for the specialist: theymake available majordocuments of the Ramist corpus. Scholae in Liberales Artes (Lectures on the Liberal Arts), the most readable of Ramist works, is a collection of supplements to the textbooks Ramus wrote on the various arts. This volume also contains a set of lectures on Ramus' ideas about teaching policies. The order of this 1596 edition follows that of the curriculum:
彼得·拉莫斯,生于1515年,原名皮埃尔·德·拉·拉姆萨梅,被任命为巴黎大学口才和哲学教授,在1572年的圣巴塞洛缪大屠杀中被他的学术敌人谋杀,他是文艺复兴时期的人文主义者、改革者和百科全书作者。他的传记作者Freigius声称,在他的硕士学位中,Ramus捍卫了“亚里士多德所说的一切都必须被认为是捏造的”这一命题。这个话题不仅证明了拉姆斯的知识广博,也预示了他作为一个学究的坏小子的名声。300个拉丁文或法文版本的《辩证法》以及150多个版本的《修辞学》证明了他巨大的影响力和知名度(见Walter J. Ong, Ramus and Talon inventory,剑桥,哈佛大学出版社,1958)。作为一场人文主义改革运动,拉美主义引发了一场关于课程和其他教育问题的激烈辩论,这场辩论一直持续到17世纪。拉米斯逻辑是这场辩论的中心:实际上,这一时期每一本关于辩证法的书都是对拉米斯逻辑的攻击或辩护。拉米斯逻辑在剑桥蓬勃发展,是哈佛教授的第一个系统。它被认为是清教主义,主要是通过评论家的工作-威廉·坦普尔,乔治·唐纳,理查德·胡克,和埃弗拉德·迪格比。塞缪尔·艾略特·莫里森(Samuel Eliot morrison)和佩里·米勒(Perry Miller)详细阐述了拉莫斯对美国殖民地知识分子生活的影响,这种影响体现在英克里斯·马瑟(Increase Mather)将拉莫斯称为“伟大的学者和受祝福的烈士”。最近,随着人们对文艺复兴时期修辞学的兴趣日益浓厚,人们对拉美主义也越来越感兴趣。威尔伯·塞缪尔·豪厄尔的《英格兰的逻辑学与修辞学,1500-1700》(普林斯顿大学,1956年)是对这一时期的宝贵研究。Walter Ong的《Ramus, Method, and Decay of Dialogue》(哈佛,1958)是对Ramus思想的一次特别机智和有影响力的论述。这里审查的两卷是专家的作品:它们提供了Ramist语料库的主要文件。《文理讲学》(Scholae in Liberales Artes)是Ramus最易读的作品,是Ramus写的关于各种艺术的教科书的补充集。本卷还包含了一套讲座Ramus的思想关于教学政策。1596年版的顺序遵循课程的顺序: