Moldova: Military Confrontation with Russian Forces

Marinko Bobić
{"title":"Moldova: Military Confrontation with Russian Forces","authors":"Marinko Bobić","doi":"10.1332/policypress/9781529205206.003.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chapter five focuses on the asymmetric conflict between Moldova and the Russian forces which supported separatists in Transnistria. The purpose was to uncover why Mircea Snegur’s Moldovan regime seemed unyielding to Russian demands, which resulted in armed conflict. The underlying argument is primarily based on the necessary condition, namely that Chisinau had a domestic crisis that needed immediate attention. Moldova was trying to claim its sovereignty, where an important step entailed establishing a common identity and territorial control. While Snegur’s presidency was stable and popular, it was dependent on nationalists’ support. Such dependency required policies that marginalised minorities and fuelled conflict with Russia, which wanted to retain Moldova within its sphere of influence. However, having perceived numerous crises unfolding in the late Soviet Union and emerging Russia, Snegur made a calculatable gamble that Russia would not be able to commit to a conflict. In other words, Snegur perceived a window of opportunity. The gamble failed, however. Nonetheless, with a counter-factual assessment, these findings are further strengthened.","PeriodicalId":317648,"journal":{"name":"Why Minor Powers Risk Wars with Major Powers","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Why Minor Powers Risk Wars with Major Powers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781529205206.003.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chapter five focuses on the asymmetric conflict between Moldova and the Russian forces which supported separatists in Transnistria. The purpose was to uncover why Mircea Snegur’s Moldovan regime seemed unyielding to Russian demands, which resulted in armed conflict. The underlying argument is primarily based on the necessary condition, namely that Chisinau had a domestic crisis that needed immediate attention. Moldova was trying to claim its sovereignty, where an important step entailed establishing a common identity and territorial control. While Snegur’s presidency was stable and popular, it was dependent on nationalists’ support. Such dependency required policies that marginalised minorities and fuelled conflict with Russia, which wanted to retain Moldova within its sphere of influence. However, having perceived numerous crises unfolding in the late Soviet Union and emerging Russia, Snegur made a calculatable gamble that Russia would not be able to commit to a conflict. In other words, Snegur perceived a window of opportunity. The gamble failed, however. Nonetheless, with a counter-factual assessment, these findings are further strengthened.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
摩尔多瓦:与俄罗斯军队的军事对抗
第五章主要讨论摩尔多瓦与支持德涅斯特河沿岸分裂分子的俄罗斯军队之间的不对称冲突。调查的目的是找出米尔恰·斯涅古尔的摩尔多瓦政权为何对俄罗斯的要求不让步,从而导致了武装冲突。基本论点主要基于必要条件,即基希讷乌有一场需要立即注意的国内危机。摩尔多瓦正试图要求其主权,其中一个重要步骤是建立共同的特性和领土控制。虽然斯涅格尔的总统职位稳定而受欢迎,但它依赖于民族主义者的支持。这种依赖需要边缘化少数民族的政策,并加剧与俄罗斯的冲突,后者希望将摩尔多瓦留在其势力范围内。然而,在意识到苏联后期和新兴的俄罗斯出现了许多危机之后,斯涅格尔做了一个可以计算的赌博,即俄罗斯将无法参与冲突。换句话说,斯奈格发现了一个机会之窗。然而,这场赌博失败了。然而,通过反事实的评估,这些发现得到进一步加强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pathways to Conflict Using Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) Conclusion: Dealing with Complexity, Defeat and Beliefs In Search of a Theory of Minor Powers in Interstate Asymmetric Conflict Index Conclusion:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1