Comprehension correlates of the occurrence and deletion of “de” in Mandarin “N1 (de) N2” structures

Junyuan Zhao, Junru Wu
{"title":"Comprehension correlates of the occurrence and deletion of “de” in Mandarin “N1 (de) N2” structures","authors":"Junyuan Zhao, Junru Wu","doi":"10.1109/IALP48816.2019.9037704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on corpus materials and on-line semantic judgment surveys, this paper investigates the comprehension differences related to the occurrence and deletion of “de” in the Mandarin “N1 (de) N2” structure. By applying PCA and LME modellings on a set of semantic survey data, this study provides a multi-level database of semantic measurements for a set of Chinese “N1 (de) N2” structures as well as a quantitative analysis regarding the correlation between structure-level and constituent-level semantic features. The research shows that:(1) The “de”-occurring structure is more likely to be interpreted as indefinite than the “de”-deletion structure. (2) Animacy of N1 is positively related to the grammaticality of the “de”-occurring structure, while animacy of N1 is negatively related to the grammaticality of the “de”-deletion structure. The research findings provide evidence for prototype effects in the process of language comprehension. We propose that in natural comprehension, there is a high-animacy bias for N1 regarding the “de”-occurring structure; while a low animacy interpretation for N1 is more prototypical for the “de”-deletion structure. Accordingly, the “de”-occurring structure tends to be interpreted as a possessive, while the “de”-deletion structure is more likely to be interpreted as a modifier-head structure.","PeriodicalId":208066,"journal":{"name":"2019 International Conference on Asian Language Processing (IALP)","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 International Conference on Asian Language Processing (IALP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IALP48816.2019.9037704","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Based on corpus materials and on-line semantic judgment surveys, this paper investigates the comprehension differences related to the occurrence and deletion of “de” in the Mandarin “N1 (de) N2” structure. By applying PCA and LME modellings on a set of semantic survey data, this study provides a multi-level database of semantic measurements for a set of Chinese “N1 (de) N2” structures as well as a quantitative analysis regarding the correlation between structure-level and constituent-level semantic features. The research shows that:(1) The “de”-occurring structure is more likely to be interpreted as indefinite than the “de”-deletion structure. (2) Animacy of N1 is positively related to the grammaticality of the “de”-occurring structure, while animacy of N1 is negatively related to the grammaticality of the “de”-deletion structure. The research findings provide evidence for prototype effects in the process of language comprehension. We propose that in natural comprehension, there is a high-animacy bias for N1 regarding the “de”-occurring structure; while a low animacy interpretation for N1 is more prototypical for the “de”-deletion structure. Accordingly, the “de”-occurring structure tends to be interpreted as a possessive, while the “de”-deletion structure is more likely to be interpreted as a modifier-head structure.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
普通话“N1 (de) N2”结构中“得”的出现和缺失与理解相关
基于语料库资料和在线语义判断调查,研究了汉语“N1 (de) N2”结构中“得”的出现和删除相关的理解差异。本研究通过对一组语义调查数据进行PCA和LME建模,建立了一组汉语“N1 (de) N2”结构的多层次语义测量数据库,并对结构级和成分级语义特征之间的相关性进行了定量分析。研究表明:(1)“de”-发生结构比“de”-删除结构更容易被解释为不确定结构。(2) N1的活力与“de”发生结构的语法性正相关,而N1的活力与“de”删除结构的语法性负相关。研究结果为语言理解过程中的原型效应提供了证据。我们提出,在自然理解中,对于“de”发生的结构,N1存在高度的动物性偏差;而对N1的低活力解释更符合“de”-缺失结构的原型。因此,“de”发生结构更倾向于被解释为所有格结构,而“de”删除结构更倾向于被解释为修饰语-词头结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A General Procedure for Improving Language Models in Low-Resource Speech Recognition Automated Prediction of Item Difficulty in Reading Comprehension Using Long Short-Term Memory An Measurement Method of Ancient Poetry Difficulty for Adaptive Testing How to Answer Comparison Questions An Enhancement of Malay Social Media Text Normalization for Lexicon-Based Sentiment Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1