Court Fees and Access to Justice in Australia

Jack Maxwell
{"title":"Court Fees and Access to Justice in Australia","authors":"Jack Maxwell","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3900825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On 1 January 2021, the fee for bringing a migration case in the Federal Circuit Court increased almost five-fold. Civil society groups say that this change will seriously threaten access to the courts. This comment argues that, if this is correct, the increase might be unlawful or unconstitutional. It proceeds in four parts. Part I introduces the new fee increase and examines its potential impact on access to the courts. Parts II and III explore several possible arguments against the increase. Part IV concludes.","PeriodicalId":138110,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Justice (Topic)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Justice (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3900825","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On 1 January 2021, the fee for bringing a migration case in the Federal Circuit Court increased almost five-fold. Civil society groups say that this change will seriously threaten access to the courts. This comment argues that, if this is correct, the increase might be unlawful or unconstitutional. It proceeds in four parts. Part I introduces the new fee increase and examines its potential impact on access to the courts. Parts II and III explore several possible arguments against the increase. Part IV concludes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
澳大利亚的法庭费用和诉诸司法的机会
从2021年1月1日起,在联邦巡回法院提起移民案件的费用增加了近五倍。民间社会组织表示,这一变化将严重威胁到诉诸法庭。该评论认为,如果这是正确的,那么增加可能是非法的或违宪的。本文分为四个部分。第一部分介绍了新的费用增加,并探讨了其对诉诸法院的潜在影响。第二部分和第三部分探讨了反对这种增长的几种可能的论点。第四部分是结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Court Fees and Access to Justice in Australia Bridging the 'Normative Gap': Mechanism Design and Social Justice Donation Without Domination: Private Charity and Republican Liberty The Big Fib: Democratic Ideals in an Unprincipled World Reconciling the Rawlsian and the Utilitarian Approaches to the Maximization of Social Welfare
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1