How Ethical Leadership Limits Organizational Deviance, and Promotes Organizational Citizenship Behavior: A Mediatory Role of Affective Commitment Complemented by Ethical Conviction and Reputation for Performance.
{"title":"How Ethical Leadership Limits Organizational Deviance, and Promotes Organizational Citizenship Behavior: A Mediatory Role of Affective Commitment Complemented by Ethical Conviction and Reputation for Performance.","authors":"Habeeba Masood, D. Siddiqui","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3757448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite numerous researches on ethical leadership, literature still lacks the researches on boundary conditions that limit its effectiveness. Thus, the present study examines the relationship between ethical leadership (EL) and organizational deviance via first-order mediation of affective commitment to the organization, as a reflection of the quality of the employee–organization relationship. Using Social learning & Exchange theories and group engagement models, we also examined the EL effect on Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) through organizational deviance as a second-order mediator. We also propose that this relationship is conditional on the supervisor’s reputation for performance (i.e., the moral standards are coupled with work effectiveness), and Perceived Leader Ethical Conviction. For the, we modified Neves and Story (2015) model to further extend to OCB while adding a moderator. OCB was measured in both Individual & organizational context. Empirical validity was established by conducting a survey using a close-ended questionnaire. Data was collected from 286 corporate employees from different sectors, working in Pakistan, and analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis and structured equation modeling. The results suggested that EL seems to exert a positive impact on Affective commitment, this would in turn have a negative effect on organizational deviance. Affective commitment also seems to have a positive effect on both OCB of individuals and organizations. Understandably, organizational deviance seems to be negatively affecting both OCBs. We also witnessed a positive complementary effect of Reputation for Performance in EL and affective commitment nexus. Hence, the positive relationship between ethical leadership and affective commitment is more pronounced when leaders have a high reputation for performance. Hence, results imply that organizations have to pay attention to the moral values and standards of supervisors and leaders, as they are significant role models due to their ability to reward or punish employees.","PeriodicalId":435876,"journal":{"name":"Leadership Development eJournal","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leadership Development eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3757448","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Despite numerous researches on ethical leadership, literature still lacks the researches on boundary conditions that limit its effectiveness. Thus, the present study examines the relationship between ethical leadership (EL) and organizational deviance via first-order mediation of affective commitment to the organization, as a reflection of the quality of the employee–organization relationship. Using Social learning & Exchange theories and group engagement models, we also examined the EL effect on Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) through organizational deviance as a second-order mediator. We also propose that this relationship is conditional on the supervisor’s reputation for performance (i.e., the moral standards are coupled with work effectiveness), and Perceived Leader Ethical Conviction. For the, we modified Neves and Story (2015) model to further extend to OCB while adding a moderator. OCB was measured in both Individual & organizational context. Empirical validity was established by conducting a survey using a close-ended questionnaire. Data was collected from 286 corporate employees from different sectors, working in Pakistan, and analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis and structured equation modeling. The results suggested that EL seems to exert a positive impact on Affective commitment, this would in turn have a negative effect on organizational deviance. Affective commitment also seems to have a positive effect on both OCB of individuals and organizations. Understandably, organizational deviance seems to be negatively affecting both OCBs. We also witnessed a positive complementary effect of Reputation for Performance in EL and affective commitment nexus. Hence, the positive relationship between ethical leadership and affective commitment is more pronounced when leaders have a high reputation for performance. Hence, results imply that organizations have to pay attention to the moral values and standards of supervisors and leaders, as they are significant role models due to their ability to reward or punish employees.
尽管对伦理型领导的研究很多,但文献中仍然缺乏对限制其有效性的边界条件的研究。因此,本研究通过对组织的情感承诺的一阶中介,作为员工-组织关系质量的反映,来检验伦理型领导与组织越轨之间的关系。利用社会学习在交换理论和群体参与模型的基础上,我们还通过组织偏差作为二级中介考察了EL对组织公民行为(OCB)的影响。我们还提出,这种关系取决于主管的绩效声誉(即,道德标准与工作效率相结合)和感知的领导者道德信念。我们修改了Neves and Story(2015)模型,进一步扩展到OCB,同时添加了一个主持人。OCB在个人和团队中均有测量;组织的上下文。实证效度是通过封闭式问卷调查建立的。本研究收集了在巴基斯坦工作的286名不同行业的企业员工的数据,并使用验证性因子分析和结构化方程模型进行分析。研究结果表明,情感承诺对组织偏差具有正向影响,而情感承诺对组织偏差具有负向影响。情感性承诺对个人和组织的组织公民行为都有积极的影响。可以理解的是,组织偏差似乎对两种组织公民行为都有负面影响。我们还发现绩效声誉在学习动机和情感承诺关系中存在正互补效应。因此,当领导者的绩效声誉较高时,伦理型领导与情感型承诺之间的正相关关系更为明显。因此,结果意味着组织必须关注主管和领导者的道德价值观和标准,因为他们有能力奖励或惩罚员工,因此是重要的榜样。