Digitization of justice in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and the implications of digitalization on constitutional rights

Ruxandra Bănică
{"title":"Digitization of justice in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and the implications of digitalization on constitutional rights","authors":"Ruxandra Bănică","doi":"10.47743/rdc-2020-2-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article aims to generate a preliminary radiography on the actual stage of \ndigitalization of justice in Romania, offering a perspective on its evolution both \ndomestically and internationally, a development forced, at least in appearance, \nby the COVID-19 pandemic and restrictions imposed by it. The electronic file, \nthe usual use of electronic signatures in trials, as well as the multitude of \ninformation provided in the virtual environment by public judicial institutions \nare some essential aspects that define the beginnings of this deeply \nrestructuring process. The most important question, on which no rigorous \nanalysis has been carried out so far, remains the following: how does this \nprocess impact the constitutional rights of citizens? In the chase after the \nalignment to the European approaches, to the evolution and speed of the \ndigital age in which we live, we lose sight of the fact that the Romanian citizens \nmay not be prepared for this process. The human component fades in front of \nthe benefits of artificial intelligence, adaptation at any cost is required by \nsociety, and indirectly, by the state, without providing the necessary resources \nin this regard. We propose a necessary reading from the perspective of \naffecting some rights guaranteed by the Constitution through digitization, \naspects worthy of consideration.","PeriodicalId":421528,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Drept Constituțional","volume":"172 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Drept Constituțional","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47743/rdc-2020-2-0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The article aims to generate a preliminary radiography on the actual stage of digitalization of justice in Romania, offering a perspective on its evolution both domestically and internationally, a development forced, at least in appearance, by the COVID-19 pandemic and restrictions imposed by it. The electronic file, the usual use of electronic signatures in trials, as well as the multitude of information provided in the virtual environment by public judicial institutions are some essential aspects that define the beginnings of this deeply restructuring process. The most important question, on which no rigorous analysis has been carried out so far, remains the following: how does this process impact the constitutional rights of citizens? In the chase after the alignment to the European approaches, to the evolution and speed of the digital age in which we live, we lose sight of the fact that the Romanian citizens may not be prepared for this process. The human component fades in front of the benefits of artificial intelligence, adaptation at any cost is required by society, and indirectly, by the state, without providing the necessary resources in this regard. We propose a necessary reading from the perspective of affecting some rights guaranteed by the Constitution through digitization, aspects worthy of consideration.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19大流行背景下的司法数字化以及数字化对宪法权利的影响
本文旨在初步了解罗马尼亚司法数字化的实际阶段,提供其国内和国际演变的视角,这一发展至少在表面上是由COVID-19大流行及其施加的限制所推动的。电子文件、在审判中通常使用的电子签名以及公共司法机构在虚拟环境中提供的大量信息是确定这一深刻重组进程开始的一些基本方面。最重要的问题仍然是:这一过程如何影响公民的宪法权利?迄今为止,对这一问题还没有进行严格的分析。在追求与欧洲接轨的过程中,在追求我们所生活的数字时代的演变和速度的过程中,我们忽视了罗马尼亚公民可能没有为这一过程做好准备的事实。在人工智能的好处面前,人的成分逐渐消失,社会需要不惜一切代价适应,间接地,国家也需要,而没有提供这方面的必要资源。我们从数字化对宪法保障的部分权利产生影响的角度提出了必要的解读,值得思考的方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on constitutionalism and the state of emergency Constitutional Challenges in the Algorithmic Society Responses to the COVID-19 pandemic from the Brazilian Supreme Court and Romanian Constitutional Court Establishing an International Court against Terorism Questions prejudicielles a la Cour de Justice de l'Union Europeene: l'experience de la Cour Constitutionelle de Belgique
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1