{"title":"Darius and Xerxes in Babylonia","authors":"G. G. Cameron","doi":"10.1086/370613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The available evidence from Babylonia, supplemented by that from Egypt (see R. A. Parker's article in this issue), definitely confirm the traditional date of 522/21 for the accession year of Darius. Once this is recognized, it is obvious that all the material from Babylonia must fit in one way or another into the general picture. That it does so is clear from the following summary. Herodotus, in Book iii, chapters 66-67, informs us that Cambyses reigned for seven years and five months. As others have shown, this figure is absolutely correct. The earliest document recording the sole rule of Cambyses1 is dated on the twelfth day of the sixth month, 530 B.C.; from the Behistun inscription, ? 11, we know that Bardiya revolted on the fourteenth day of the twelfth month (523/22); Cambyses reigned, therefore, six full months of 530/29 plus six full years plus eleven months of 523/22-a total of seven years and five months. A few scribes in Babylonia, as is to be expected, were unaware of Bardiya's revolt; others, of Cambyses' death. The last tablet dated to Cambyses, signed on the twenty-third day of the first month of the eighth year,2 was written by such a scribe. But the scribe who wrote the first extant published tablet of Bardiya knew that the last month of the Babylonian year 523/22 was in itself Bardiya's \"accession year\"; therefore, he correctly dated a document written in the","PeriodicalId":252942,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Semitic Languages and Literatures","volume":"134 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1941-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"43","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Semitic Languages and Literatures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/370613","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 43
Abstract
The available evidence from Babylonia, supplemented by that from Egypt (see R. A. Parker's article in this issue), definitely confirm the traditional date of 522/21 for the accession year of Darius. Once this is recognized, it is obvious that all the material from Babylonia must fit in one way or another into the general picture. That it does so is clear from the following summary. Herodotus, in Book iii, chapters 66-67, informs us that Cambyses reigned for seven years and five months. As others have shown, this figure is absolutely correct. The earliest document recording the sole rule of Cambyses1 is dated on the twelfth day of the sixth month, 530 B.C.; from the Behistun inscription, ? 11, we know that Bardiya revolted on the fourteenth day of the twelfth month (523/22); Cambyses reigned, therefore, six full months of 530/29 plus six full years plus eleven months of 523/22-a total of seven years and five months. A few scribes in Babylonia, as is to be expected, were unaware of Bardiya's revolt; others, of Cambyses' death. The last tablet dated to Cambyses, signed on the twenty-third day of the first month of the eighth year,2 was written by such a scribe. But the scribe who wrote the first extant published tablet of Bardiya knew that the last month of the Babylonian year 523/22 was in itself Bardiya's "accession year"; therefore, he correctly dated a document written in the
来自巴比伦的现有证据,加上来自埃及的证据(见R. A. Parker在本期的文章),明确地证实了大流士登基的传统日期是522/21年。一旦认识到这一点,很明显,来自巴比伦的所有材料都必须以这样或那样的方式融入总体图景。从下面的摘要中可以清楚地看出这一点。希罗多德在第三卷第66-67章中告诉我们,冈比西斯统治了7年零5个月。正如其他人所表明的,这个数字是绝对正确的。最早记录冈比西斯统治的文献记载于公元前530年6月12日;从贝希斯顿铭文来看,?11,我们知道巴迪亚在12月14日起义(523/22);冈比西斯统治了530/29年的6个月加上523/22年的6年加上11个月总共是7年零5个月。正如所料,巴比伦的一些文士并不知道巴蒂亚的叛乱;其他人则认为冈比西斯之死。冈比西斯的最后一块石板是在第八年的第一个月的第二十三天签署的,就是由这样一个抄写员写的。但是,写现存第一块出版的巴迪亚石碑的抄写员知道,巴比伦523/22年的最后一个月本身就是巴迪亚的“登基年”;因此,他正确地标注了一份用英文写的文件的日期