Darius and Xerxes in Babylonia

G. G. Cameron
{"title":"Darius and Xerxes in Babylonia","authors":"G. G. Cameron","doi":"10.1086/370613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The available evidence from Babylonia, supplemented by that from Egypt (see R. A. Parker's article in this issue), definitely confirm the traditional date of 522/21 for the accession year of Darius. Once this is recognized, it is obvious that all the material from Babylonia must fit in one way or another into the general picture. That it does so is clear from the following summary. Herodotus, in Book iii, chapters 66-67, informs us that Cambyses reigned for seven years and five months. As others have shown, this figure is absolutely correct. The earliest document recording the sole rule of Cambyses1 is dated on the twelfth day of the sixth month, 530 B.C.; from the Behistun inscription, ? 11, we know that Bardiya revolted on the fourteenth day of the twelfth month (523/22); Cambyses reigned, therefore, six full months of 530/29 plus six full years plus eleven months of 523/22-a total of seven years and five months. A few scribes in Babylonia, as is to be expected, were unaware of Bardiya's revolt; others, of Cambyses' death. The last tablet dated to Cambyses, signed on the twenty-third day of the first month of the eighth year,2 was written by such a scribe. But the scribe who wrote the first extant published tablet of Bardiya knew that the last month of the Babylonian year 523/22 was in itself Bardiya's \"accession year\"; therefore, he correctly dated a document written in the","PeriodicalId":252942,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Semitic Languages and Literatures","volume":"134 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1941-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"43","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Semitic Languages and Literatures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/370613","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 43

Abstract

The available evidence from Babylonia, supplemented by that from Egypt (see R. A. Parker's article in this issue), definitely confirm the traditional date of 522/21 for the accession year of Darius. Once this is recognized, it is obvious that all the material from Babylonia must fit in one way or another into the general picture. That it does so is clear from the following summary. Herodotus, in Book iii, chapters 66-67, informs us that Cambyses reigned for seven years and five months. As others have shown, this figure is absolutely correct. The earliest document recording the sole rule of Cambyses1 is dated on the twelfth day of the sixth month, 530 B.C.; from the Behistun inscription, ? 11, we know that Bardiya revolted on the fourteenth day of the twelfth month (523/22); Cambyses reigned, therefore, six full months of 530/29 plus six full years plus eleven months of 523/22-a total of seven years and five months. A few scribes in Babylonia, as is to be expected, were unaware of Bardiya's revolt; others, of Cambyses' death. The last tablet dated to Cambyses, signed on the twenty-third day of the first month of the eighth year,2 was written by such a scribe. But the scribe who wrote the first extant published tablet of Bardiya knew that the last month of the Babylonian year 523/22 was in itself Bardiya's "accession year"; therefore, he correctly dated a document written in the
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大流士和薛西斯在巴比伦
来自巴比伦的现有证据,加上来自埃及的证据(见R. A. Parker在本期的文章),明确地证实了大流士登基的传统日期是522/21年。一旦认识到这一点,很明显,来自巴比伦的所有材料都必须以这样或那样的方式融入总体图景。从下面的摘要中可以清楚地看出这一点。希罗多德在第三卷第66-67章中告诉我们,冈比西斯统治了7年零5个月。正如其他人所表明的,这个数字是绝对正确的。最早记录冈比西斯统治的文献记载于公元前530年6月12日;从贝希斯顿铭文来看,?11,我们知道巴迪亚在12月14日起义(523/22);冈比西斯统治了530/29年的6个月加上523/22年的6年加上11个月总共是7年零5个月。正如所料,巴比伦的一些文士并不知道巴蒂亚的叛乱;其他人则认为冈比西斯之死。冈比西斯的最后一块石板是在第八年的第一个月的第二十三天签署的,就是由这样一个抄写员写的。但是,写现存第一块出版的巴迪亚石碑的抄写员知道,巴比伦523/22年的最后一个月本身就是巴迪亚的“登基年”;因此,他正确地标注了一份用英文写的文件的日期
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Darius and His Egyptian Campaign Book Review:The Prophets and Their Times J. M. Powis Smith, William A. Irwin The Oriental Institute Archeological Report on the near East, 1941 The Old Aramaic Alphabet at Tell Halaf the Date of the "Altar" Inscription Hurrian Consonantal Pattern
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1