Peer Support as a Tool for Community Care: “Nothing About Us, Without Us”

Shinjini Bakshi
{"title":"Peer Support as a Tool for Community Care: “Nothing About Us, Without Us”","authors":"Shinjini Bakshi","doi":"10.52214/CSWR.V19I1.7602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the face of socio-political marginalization, frontline communities reclaim power by harnessing peer wisdom and resilience. The year 2020 marked the confluence of a global pandemic and widespread resistance against anti-Black racism and police violence, highlighting the value of peer voices and community perspectives. To dismantle and transcend carceral approaches to community care, the field of social work is invited to join a larger anti-carceral mental health movement that honors lived experience and works alongside peers to build identity-affirming structures of mental health care. This article examines the ways in which frontline communities benefit from expanded access to anti-carceral formal and informal peer support as a mental health safety net that interrupts harm and prioritizes agency, consent, and self-determination. This paper broadens social work’s conceptualization of peer support through theoretical frameworks of anti-carceral social work, abolition, and intersectionality. Social work and its adjacent fields are called to urgently center Black liberation, collective healing, and community care by advocating for the integration of formal and informal peer support into mental health policy and practice. This paper strategically leans into a lineage of critical peer thought scholarship by utilizing footnotes and citations to model the ethical acknowledgment of peer labor within human rights movements. This intentional structure promotes radical solidarity that resists the exploitation of people with lived experience.","PeriodicalId":130000,"journal":{"name":"Columbia Social Work Review","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Columbia Social Work Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52214/CSWR.V19I1.7602","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In the face of socio-political marginalization, frontline communities reclaim power by harnessing peer wisdom and resilience. The year 2020 marked the confluence of a global pandemic and widespread resistance against anti-Black racism and police violence, highlighting the value of peer voices and community perspectives. To dismantle and transcend carceral approaches to community care, the field of social work is invited to join a larger anti-carceral mental health movement that honors lived experience and works alongside peers to build identity-affirming structures of mental health care. This article examines the ways in which frontline communities benefit from expanded access to anti-carceral formal and informal peer support as a mental health safety net that interrupts harm and prioritizes agency, consent, and self-determination. This paper broadens social work’s conceptualization of peer support through theoretical frameworks of anti-carceral social work, abolition, and intersectionality. Social work and its adjacent fields are called to urgently center Black liberation, collective healing, and community care by advocating for the integration of formal and informal peer support into mental health policy and practice. This paper strategically leans into a lineage of critical peer thought scholarship by utilizing footnotes and citations to model the ethical acknowledgment of peer labor within human rights movements. This intentional structure promotes radical solidarity that resists the exploitation of people with lived experience.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
同伴支持作为社区关怀的工具:“没有我们,没有我们”
面对社会政治边缘化,一线社区通过利用同伴的智慧和韧性重新获得权力。2020年标志着全球大流行病与对针对黑人的种族主义和警察暴力的普遍抵制的汇合,突出了同龄人的声音和社区观点的价值。为了在社区护理中废除和超越拘谨的方法,社会工作领域被邀请加入一个更大的反拘谨精神健康运动,该运动尊重生活经验,并与同行一起建立精神卫生保健的身份肯定结构。本文考察了一线社区如何从扩大获得正式和非正式的反暴力同伴支持中获益,这是一种心理健康安全网,可以阻断伤害并优先考虑代理、同意和自决。本文通过反暴力社会工作、废除和交叉性的理论框架,拓宽了社会工作对同伴支持的概念。社会工作及其邻近领域被呼吁通过倡导将正式和非正式的同伴支持整合到精神健康政策和实践中来紧急关注黑人解放、集体治疗和社区护理。本文通过利用脚注和引文来模拟人权运动中同伴劳动的伦理承认,战略性地倾向于批判性同伴思想学术的谱系。这种有意识的结构促进了激进的团结,抵制对有生活经验的人的剥削。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
"Small Victories of Survival in a Deeply Homophobic World": Current Realities and Paths Forward for Substance Use in the LGBTQIA+ Community Where Were the Social Workers? A Historical Overview of the Social Work Profession’s Complicity in the Family Policing System Disability and Self: Critical Factors in Positive Adjustment After the Onset of Disability in Emerging Adulthood Choosing a Frame: How Medusa Tells the Story of Trauma and Life After Trauma New York's Directive for Mental Health Involuntary Removals: The Intersectional Risk for Unhoused New Yorkers with a Serious Mental Illness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1