Sweet potato Weevil (Cylas puncticollis) Boheman Infestation: Cultivar Differences and the Effects of Mulching

A. Mansaray, A. Sundufu, M. Moseray, S. Fomba
{"title":"Sweet potato Weevil (Cylas puncticollis) Boheman Infestation: Cultivar Differences and the Effects of Mulching","authors":"A. Mansaray, A. Sundufu, M. Moseray, S. Fomba","doi":"10.2174/1874407901509010007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The effects of infestation by the sweet potato weevil, Cylas puncticollis Bohemen, on yield in 3 sweet potato cultivars, in relation to different mulching levels were compared. The experiment was laid out in a randomized complete split plot design at three levels. It consisted of a main plot factor, the three sweet potato cultivars (slipot 2, 3 and 4) with mulching at three levels (0, 1, 3 and 5t/ha) as sub plot. The factors were replicated thrice. The results of the studies re- vealed that increase in mulching level resulted in significantly decreased infestation of sweet potato weevil and higher root yield. Mulching at the rate of 5t/ha recorded the least infestation (12.13% for the year 2012; 13.32% for the year 2013) followed by 3t/ha (17.86% for the year 2012; 21.24% for the year 2013), 1t/ha (25.18% for the year 2012; 29.49% for the year 2013) whilst the unmulched plot recorded the highest (35.75% for the year 2012; 41.30% for the year 2013). Root yield was the highest with mulching at the rate of 5t/ha (6242.42Kg/ha for the year 2012; 4828.45Kg/ha for the year 2013) followed by 3t/ha (5863.64Kg/ha for the year 2012; 4883.82Kg/ha for the year 2013), 1t/ha (4580.81Kg/ha for the year 2012; 3818.18Kg/ha for the year 2013) whilst the unmulched plot recorded the highest (4202.03Kg/ha for the year 2012; 3489.89Kg/ha for the year 2013). Significant negative correlation (r = -0.91, p = 0.0001) was observed between weevil root damage and root dry matter. Only two cultivars, Slipot 3 and Slipot 4 were observed to be less susceptible to the sweetpoto weevil. Thus, using mulch cover at the rate of 3- 5t/ha in a field planted with slipot 3 or slipot 4 will in- crease yield, while at same time reduce sweet potato weevil infestation.","PeriodicalId":143634,"journal":{"name":"The Open Entomology Journal","volume":"107 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Entomology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874407901509010007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

The effects of infestation by the sweet potato weevil, Cylas puncticollis Bohemen, on yield in 3 sweet potato cultivars, in relation to different mulching levels were compared. The experiment was laid out in a randomized complete split plot design at three levels. It consisted of a main plot factor, the three sweet potato cultivars (slipot 2, 3 and 4) with mulching at three levels (0, 1, 3 and 5t/ha) as sub plot. The factors were replicated thrice. The results of the studies re- vealed that increase in mulching level resulted in significantly decreased infestation of sweet potato weevil and higher root yield. Mulching at the rate of 5t/ha recorded the least infestation (12.13% for the year 2012; 13.32% for the year 2013) followed by 3t/ha (17.86% for the year 2012; 21.24% for the year 2013), 1t/ha (25.18% for the year 2012; 29.49% for the year 2013) whilst the unmulched plot recorded the highest (35.75% for the year 2012; 41.30% for the year 2013). Root yield was the highest with mulching at the rate of 5t/ha (6242.42Kg/ha for the year 2012; 4828.45Kg/ha for the year 2013) followed by 3t/ha (5863.64Kg/ha for the year 2012; 4883.82Kg/ha for the year 2013), 1t/ha (4580.81Kg/ha for the year 2012; 3818.18Kg/ha for the year 2013) whilst the unmulched plot recorded the highest (4202.03Kg/ha for the year 2012; 3489.89Kg/ha for the year 2013). Significant negative correlation (r = -0.91, p = 0.0001) was observed between weevil root damage and root dry matter. Only two cultivars, Slipot 3 and Slipot 4 were observed to be less susceptible to the sweetpoto weevil. Thus, using mulch cover at the rate of 3- 5t/ha in a field planted with slipot 3 or slipot 4 will in- crease yield, while at same time reduce sweet potato weevil infestation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
甘薯象甲(Cylas puncticollis)波西米亚侵害:品种差异及覆盖效果
比较了不同覆盖水平下甘薯象甲对3个甘薯品种产量的影响。试验采用随机完全分形图设计,分为三个水平。以3个甘薯品种(2、3、4号)为主要小区因子,分别在0、1、3、5t/ hm2 3个水平覆盖,作为次小区。这些因素被重复了三次。结果表明,增加地膜覆盖水平可显著降低甘薯象鼻虫的侵染,提高根产量。覆盖量为5吨/公顷时,2012年虫害最少(12.13%);2013年为13.32%),其次是3吨/公顷(2012年为17.86%;2013年21.24%),1吨/公顷(2012年25.18%;2013年为29.49%),而未覆盖地块的比例最高(2012年为35.75%;2013年为41.30%)。2012年根产量最高,覆盖5t/ha (6242.42Kg/ha);2013年为4828.45公斤/公顷),其次是3吨/公顷(2012年为5863.64公斤/公顷;2013年为4883.82公斤/公顷),2012年为4580.81公斤/公顷;2013年为3818.18Kg/ha),而未覆盖地块记录最高(2012年为4202.03Kg/ha;2013年为3489.89公斤/公顷)。象鼻虫根系损伤与根系干物质呈显著负相关(r = -0.91, p = 0.0001)。只有2个品种,滑钵3号和滑钵4号被观察到对甜马铃薯象鼻虫不那么敏感。因此,在3号或4号滑槽种植的地块上,以3 ~ 5t/ hm2的覆盖量进行地膜覆盖,既能增产,又能减少甘薯象鼻虫的侵害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Larvicidal Activity of a Natural Botanical Biostop Moustiques® andPhysiological Changes Induced in Susceptible and Resistant Strains ofAnopheles gambiae Giles (Diptera: Culicidae) Sweet potato Weevil (Cylas puncticollis) Boheman Infestation: Cultivar Differences and the Effects of Mulching Factors Determining the Host Range of Two Tortoise Beetles, Cassidanebulosa L. and C. piperata Hope (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in Japan Influence of Different Statuses of Honey Bee Queens, Apis mellifera L. on the Ultrastructure of the Flagella on (3-Day Old) Workers Googling Insects as a New Trend in Cultural Entomology: An Italian Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1