A Reply to Hyde, Can Judges Identify Fair Bargaining Procedures?

D. Polsby, M. Freed
{"title":"A Reply to Hyde, Can Judges Identify Fair Bargaining Procedures?","authors":"D. Polsby, M. Freed","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2960729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Professor Alan Hyde believes, and we disbelieve, that giving courts the power to review union contracts for fairness will increase the sum of fairness in the world. We assert that there is no procedural routine that is “fair” in the sense of guaranteeing distributional outcomes.","PeriodicalId":373008,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Collective Bargaining Law (Topic)","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1984-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Collective Bargaining Law (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2960729","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Professor Alan Hyde believes, and we disbelieve, that giving courts the power to review union contracts for fairness will increase the sum of fairness in the world. We assert that there is no procedural routine that is “fair” in the sense of guaranteeing distributional outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法官能否确定公平交易程序?
艾伦·海德教授相信,而我们不相信,赋予法院审查工会合同公平的权力将增加世界公平的总和。我们断言,在保证分配结果的意义上,没有程序程序是“公平的”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Modest Blueprint for Representing Working People and Labor Unions in Fraught Times Economic Democracy in the 21st Century: The Vote in Labour, Capital and Public Services Trade Unions’ Rights, Work Councils’ Functions and the Legal Framework for Governing European Corporations: A Spanish Perspective Brief of Amicus Curiae Professor Samuel Estreicher in Support of Defendants-Appellees in Chamber of Commerce of United States v. City of Seattle, No. 17-35640 (9th Circuit) 2020 Supreme Court Commentary: Employment Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1