Inference on Average Treatment Effect under Minimization and Other Covariate-Adaptive Randomization Methods

T. Ye, Yanyao Yi, J. Shao
{"title":"Inference on Average Treatment Effect under Minimization and Other Covariate-Adaptive Randomization Methods","authors":"T. Ye, Yanyao Yi, J. Shao","doi":"10.1093/BIOMET/ASAB015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Covariate-adaptive randomization schemes such as the minimization and stratified permuted blocks are often applied in clinical trials to balance treatment assignments across prognostic factors. The existing theoretical developments on inference after covariate-adaptive randomization are mostly limited to situations where a correct model between the response and covariates can be specified or the randomization method has well-understood properties. Based on stratification with covariate levels utilized in randomization and a further adjusting for covariates not used in randomization, in this article we propose several estimators for model free inference on average treatment effect defined as the difference between response means under two treatments. We establish asymptotic normality of the proposed estimators under all popular covariate-adaptive randomization schemes including the minimization whose theoretical property is unclear, and we show that the asymptotic distributions are invariant with respect to covariate-adaptive randomization methods. Consistent variance estimators are constructed for asymptotic inference. Asymptotic relative efficiencies and finite sample properties of estimators are also studied. We recommend using one of our proposed estimators for valid and model free inference after covariate-adaptive randomization.","PeriodicalId":186390,"journal":{"name":"arXiv: Methodology","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv: Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/BIOMET/ASAB015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

Covariate-adaptive randomization schemes such as the minimization and stratified permuted blocks are often applied in clinical trials to balance treatment assignments across prognostic factors. The existing theoretical developments on inference after covariate-adaptive randomization are mostly limited to situations where a correct model between the response and covariates can be specified or the randomization method has well-understood properties. Based on stratification with covariate levels utilized in randomization and a further adjusting for covariates not used in randomization, in this article we propose several estimators for model free inference on average treatment effect defined as the difference between response means under two treatments. We establish asymptotic normality of the proposed estimators under all popular covariate-adaptive randomization schemes including the minimization whose theoretical property is unclear, and we show that the asymptotic distributions are invariant with respect to covariate-adaptive randomization methods. Consistent variance estimators are constructed for asymptotic inference. Asymptotic relative efficiencies and finite sample properties of estimators are also studied. We recommend using one of our proposed estimators for valid and model free inference after covariate-adaptive randomization.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
最小化和其他协变量自适应随机化方法下平均治疗效果的推论
协变量自适应随机化方案,如最小化和分层排列块,经常应用于临床试验中,以平衡预后因素之间的治疗分配。现有的关于协变量自适应随机化后推理的理论发展,大多局限于响应与协变量之间可以确定正确的模型,或者随机化方法具有很好理解的性质。基于随机化中使用协变量水平的分层和对随机化中未使用的协变量的进一步调整,在本文中,我们提出了几个估计量,用于对平均治疗效果的无模型推断,平均治疗效果定义为两种治疗下反应均值之间的差异。我们在所有流行的协变量自适应随机化方案下建立了所提估计量的渐近正态性,包括理论性质尚不清楚的最小化方案,并证明了这些估计量的渐近分布对于协变量自适应随机化方法是不变的。对渐近推理构造了一致方差估计量。研究了估计量的渐近相对效率和有限样本性质。我们建议在协变量自适应随机化后使用我们提出的一个估计器进行有效的和无模型的推理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Revisiting Empirical Bayes Methods and Applications to Special Types of Data Flexible Bayesian modelling of concomitant covariate effects in mixture models A Critique of Differential Abundance Analysis, and Advocacy for an Alternative Post-Processing of MCMC Conditional variance estimator for sufficient dimension reduction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1