Tamsulosin versus Fluid Therapy in Management of Ureteric Stone: A Comparative Study

B. Adhikari, R. Kidwai
{"title":"Tamsulosin versus Fluid Therapy in Management of Ureteric Stone: A Comparative Study","authors":"B. Adhikari, R. Kidwai","doi":"10.3126/jngmc.v20i1.48318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Almost all ureteric stone migrates from kidney. The drugs commonly used to assist in the passage of bigger calculi include alpha-blockers, calcium channel antagonists, phosphodiesterase inhibitors, corticosteroids. Tamsulosin is an alpha-1 adrenergic receptor antagonist known to augment the stone expulsion rate. \nAims: To evaluate the efficacy of Tamsulosin versus fluid therapy in management of urolithiasis. \nMethods: The study was carried out on 100 patients (divided into 2 groups) at Nepalgunj Medical college Hospital Nepalgunj from May 2020 to April 2021,between 18-50 years of age of either sex, presenting with a symptomatic urinary calculus as demonstrated on imaging. Group 1 received 0.4mg of tablet tamsulosin once daily for 4 weeks, whereas Group 2 fluid therapy for a period of 4 weeks or until expulsion of stone. \nResults: Group A reflected 88% (40 patients) expulsion rate, whereas Group B reflected 72.0% (36 patients) expulsion rate. There was a statistically significant difference in the expulsion rate amongst both the groups. 92.0% (46 patients) subjects in Group A demonstrated stone expulsion within 4 weeks, mean time being 8 days. In comparison only 70.0% (35 patients) subjects in Group B demonstrated stone expulsion within 4 weeks, mean time being 14 days.Use of tablet diclofenec 100mg was lower in Group A in comparison to Group B. \nConclusion: Tamsulosin is a safe and effective pharmacological agent in management of ureteric stones as it known to increase overall stone expulsion rate, reduced stone expulsion time, decrease acute attacks by acting as a spasmolytic, and fewer pain episodes. It may be considered as a conservative therapeutic option before more invasive procedures like ureteroscopic removal or Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.","PeriodicalId":166882,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nepalgunj Medical College","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nepalgunj Medical College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/jngmc.v20i1.48318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Almost all ureteric stone migrates from kidney. The drugs commonly used to assist in the passage of bigger calculi include alpha-blockers, calcium channel antagonists, phosphodiesterase inhibitors, corticosteroids. Tamsulosin is an alpha-1 adrenergic receptor antagonist known to augment the stone expulsion rate. Aims: To evaluate the efficacy of Tamsulosin versus fluid therapy in management of urolithiasis. Methods: The study was carried out on 100 patients (divided into 2 groups) at Nepalgunj Medical college Hospital Nepalgunj from May 2020 to April 2021,between 18-50 years of age of either sex, presenting with a symptomatic urinary calculus as demonstrated on imaging. Group 1 received 0.4mg of tablet tamsulosin once daily for 4 weeks, whereas Group 2 fluid therapy for a period of 4 weeks or until expulsion of stone. Results: Group A reflected 88% (40 patients) expulsion rate, whereas Group B reflected 72.0% (36 patients) expulsion rate. There was a statistically significant difference in the expulsion rate amongst both the groups. 92.0% (46 patients) subjects in Group A demonstrated stone expulsion within 4 weeks, mean time being 8 days. In comparison only 70.0% (35 patients) subjects in Group B demonstrated stone expulsion within 4 weeks, mean time being 14 days.Use of tablet diclofenec 100mg was lower in Group A in comparison to Group B. Conclusion: Tamsulosin is a safe and effective pharmacological agent in management of ureteric stones as it known to increase overall stone expulsion rate, reduced stone expulsion time, decrease acute attacks by acting as a spasmolytic, and fewer pain episodes. It may be considered as a conservative therapeutic option before more invasive procedures like ureteroscopic removal or Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
坦索罗辛与输液治疗输尿管结石的比较研究
导读:几乎所有的输尿管结石都是从肾脏转移过来的。通常用于帮助较大结石通过的药物包括-受体阻滞剂、钙通道拮抗剂、磷酸二酯酶抑制剂、皮质类固醇。坦索罗辛是一种α -1肾上腺素能受体拮抗剂,已知可增加结石排出率。目的:评价坦索罗辛与液体疗法治疗尿石症的疗效。方法:研究于2020年5月至2021年4月在尼泊尔医学院医院尼泊尔医院进行的100例患者(分为两组),年龄在18-50岁之间,男女不限,影像学显示有症状性尿路结石。1组患者给予坦索罗辛片剂0.4mg,每日1次,连用4周;2组患者给予液体治疗,连用4周或直至排出结石。结果:A组40例驱逐率为88%,B组36例驱逐率为72.0%。两组之间的开除率有统计学上的显著差异。A组46例(92.0%)患者在4周内结石排出,平均时间为8天。相比之下,B组只有70.0%(35例)患者在4周内出现结石排出,平均时间为14天。结论:坦索罗辛是一种安全有效的治疗输尿管结石的药物,因为它可以增加结石排出率,缩短结石排出时间,通过解痉剂减少急性发作,减少疼痛发作。在诸如输尿管镜切除或体外冲击波碎石等侵入性手术之前,它可以被视为一种保守的治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Study of the Relationship of Lipid Profile, BMI and Blood Pressure among Non-diabetic Hypertensive Patients - A Hospital Based Study Comparative Study of Opioid Free versus Opioid Anaesthesia in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Radiopathological Correlation in Diagnosis of Adnexal Lesions: A Hospital Based Comparative Study Correlation of Mastoid Pneumatization with Middle Ear Pathology in Unilateral Squamous Type of Chronic Otitis Media Functional Outcome of Isolated Middle to Distal Third Ulnar Shaft Fracture in Adults with Square Nail Fixation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1