Who Engages in Water Scarcity Conflicts? A Field Experiment with Irrigators in Semi-Arid Africa

Els Lecoutere, Ben d’Exelle, Bjorn Van Campenhout
{"title":"Who Engages in Water Scarcity Conflicts? A Field Experiment with Irrigators in Semi-Arid Africa","authors":"Els Lecoutere, Ben d’Exelle, Bjorn Van Campenhout","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1660491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Does water scarcity induce conflict? And who would engage in a water scarcity conflict? In this paper we look for evidence of the relation between water scarcity and conflictive behavior. With a framed field experiment conducted with smallholder irrigators from semi-arid Tanzania that replicates appropriation from an occasionally scarce common water flow we assess what type of water users is more inclined to react in conflictive way to scarcity. On average, water scarcity induces selfish appropriation behavior in the experiment which is regarded conflictive in the Tanzanian irrigator communities where strong noncompetition norms regulate irrigation water distribution. But not all react to water scarcity in the same way. Poor, marginalized, dissocialized irrigators with low human capital and with higher stakes are most likely to react with conflictive appropriation behavior to water scarcity. Viewed a political ecology perspective we conclude that circumstances in Tanzania are conducive to resource scarcity conflicts. Water scarcity and water values are increasing. Water governance institutions entail exclusionary elements. Moreover, a higher likelihood to react in a conflictive way to water scarcity coincides with real economic and political inequalities which could form a basis for mobilization for more violent ways of competing for scarce resources.","PeriodicalId":127641,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Conflict; Conflict Resolution; Alliances (Topic)","volume":"235 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Conflict; Conflict Resolution; Alliances (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1660491","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

Abstract

Does water scarcity induce conflict? And who would engage in a water scarcity conflict? In this paper we look for evidence of the relation between water scarcity and conflictive behavior. With a framed field experiment conducted with smallholder irrigators from semi-arid Tanzania that replicates appropriation from an occasionally scarce common water flow we assess what type of water users is more inclined to react in conflictive way to scarcity. On average, water scarcity induces selfish appropriation behavior in the experiment which is regarded conflictive in the Tanzanian irrigator communities where strong noncompetition norms regulate irrigation water distribution. But not all react to water scarcity in the same way. Poor, marginalized, dissocialized irrigators with low human capital and with higher stakes are most likely to react with conflictive appropriation behavior to water scarcity. Viewed a political ecology perspective we conclude that circumstances in Tanzania are conducive to resource scarcity conflicts. Water scarcity and water values are increasing. Water governance institutions entail exclusionary elements. Moreover, a higher likelihood to react in a conflictive way to water scarcity coincides with real economic and political inequalities which could form a basis for mobilization for more violent ways of competing for scarce resources.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
谁参与了水资源短缺冲突?半干旱非洲农田灌溉试验
缺水会引发冲突吗?谁会卷入水资源短缺的冲突?在本文中,我们寻找水资源短缺和冲突行为之间关系的证据。通过对来自半干旱的坦桑尼亚的小农灌溉者进行的一项有框架的实地试验,复制了偶尔稀缺的普通水流的挪用,我们评估了哪种类型的水用户更倾向于以冲突的方式应对稀缺。平均而言,在实验中,水资源短缺导致了自私的挪用行为,这在坦桑尼亚灌溉社区被认为是冲突的,在那里,强有力的非竞争规范规范了灌溉用水的分配。但并非所有国家对水资源短缺的反应都是一样的。贫穷的、被边缘化的、离间的、人力资本少、风险高的灌溉者最有可能对缺水采取冲突性的占用行为。从政治生态学的角度来看,我们得出结论,坦桑尼亚的情况有利于资源稀缺冲突。水资源短缺和水的价值正在增加。水治理机构包含排他性因素。此外,以冲突的方式对缺水作出反应的可能性较高,与实际的经济和政治不平等同时发生,这可能成为动员以更暴力的方式争夺稀缺资源的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Good Governance as a Panacea for Conflicts and Agitations in the Niger-Delta Region of Nigeria Mechanism of Institutional Transition and Local Decentralization of Power through Civil-Wars and Internal-Conflicts: A Model and Comparative History Political and Economic Consequences of Humanitarian Military Interventions in Targeted Nations An Economic Theory of Political Revolutions Costs of Civil War and Fragile States in Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1