Ability of MRI Diagnostic Value to Detect the Evidence of Physiotherapy Outcome Measurements in Dealing with Calf Muscles Tearing

Muntaser S. Ahmad, Azzam Arab
{"title":"Ability of MRI Diagnostic Value to Detect the Evidence of Physiotherapy Outcome Measurements in Dealing with Calf Muscles Tearing","authors":"Muntaser S. Ahmad, Azzam Arab","doi":"10.33425/2639-944x.1292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Calf muscle tearing is one of the most sudden pain that affects the calf, foot, or thigh area. It can be diagnosed through Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and treated through physiotherapy interventions. The aim of the current study is to evaluate and assess the efficiency of physiotherapy interventions using Myofascial release and Stretching exercises in calf muscle treatment, and verification this effectiveness by traditional physiotherapy measurement tools and MRI. Methods: The study included 30 patients with at least one degree tearing of the calf muscles. All patients were undergoing leg MRI imaging using a 1.5 Tesla MRI. The Visual analogue scales (VAS) and Functional disability scale for ankle (FADI) were assessed before the patients were offered therapies. Then the patients were randomly distributed into two groups: the first group was 15 patients who were given Myofascial release treatment, while the second group was 15 patients who were given treatment using Stretching exercises. After treatment, the efficacy of treatment was checked for patients by different tools: VAS, FADI, and MR imaging. Patients' outcomes before and after treatment were compared. Results: The results showed that both Myofascial release and Stretching exercises had the same effect on patients. Comparison between pre- and post-score within groups for VAS, FADI, and MRI findings. Whereas, all P value values were less than 0.05 for all samples. When comparing the techniques presented for treatment between the two groups, the results showed that there were no differences between the two techniques in each of the VAS, FADI, and MRI findings, where the P-values post-treatment were 0.644, 0.112, and 0.831, respectively. Conclusion: Myofascial release and Stretching exercises can be used to treat calf muscle tears in the sub-acute stages.","PeriodicalId":443242,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical – Clinical Research & Reviews","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical – Clinical Research & Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33425/2639-944x.1292","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Calf muscle tearing is one of the most sudden pain that affects the calf, foot, or thigh area. It can be diagnosed through Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and treated through physiotherapy interventions. The aim of the current study is to evaluate and assess the efficiency of physiotherapy interventions using Myofascial release and Stretching exercises in calf muscle treatment, and verification this effectiveness by traditional physiotherapy measurement tools and MRI. Methods: The study included 30 patients with at least one degree tearing of the calf muscles. All patients were undergoing leg MRI imaging using a 1.5 Tesla MRI. The Visual analogue scales (VAS) and Functional disability scale for ankle (FADI) were assessed before the patients were offered therapies. Then the patients were randomly distributed into two groups: the first group was 15 patients who were given Myofascial release treatment, while the second group was 15 patients who were given treatment using Stretching exercises. After treatment, the efficacy of treatment was checked for patients by different tools: VAS, FADI, and MR imaging. Patients' outcomes before and after treatment were compared. Results: The results showed that both Myofascial release and Stretching exercises had the same effect on patients. Comparison between pre- and post-score within groups for VAS, FADI, and MRI findings. Whereas, all P value values were less than 0.05 for all samples. When comparing the techniques presented for treatment between the two groups, the results showed that there were no differences between the two techniques in each of the VAS, FADI, and MRI findings, where the P-values post-treatment were 0.644, 0.112, and 0.831, respectively. Conclusion: Myofascial release and Stretching exercises can be used to treat calf muscle tears in the sub-acute stages.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在处理小腿肌肉撕裂时,MRI诊断价值检测物理治疗结果测量证据的能力
背景:小腿肌肉撕裂是影响小腿、足部或大腿区域的最突然的疼痛之一。它可以通过磁共振成像(MRI)诊断,并通过物理治疗干预治疗。本研究的目的是评估和评估使用肌筋膜释放和拉伸练习进行小腿肌肉治疗的物理治疗干预的有效性,并通过传统物理治疗测量工具和MRI验证其有效性。方法:本研究包括30例小腿肌肉至少程度撕裂的患者。所有患者均使用1.5特斯拉MRI进行腿部MRI成像。治疗前对患者进行视觉模拟评分(VAS)和踝关节功能障碍评分(FADI)。然后将患者随机分为两组:第一组15例患者给予肌筋膜松解治疗,第二组15例患者给予伸展运动治疗。治疗后,通过不同的工具检查患者的治疗效果:VAS、FADI和MR成像。比较治疗前后患者的预后。结果:肌筋膜松解和伸展运动对患者有相同的效果。组内VAS、FADI和MRI评分前后的比较。然而,所有样本的P值均小于0.05。在比较两组治疗方法时,结果显示两种治疗方法在VAS、FADI和MRI上的表现均无差异,治疗后p值分别为0.644、0.112和0.831。结论:肌筋膜松解和拉伸训练可用于治疗亚急性期小腿肌肉撕裂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Case of a Cambodian man with Disabilities who Received Rehabilitative Education Support (Dohsa-hou) and Realized Social Participation Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Waves, Treatment Enclaves and Changes in Management Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis with Physiotherapy during a Clinical Trial: Comparison of Mobilization Technique and Shock Wave Ability of MRI Diagnostic Value to Detect the Evidence of Physiotherapy Outcome Measurements in Dealing with Calf Muscles Tearing Faculty Scholarship at an Academic Health System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1