Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation versus Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation as neuromodulatory techniques in stroke rehabilitation

María Antonia Fuentes Calderón, Laura Olmedo Jiménez, M. Sánchez-Ledesma
{"title":"Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation versus Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation as neuromodulatory techniques in stroke rehabilitation","authors":"María Antonia Fuentes Calderón, Laura Olmedo Jiménez, M. Sánchez-Ledesma","doi":"10.1145/3284179.3284251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation are two techniques of non-invasive brain stimulation which principal mechanism of action is the cortical excitability modulation. The objective of this study is to perform an updated descriptive review of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) analyzing the similarities and differences of their therapeutic applications in the rehabilitation of some of the most relevant neurological deficits consecutive to the stroke. Both TMS and tDCS favor the neurological recovery in the chronic phase of stroke. Until the moment, no differences have been published between both procedures in these cases after analyzing the published in relation to its effectiveness over motor dysfunction, aphasia or dysphagia. Clinical studies with greater number of participants and protocols standardized could outline this assessment in future studies.","PeriodicalId":370465,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality","volume":"136 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3284179.3284251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation are two techniques of non-invasive brain stimulation which principal mechanism of action is the cortical excitability modulation. The objective of this study is to perform an updated descriptive review of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) analyzing the similarities and differences of their therapeutic applications in the rehabilitation of some of the most relevant neurological deficits consecutive to the stroke. Both TMS and tDCS favor the neurological recovery in the chronic phase of stroke. Until the moment, no differences have been published between both procedures in these cases after analyzing the published in relation to its effectiveness over motor dysfunction, aphasia or dysphagia. Clinical studies with greater number of participants and protocols standardized could outline this assessment in future studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经颅磁刺激与经颅直流电刺激作为脑卒中康复中的神经调节技术
经颅磁刺激和经颅直流电刺激是两种以皮层兴奋性调节为主要作用机制的无创脑刺激技术。本研究的目的是对经颅磁刺激(TMS)和经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)进行最新的描述性回顾,分析它们在中风后一些最相关的神经功能障碍的康复治疗应用中的异同。TMS和tDCS均有利于脑卒中慢性期神经系统的恢复。到目前为止,在分析了已发表的有关其对运动功能障碍,失语或吞咽困难的有效性后,在这些病例中,两种方法之间没有差异。更多参与者和标准化协议的临床研究可以在未来的研究中概述这一评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A complete psychophysiological profile of a Paralympic athlete in a ultraendurance: A case study Design and prototyping by additive manufacturing of a functional splint for rehabilitation of Achilles tendon intrasubstance rupture Experience in the implementation of projects in professional environment in a 1st cycle of studies of Civil Engineering Development and use of mobile technologies that foster students' evaluative judgement: a design-based research Academic digital books: The publishing industry VS Openness in book reading
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1