{"title":"Make It New","authors":"Deepika Bahri","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199980963.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In considering Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things (1997), the author observes that time is a central preoccupation in the novel. But how does postcolonialism situate itself in relation to a temporality whose structure, logic, and rhythm have been defined by the West and the experience of colonization? Roy responds to this problem by examining the figure of the Kathakali man, a native storyteller who uses dance, movement, and costume to relate stories derived from the Indian epics, the Mahabharata and Ramayana. Like the stories of the Kathakali man, Roy’s own narrative is disjunctive and recursive, generating a temporal scheme that is at once static and dynamic. Such a handling of time enables Roy to construct what the author calls a “postcolonial modernism,” which employs the formal devices of modernism to arrive at a more genuinely postcolonial engagement with the past and its historical traumas.","PeriodicalId":105749,"journal":{"name":"Modernism, Postcolonialism, and Globalism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modernism, Postcolonialism, and Globalism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199980963.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In considering Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things (1997), the author observes that time is a central preoccupation in the novel. But how does postcolonialism situate itself in relation to a temporality whose structure, logic, and rhythm have been defined by the West and the experience of colonization? Roy responds to this problem by examining the figure of the Kathakali man, a native storyteller who uses dance, movement, and costume to relate stories derived from the Indian epics, the Mahabharata and Ramayana. Like the stories of the Kathakali man, Roy’s own narrative is disjunctive and recursive, generating a temporal scheme that is at once static and dynamic. Such a handling of time enables Roy to construct what the author calls a “postcolonial modernism,” which employs the formal devices of modernism to arrive at a more genuinely postcolonial engagement with the past and its historical traumas.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
让它焕然一新
在考虑阿兰达蒂·罗伊的《小事物之神》(1997)时,作者注意到时间是小说的中心关注点。但是,在后殖民主义如何定位自己与一个由西方和殖民经验定义的结构、逻辑和节奏的暂时性?罗伊通过研究卡塔卡里人的形象来回答这个问题,卡塔卡里人是一个土著讲故事的人,他们用舞蹈、动作和服装来讲述来自印度史诗《摩诃婆罗多》和《罗摩衍那》的故事。就像那个卡塔卡里人的故事一样,罗伊自己的叙述是分离的、递归的,产生了一种既静态又动态的时间格局。这种对时间的处理使罗伊能够构建作者所谓的“后殖民现代主义”,它采用现代主义的正式手段,以一种更真实的后殖民方式与过去及其历史创伤进行接触。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Rushdie and the Art of Modernism Interior History, Tempered Selves Samuel Beckett and the Colonial Gag Reading Ngũgĩ Reading Conrad Modernism in Chinua Achebe’s African Tetralogy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1