Assessment of Understanding the Concept of Motion Mechanics Using Multi Representation

W. Bunawan, Sabani Sabani, Sahyar Sahyar
{"title":"Assessment of Understanding the Concept of Motion Mechanics Using Multi Representation","authors":"W. Bunawan, Sabani Sabani, Sahyar Sahyar","doi":"10.4108/eai.18-10-2018.2287371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Assessment of understanding the concept of physics is done using a three-level multiple choice test. The aim is to measure understanding of the concept, the reasons underlying the determination of the measured concept and the confidence in confirming the relationship between the truth of concept knowledge and reason for answering. The construct of the item involves multi representations (verbal, formal, graphic, and numeric) by connecting two representations in one item. The development of the problem considers three validities, namely content, construct and user validity. Test reliability uses the Cronbach alpha formula. The results showed that the content validity considered by the validator had fulfilled the validity requirements according to the proposed method. Content validity reviews the correlation between the concept content of one representation and other relevant or interrelated concept representations. Validity from the user considers the empirical understanding between the representation of concept components assessed and the representation of reasons relevant to improvements in terms of language and content correlation understanding. Data from each item can be used to trace whether there is a misunderstanding concept or the presence of alternative concepts","PeriodicalId":240056,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Proceedings of The 5th Annual International Seminar on Trends in Science and Science Education, AISTSSE 2018, 18-19 October 2018, Medan, Indonesia","volume":"150 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Proceedings of The 5th Annual International Seminar on Trends in Science and Science Education, AISTSSE 2018, 18-19 October 2018, Medan, Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.18-10-2018.2287371","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Assessment of understanding the concept of physics is done using a three-level multiple choice test. The aim is to measure understanding of the concept, the reasons underlying the determination of the measured concept and the confidence in confirming the relationship between the truth of concept knowledge and reason for answering. The construct of the item involves multi representations (verbal, formal, graphic, and numeric) by connecting two representations in one item. The development of the problem considers three validities, namely content, construct and user validity. Test reliability uses the Cronbach alpha formula. The results showed that the content validity considered by the validator had fulfilled the validity requirements according to the proposed method. Content validity reviews the correlation between the concept content of one representation and other relevant or interrelated concept representations. Validity from the user considers the empirical understanding between the representation of concept components assessed and the representation of reasons relevant to improvements in terms of language and content correlation understanding. Data from each item can be used to trace whether there is a misunderstanding concept or the presence of alternative concepts
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运用多表示法理解运动力学概念的评估
对物理概念理解程度的评估采用三级选择题测试。其目的是衡量对概念的理解,决定被测量概念的原因,以及确认概念知识的真实性与回答原因之间关系的信心。项目的结构通过在一个项目中连接两种表征来涉及多种表征(口头的、形式的、图形的和数字的)。问题的发展考虑了三种效度,即内容效度、结构效度和用户效度。测试信度使用Cronbach alpha公式。结果表明,根据所提出的方法,验证器所考虑的内容效度满足了效度要求。内容效度评估一个表征的概念内容与其他相关或相互关联的概念表征之间的相关性。来自用户的效度考虑了被评估的概念成分的表征和与语言和内容相关性理解方面的改进相关的原因表征之间的经验理解。来自每个项目的数据可以用来追踪是否存在误解概念或替代概念的存在
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contribution of Multiple Intelligence to Students’ Biology Learning Outcomes in whole MAN (Madrasah Aliyah Negeri) Medan Structural and Optical Properties of Er3+ Doped Sodium Phosphate Glasses System for Laser Medium Candidate School Violence Prevention Through Counseling Service Using Problem-Solving Approach to Improve Students’ Self Control Comparison of The Implementation of Direct Instruction, Problem-Based Instruction, and Cooperative Learning using Cabri 3D on Geometry Analysis of the Conditional Verb in the Novel I’ete Des Luci
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1