Economizing the Uneconomic: Markets for Reliable, Sustainable, and Price Efficient Electricity

M. Rasouli, D. Teneketzis
{"title":"Economizing the Uneconomic: Markets for Reliable, Sustainable, and Price Efficient Electricity","authors":"M. Rasouli, D. Teneketzis","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3140080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Current electricity markets do not efficiently achieve policy targets i.e., sustainability, reliability, and price efficiency. Thus, there are debates on how to achieve these targets by using either market mechanisms e.g., carbon and capacity markets, or non-market mechanisms such as offer-caps, price-caps, and market-monitoring. At the same time, major industry changes including demand response management technologies and large scale batteries bring more elasticity to demand; such changes will impact the methodology needed to achieve the above mentioned targets. This work provides market solutions that capture all three policy targets simultaneously and take into account the above-mentioned industry changes. The proposed solutions are based on: (i) a model of electricity markets that captures all the above mentioned electricity policy targets; (ii) mechanism design and the development of a framework for design of efficient auctions with constraints (individual, joint homogeneous, and joint non-homogeneous). The results show that, within the context of the proposed model, all policy targets can be achieved efficiently by separate capacity and carbon markets in addition to efficient spot markets. The results also highlight that all three policy targets can be achieved without any offer-cap, price-cap, or market monitoring. Thus, within the context of the proposed model, they provide clear answers to the above-mentioned policy debates.","PeriodicalId":275253,"journal":{"name":"Operations Research eJournal","volume":"10 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operations Research eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3140080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Current electricity markets do not efficiently achieve policy targets i.e., sustainability, reliability, and price efficiency. Thus, there are debates on how to achieve these targets by using either market mechanisms e.g., carbon and capacity markets, or non-market mechanisms such as offer-caps, price-caps, and market-monitoring. At the same time, major industry changes including demand response management technologies and large scale batteries bring more elasticity to demand; such changes will impact the methodology needed to achieve the above mentioned targets. This work provides market solutions that capture all three policy targets simultaneously and take into account the above-mentioned industry changes. The proposed solutions are based on: (i) a model of electricity markets that captures all the above mentioned electricity policy targets; (ii) mechanism design and the development of a framework for design of efficient auctions with constraints (individual, joint homogeneous, and joint non-homogeneous). The results show that, within the context of the proposed model, all policy targets can be achieved efficiently by separate capacity and carbon markets in addition to efficient spot markets. The results also highlight that all three policy targets can be achieved without any offer-cap, price-cap, or market monitoring. Thus, within the context of the proposed model, they provide clear answers to the above-mentioned policy debates.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
节约不经济:可靠、可持续和价格高效的电力市场
目前的电力市场并没有有效地实现政策目标,即可持续性、可靠性和价格效率。因此,关于如何通过使用市场机制(如碳和能力市场)或非市场机制(如供价上限、价格上限和市场监测)来实现这些目标存在争论。与此同时,包括需求响应管理技术和大规模电池在内的重大行业变革为需求带来了更大的弹性;这些变化将影响实现上述目标所需的方法。这项工作提供了同时捕捉所有三个政策目标并考虑到上述行业变化的市场解决方案。建议的解决方案基于:(i)电力市场模型,该模型涵盖了上述所有电力政策目标;(ii)机制设计和框架开发,以设计具有约束的有效拍卖(单个、联合均质和联合非均质)。结果表明,在该模型的背景下,除了有效的现货市场外,单独的产能和碳市场可以有效地实现所有政策目标。研究结果还强调,这三个政策目标都可以在没有要约上限、价格上限或市场监督的情况下实现。因此,在拟议模式的范围内,它们为上述政策辩论提供了明确的答案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On the Performance of Certainty-equivalent Pricing Optimal Policies for a Multi-Echelon Inventory Problem with Service Time Target and Expediting Robust Epidemiological Prediction and Optimization Strategic Alliances and Lending Relationships Role of Production Efficiency: Inventory Leanness and Financial Outcome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1