Human Computer Interfaces and discourse analysis: Addressing audience with engineers

J. Jeyaraj, Ronald T. Sones, Jacquelyn Waters
{"title":"Human Computer Interfaces and discourse analysis: Addressing audience with engineers","authors":"J. Jeyaraj, Ronald T. Sones, Jacquelyn Waters","doi":"10.1109/IPCC.2011.6087211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"User interface designers may, based on the form content binary, emphasize form to the detriment of content. This creates the possibility of creating interfaces that are technically sound but weak in content. Addressing audience, in addition to form and content brings the potential to bridge the divide between form and content. The factor of audience, while considered from different perspectives in the technical sub-discipline of computer science known as Human Computer Interaction (HCI) and traditional composition courses, the blend of this instruction for engineers often leads to complication. Attention to audience in an engineering curriculum has shown to improve the resulting interfaces designed by students. Even though instruction in audience consideration provides for interface design that may not always successfully address the difficulties associated with the form content binary, classroom experience indicates that has reasonable potential to bridge this disconnect.","PeriodicalId":404833,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPCC.2011.6087211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

User interface designers may, based on the form content binary, emphasize form to the detriment of content. This creates the possibility of creating interfaces that are technically sound but weak in content. Addressing audience, in addition to form and content brings the potential to bridge the divide between form and content. The factor of audience, while considered from different perspectives in the technical sub-discipline of computer science known as Human Computer Interaction (HCI) and traditional composition courses, the blend of this instruction for engineers often leads to complication. Attention to audience in an engineering curriculum has shown to improve the resulting interfaces designed by students. Even though instruction in audience consideration provides for interface design that may not always successfully address the difficulties associated with the form content binary, classroom experience indicates that has reasonable potential to bridge this disconnect.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人机界面与语篇分析:与工程师讨论听众
用户界面设计者可能会基于表单内容二进制,强调表单而忽略内容。这就有可能创造出技术上合理但内容薄弱的界面。针对观众,除了形式和内容之外,还可以弥合形式和内容之间的鸿沟。虽然从计算机科学的技术分支学科——人机交互(HCI)和传统作曲课程的不同角度来考虑听众的因素,但这种对工程师的指导往往会导致复杂性。工程课程中对听众的关注已被证明可以改善学生设计的界面。尽管考虑受众的指导提供的界面设计可能并不总是成功地解决与形式内容二元相关的困难,但课堂经验表明,它有合理的潜力弥合这种脱节。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Granola-eating, Birkenstock-wearing tree-huggers who want to take your guns: Reframing the rhetoric of sustainable agriculture Mobile ICT literacy: A contributor for environmental sustainability The systematic literature review as a research genre Analyzing the interplay between visual-verbal rhetorical strategies in multimodal documents Informal communication, sustainability, and the public writing work of organizations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1