Ethical Tech Pedagogy for Public Good: A Review of Educational Initiatives and Approaches

Jason Lajoie, Alexi Orchard, Heather A. Love
{"title":"Ethical Tech Pedagogy for Public Good: A Review of Educational Initiatives and Approaches","authors":"Jason Lajoie, Alexi Orchard, Heather A. Love","doi":"10.1109/ISTAS50296.2020.9462181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our research team is conducting a scoping literature review of scholarly and popular publications that address the role of ethics and ethical thinking in relation to engineering education curriculum, professional engineering practices more broadly, and their integration in the tech sector at large. This paper reports on the preliminary results of that review, which so far covers current approaches (i.e. from the last ten years) to cultivating and scaling these principles in academia and industry, and also examines local initiatives that implement some of these ideas in the classroom. We (a) identify recent knowledge and gaps on effective approaches to embedding ethics in engineering curriculum, including pedagogies that mobilize novel collaborative instruments and technologies for engaging the public; and (b) describe current academic approaches to centering ethics and ethical thinking as core elements of training and professional practice at the University of Waterloo (Ontario, Canada). In keeping with the 2021 ISTAS “Public Interest Technology” theme, the paper emphasizes efforts underway to train professional and aspiring engineers in North America with the integrated critical thinking skills they need to ethically assess the social and cultural impacts of the technologies they design, develop, and deploy.","PeriodicalId":196560,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAS50296.2020.9462181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Our research team is conducting a scoping literature review of scholarly and popular publications that address the role of ethics and ethical thinking in relation to engineering education curriculum, professional engineering practices more broadly, and their integration in the tech sector at large. This paper reports on the preliminary results of that review, which so far covers current approaches (i.e. from the last ten years) to cultivating and scaling these principles in academia and industry, and also examines local initiatives that implement some of these ideas in the classroom. We (a) identify recent knowledge and gaps on effective approaches to embedding ethics in engineering curriculum, including pedagogies that mobilize novel collaborative instruments and technologies for engaging the public; and (b) describe current academic approaches to centering ethics and ethical thinking as core elements of training and professional practice at the University of Waterloo (Ontario, Canada). In keeping with the 2021 ISTAS “Public Interest Technology” theme, the paper emphasizes efforts underway to train professional and aspiring engineers in North America with the integrated critical thinking skills they need to ethically assess the social and cultural impacts of the technologies they design, develop, and deploy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
面向公共利益的伦理技术教育学:教育倡议与方法综述
我们的研究团队正在对学术和流行出版物进行范围文献综述,这些出版物涉及伦理和伦理思维在工程教育课程、更广泛的专业工程实践以及它们在整个技术领域的整合方面的作用。本文报告了该审查的初步结果,该审查迄今为止涵盖了在学术界和工业界培养和扩展这些原则的当前方法(即从过去十年开始),并检查了在课堂上实施这些想法的地方倡议。我们(a)确定在工程课程中嵌入伦理学的有效方法方面的最新知识和差距,包括动员新颖的协作工具和技术以吸引公众的教学法;(b)描述目前滑铁卢大学(加拿大安大略省)将伦理和伦理思维作为培训和专业实践核心要素的学术方法。为了与2021年ISTAS的“公共利益技术”主题保持一致,该文件强调了正在努力培养北美专业和有抱负的工程师,他们需要具备综合批判性思维技能,以道德地评估他们设计,开发和部署的技术的社会和文化影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Historical and Ideological Chasm between Engineering and Development Sustainability means inclusivity: engaging citizens in early stage smart city development Taiwan’s Ability to Reduce the Transmission of COVID-19: A Success Story Tesseract Optimization for Data Privacy and Sharing Economics Using Open Source Licensing to Regulate the Assembly of LAWS: A Preliminary Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1