Mobbing Perceptions of Academic Staff

Nilüfer Rüzgar
{"title":"Mobbing Perceptions of Academic Staff","authors":"Nilüfer Rüzgar","doi":"10.26466/opusjsr.1191308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mobbing is defined as psychological attack to the individuals. In this sense, mobbing behaviour is especially applied to employees in both public and private organizations and generally inferiors are exposed to these kind of attacks by their superiors/supervisors. In addition, mobbing is also a growing problem in educational organizations, especially in universities. In this sense the academicians who are exposed to emotional attacks, cannot proceed in their scholarly activities; because of the fact that mobbing creates a number of physical and psychological problems on them. Furthermore, mobbing behavior not only affects their academic success but also their private life; in the sense that they are affected psychologically and they lose their psychological and mental health, as mentioned. In this frame, the purpose of this study is to reveal the perceptions and attitudes of academic staff in universities towards mobbing. In the scope of the research, academicians that work in foundation universities in the city of Istanbul, Türkiye are defined as the sample. A total of 166 academicians have participated in the research. The gathered data is analyzed via SPSS 22.0 package programme. According to the results, there is statistically significant difference between the socio-demographic (gender, age, marital status, monthly income, academic department, academic experience) characteristics of academicians and their attitudes towards mobbing.","PeriodicalId":422780,"journal":{"name":"OPUS Journal of Society Research","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OPUS Journal of Society Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26466/opusjsr.1191308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mobbing is defined as psychological attack to the individuals. In this sense, mobbing behaviour is especially applied to employees in both public and private organizations and generally inferiors are exposed to these kind of attacks by their superiors/supervisors. In addition, mobbing is also a growing problem in educational organizations, especially in universities. In this sense the academicians who are exposed to emotional attacks, cannot proceed in their scholarly activities; because of the fact that mobbing creates a number of physical and psychological problems on them. Furthermore, mobbing behavior not only affects their academic success but also their private life; in the sense that they are affected psychologically and they lose their psychological and mental health, as mentioned. In this frame, the purpose of this study is to reveal the perceptions and attitudes of academic staff in universities towards mobbing. In the scope of the research, academicians that work in foundation universities in the city of Istanbul, Türkiye are defined as the sample. A total of 166 academicians have participated in the research. The gathered data is analyzed via SPSS 22.0 package programme. According to the results, there is statistically significant difference between the socio-demographic (gender, age, marital status, monthly income, academic department, academic experience) characteristics of academicians and their attitudes towards mobbing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对学术人员的看法
围攻被定义为对个体的心理攻击。从这个意义上说,暴徒行为尤其适用于公共和私人组织的员工,通常下级会受到上级/主管的这种攻击。此外,在教育机构中,尤其是在大学里,聚众也是一个日益严重的问题。从这个意义上说,遭受情感攻击的学者无法继续他们的学术活动;因为这一事实给他们带来了许多身体和心理上的问题。此外,聚众行为不仅影响他们的学业成功,也影响他们的私人生活;从某种意义上说,他们在心理上受到影响,失去了心理和精神健康,如前所述。在此框架下,本研究的目的是揭示大学学术人员对暴徒的看法和态度。在研究范围内,在伊斯坦布尔基耶市基础大学工作的学者被定义为样本。共有166名院士参与了这项研究。收集的数据通过SPSS 22.0软件包程序进行分析。结果显示,院士的社会人口学特征(性别、年龄、婚姻状况、月收入、院系、学术经历)与对围捕行为的态度存在统计学差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Generation Z Teachers’ Reflective Thinking Skills Investigation of Risks and Risk Management Practices in The Fast-Moving Consumer Goods Sector in Turkey with an Interview Study Suçlular ve Suçsuzlar Arasında Yürütücü İşlevlerin Karşılaştırılması: Bir Meta-Analiz "Örgütsel Farklılıklar" Kavramının Görsel Haritalama Tekniği Kullanılarak Bibliyometrik Analizi Direnişin Ritimleri: İran Ses Manzarasında Farsça Rap'in Kültürel Dinamikleri ve Duygusal Yankısı
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1