"Örgütsel Farklılıklar" Kavramının Görsel Haritalama Tekniği Kullanılarak Bibliyometrik Analizi

Meri TAKSİ DEVECİYAN
{"title":"\"Örgütsel Farklılıklar\" Kavramının Görsel Haritalama Tekniği Kullanılarak Bibliyometrik Analizi","authors":"Meri TAKSİ DEVECİYAN","doi":"10.26466/opusjsr.1402993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, it is aimed to perform a bibliometric analysis of the research related to the concept of organizational differences and to make inferences about the general structure of the field. In this direction, in the research, 303 scientific publications on \"organizational differences\" were examined with the bibliometric analysis method using the Web of Science database, and then the obtained data were visualized using the VOSviewer software program. Bibliometric methods such as keyword analysis, citation analysis, co-author analysis, co-citation analysis of authors were used on the identified scientific publications. Using bibliometric methods, a comprehensive view of the dynamics of the field is presented; the development of the literature on the concept of \"organizational differences\" has been mapped by determining the basic studies, types, years, authors, countries and publication areas. As a result of the study, it was found that the subject of \"organizational differences\" was not studied sufficiently in the literature; the most publications on a country basis were from America, the most publications on a year basis were published in 2019, and the most commonly cited author was Alstemark B. It is thought that the findings obtained as a result of the analysis will provide resources for future studies on \"organizational differences\".","PeriodicalId":422780,"journal":{"name":"OPUS Journal of Society Research","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OPUS Journal of Society Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26466/opusjsr.1402993","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, it is aimed to perform a bibliometric analysis of the research related to the concept of organizational differences and to make inferences about the general structure of the field. In this direction, in the research, 303 scientific publications on "organizational differences" were examined with the bibliometric analysis method using the Web of Science database, and then the obtained data were visualized using the VOSviewer software program. Bibliometric methods such as keyword analysis, citation analysis, co-author analysis, co-citation analysis of authors were used on the identified scientific publications. Using bibliometric methods, a comprehensive view of the dynamics of the field is presented; the development of the literature on the concept of "organizational differences" has been mapped by determining the basic studies, types, years, authors, countries and publication areas. As a result of the study, it was found that the subject of "organizational differences" was not studied sufficiently in the literature; the most publications on a country basis were from America, the most publications on a year basis were published in 2019, and the most commonly cited author was Alstemark B. It is thought that the findings obtained as a result of the analysis will provide resources for future studies on "organizational differences".
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用视觉绘图技术对 "组织差异 "概念进行文献计量分析
本研究旨在对与 "组织差异 "概念相关的研究进行文献计量分析,并推断该领域的总体结构。为此,本研究使用 Web of Science 数据库,采用文献计量分析方法对 303 篇有关 "组织差异 "的科学出版物进行了研究,然后使用 VOSviewer 软件程序对所获得的数据进行了可视化处理。文献计量学方法包括关键词分析、引文分析、合著者分析、作者合引分析等。通过使用文献计量学方法,全面了解了该领域的动态;通过确定基本研究、类型、年份、作者、国家和出版领域,绘制了关于 "组织差异 "概念的文献发展图。研究结果发现,文献对 "组织差异 "这一主题的研究并不充分;按国家划分,最多的出版物来自美国,按年份划分,最多的出版物发表于 2019 年,最常被引用的作者是 Alstemark B。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Generation Z Teachers’ Reflective Thinking Skills Investigation of Risks and Risk Management Practices in The Fast-Moving Consumer Goods Sector in Turkey with an Interview Study Suçlular ve Suçsuzlar Arasında Yürütücü İşlevlerin Karşılaştırılması: Bir Meta-Analiz "Örgütsel Farklılıklar" Kavramının Görsel Haritalama Tekniği Kullanılarak Bibliyometrik Analizi Direnişin Ritimleri: İran Ses Manzarasında Farsça Rap'in Kültürel Dinamikleri ve Duygusal Yankısı
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1