Economic Participation Rights and the All-Affected Principle

A. Zimmermann
{"title":"Economic Participation Rights and the All-Affected Principle","authors":"A. Zimmermann","doi":"10.21248/GJN.10.2.144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The democratic boundary problem raises the question of who has democratic participation rights in a given polity and why. One possible solution to this problem is the all-affected principle (AAP), according to which a polity ought to enfranchise all persons whose interests are affected by the polity’s decisions in a morally significant way. While AAP offers a plausible principle of democratic enfranchisement, its supporters have so far not paid sufficient attention to economic participation rights. I argue that if one commits oneself to AAP, one must also commit oneself to the view that political participation rights are not necessarily the only, and not necessarily the best, way to protect morally weighty interests. I also argue that economic participation rights raise important worries about democratic accountability, which is why their exercise must be constrained by a number of moral duties.","PeriodicalId":117351,"journal":{"name":"Global Justice : Theory Practice Rhetoric","volume":"142 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Justice : Theory Practice Rhetoric","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21248/GJN.10.2.144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The democratic boundary problem raises the question of who has democratic participation rights in a given polity and why. One possible solution to this problem is the all-affected principle (AAP), according to which a polity ought to enfranchise all persons whose interests are affected by the polity’s decisions in a morally significant way. While AAP offers a plausible principle of democratic enfranchisement, its supporters have so far not paid sufficient attention to economic participation rights. I argue that if one commits oneself to AAP, one must also commit oneself to the view that political participation rights are not necessarily the only, and not necessarily the best, way to protect morally weighty interests. I also argue that economic participation rights raise important worries about democratic accountability, which is why their exercise must be constrained by a number of moral duties.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经济参与权与受影响原则
民主边界问题提出了这样一个问题:在一个给定的政体中,谁有民主参与权?为什么?这个问题的一个可能的解决方案是全受影响原则(AAP),根据该原则,一个政体应该以一种具有道德意义的方式赋予所有利益受到政体决策影响的人以选举权。尽管平民党提出了一种看似合理的民主选举权原则,但其支持者迄今尚未对经济参与权给予足够重视。我认为,如果一个人致力于AAP,他也必须致力于这样一种观点,即政治参与权不一定是保护道德上重要利益的唯一方式,也不一定是最好的方式。我还认为,经济参与权引发了对民主问责制的重大担忧,这就是为什么它们的行使必须受到一系列道德义务的约束。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Solidarity and/in Language Solidarism and the Struggle Against Environmental Racism Business and Bleeding Hearts Creating Racial Structural Solidarity Normative Demand for Deference in Political Solidarity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1