Training Non-Directiveness? A Transdisciplinary Survey of Medical Students' Perspective Towards Prenatal Counseling and Down Syndrome

Thomas Dilen, T. Lefèvre, Bram Mariën, Benjamin Munster, F. Neven, Gaëtan Van Deursen, Jill Van In, Marie Verberckmoes, Nynke van Uffelen, E. Zenner
{"title":"Training Non-Directiveness? A Transdisciplinary Survey of Medical Students' Perspective Towards Prenatal Counseling and Down Syndrome","authors":"Thomas Dilen, T. Lefèvre, Bram Mariën, Benjamin Munster, F. Neven, Gaëtan Van Deursen, Jill Van In, Marie Verberckmoes, Nynke van Uffelen, E. Zenner","doi":"10.11116/TDI2020.4.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT) is a highly sensitive blood analysis tool that allows for the early detection of multiple chromosomal abnormalities, including Down syndrome. Prenatal testing in general and a positive test outcome in particular leave pregnant parents facing difficult\n ethical decisions and life-changing dilemmas. The language used by medical practitioners in this context has the potential to exert a strong influence on parents in their decision-making process. During counseling, health care professionals (HCPs) are expected to encourage parents to make\n an informed yet autonomous decision, which hinges on maximally unbiased, clear and consistent communication from the HCP. It is still unclear whether medical students are aware of this importance of unbiased communication, how they perceive the role of HCPs in the prenatal counseling process,\n and what perspectives they have regarding the disabilities screened for. Our research project aims to address this gap, presenting the results of a transdisciplinary survey completed by 245 medical students at KU Leuven. In particular, the survey investigates: (1) the students' view on the\n ideal prenatal counseling process; (2) their knowledge of NIPT and Down syndrome (the most prevalent disability NIPT screens for); and (3) their general attitudes towards disabilities. Results reveal that more than 50% of medical students do not feel prepared for genetic counseling. The survey\n further shows a lack of knowledge and some clearly negative attitudes towards life with disability; 20% of medical students agree that a life with Down syndrome should be avoided. Overall, results indicate fairly heterogeneous distribution of knowledge and fairly diverse attitudes of the students,\n suggesting revisions in the current curriculum might be needed to increase the homogeneity towards counseling and disabilities in the medical student population.","PeriodicalId":316049,"journal":{"name":"Transdisciplinary Insights","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transdisciplinary Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11116/TDI2020.4.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT) is a highly sensitive blood analysis tool that allows for the early detection of multiple chromosomal abnormalities, including Down syndrome. Prenatal testing in general and a positive test outcome in particular leave pregnant parents facing difficult ethical decisions and life-changing dilemmas. The language used by medical practitioners in this context has the potential to exert a strong influence on parents in their decision-making process. During counseling, health care professionals (HCPs) are expected to encourage parents to make an informed yet autonomous decision, which hinges on maximally unbiased, clear and consistent communication from the HCP. It is still unclear whether medical students are aware of this importance of unbiased communication, how they perceive the role of HCPs in the prenatal counseling process, and what perspectives they have regarding the disabilities screened for. Our research project aims to address this gap, presenting the results of a transdisciplinary survey completed by 245 medical students at KU Leuven. In particular, the survey investigates: (1) the students' view on the ideal prenatal counseling process; (2) their knowledge of NIPT and Down syndrome (the most prevalent disability NIPT screens for); and (3) their general attitudes towards disabilities. Results reveal that more than 50% of medical students do not feel prepared for genetic counseling. The survey further shows a lack of knowledge and some clearly negative attitudes towards life with disability; 20% of medical students agree that a life with Down syndrome should be avoided. Overall, results indicate fairly heterogeneous distribution of knowledge and fairly diverse attitudes of the students, suggesting revisions in the current curriculum might be needed to increase the homogeneity towards counseling and disabilities in the medical student population.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Non-Directiveness培训?医学生产前咨询与唐氏综合症观点的跨学科调查
非侵入性产前检查(NIPT)是一种高度敏感的血液分析工具,可以早期发现多种染色体异常,包括唐氏综合症。一般的产前检查,特别是阳性的检查结果,使怀孕的父母面临艰难的道德决定和改变生活的困境。在这种情况下,医生使用的语言有可能对父母的决策过程产生强烈影响。在咨询期间,卫生保健专业人员(HCP)应鼓励家长做出知情但自主的决定,这取决于最大限度地公正,清晰和一致的沟通从HCP。目前尚不清楚医学生是否意识到公正沟通的重要性,他们如何看待卫生保健人员在产前咨询过程中的作用,以及他们对筛查的残疾有什么看法。我们的研究项目旨在解决这一差距,提出了由鲁汶大学245名医科学生完成的跨学科调查的结果。具体而言,调查调查:(1)学生对理想产前咨询流程的看法;(2)他们对NIPT和唐氏综合症(NIPT筛查中最常见的残疾)的了解;(3)他们对残疾的总体态度。结果显示,超过50%的医学生对遗传咨询没有做好准备。调查进一步显示,他们缺乏知识,对残疾生活持一些明显的消极态度;20%的医科学生认为应该避免患有唐氏综合症。总体而言,结果表明知识分布相当不均,学生的态度也相当多样化,这表明可能需要修改现行课程,以增加医学生群体对咨询和残疾的同质性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Learning for the Future: A Case Study of Transdisciplinary Collaboration to Improve Pandemic Preparedness Community Resilience to Muddy Flood Disasters in the Dijle Catchment Region, Belgium: Study Cases of Bertem and Beauvechain Municipalities (Re-)Imagining Neighbourhood Spaces from a Transdisciplinary, Inclusive Research Perspective: The Vaartkom Case Conceptualising Open Science in the 21st Century STE(A)M+: Transforming Higher Education through Collaborative Play
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1