Investigation of relationship between coronary angiography results and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratios of patients with acute coronary syndrome in the emergency department

{"title":"Investigation of relationship between coronary angiography results and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratios of patients with acute coronary syndrome in the emergency department","authors":"","doi":"10.51271/kmj-0030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: We aimed to identify patients diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in the emergency department and for whom medical treatment was decided during coronary angiography, according to their neutrophil/lymphocyte ratios at the time of admission.\n\nMaterial and Method: Patients diagnosed with ACS in the emergency department and undergoing coronary angiography (CAG) were included. The patients were divided into two groups as non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. According to their CAG results, the patients in both groups were classified as those who underwent coronary intervention and those who did not. In addition, demographic data such as age and gender, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, monocytes, aspartate aminotransferase, and C-reactive protein values of these patients were recorded in the data form. These values were statistically compared between those who decided on a coronary intervention during CAG and those who did not.\n\nResults: A total of 647 patients were included in the study. The patients were divided into 325 patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome and 322 with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. The age range of the patients in both groups was 30 to 93. Monocyte, aspartate aminotransferase, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, and gender were significant in the diagnosis process. The diagnosis was the only effective factor in detecting patients for whom a coronary intervention was decided during CAG. Gender, age, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, aspartate aminotransferase, C-reactive protein, and monocyte values were insignificant.\n\nConclusion: Even if some parameters such as monocyte count, N/L ratio, and aspartate aminotransferase in patients diagnosed with ACS in the emergency department are ineffective in predicting the medical treatment decision during CAG, they may help in the clinical decision-making process.","PeriodicalId":369732,"journal":{"name":"Kastamonu Medical Journal","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kastamonu Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51271/kmj-0030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to identify patients diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in the emergency department and for whom medical treatment was decided during coronary angiography, according to their neutrophil/lymphocyte ratios at the time of admission. Material and Method: Patients diagnosed with ACS in the emergency department and undergoing coronary angiography (CAG) were included. The patients were divided into two groups as non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. According to their CAG results, the patients in both groups were classified as those who underwent coronary intervention and those who did not. In addition, demographic data such as age and gender, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, monocytes, aspartate aminotransferase, and C-reactive protein values of these patients were recorded in the data form. These values were statistically compared between those who decided on a coronary intervention during CAG and those who did not. Results: A total of 647 patients were included in the study. The patients were divided into 325 patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome and 322 with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. The age range of the patients in both groups was 30 to 93. Monocyte, aspartate aminotransferase, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, and gender were significant in the diagnosis process. The diagnosis was the only effective factor in detecting patients for whom a coronary intervention was decided during CAG. Gender, age, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, aspartate aminotransferase, C-reactive protein, and monocyte values were insignificant. Conclusion: Even if some parameters such as monocyte count, N/L ratio, and aspartate aminotransferase in patients diagnosed with ACS in the emergency department are ineffective in predicting the medical treatment decision during CAG, they may help in the clinical decision-making process.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊科急性冠脉综合征患者冠状动脉造影结果与中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值关系的研究
目的:我们的目的是确定急诊诊断为急性冠脉综合征(ACS)的患者,并根据入院时的中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比率在冠状动脉造影期间决定对其进行药物治疗。材料与方法:纳入急诊科诊断为ACS并行冠状动脉造影(CAG)的患者。将患者分为非st段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征和st段抬高型心肌梗死两组。根据他们的CAG结果,两组患者分为接受冠状动脉介入治疗的患者和未接受冠状动脉介入治疗的患者。此外,在数据表中记录患者的年龄、性别、中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值、单核细胞、天冬氨酸转氨酶、c反应蛋白值等人口统计学数据。这些数值在CAG期间决定进行冠状动脉介入治疗的患者和未决定进行冠状动脉介入治疗的患者之间进行统计学比较。结果:共纳入647例患者。患者分为非st段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征325例和st段抬高型心肌梗死322例。两组患者年龄均为30 ~ 93岁。单核细胞、天冬氨酸转氨酶、中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值和性别在诊断过程中具有重要意义。在冠状动脉造影期间,诊断是发现决定进行冠状动脉介入治疗的患者的唯一有效因素。性别、年龄、中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值、天冬氨酸转氨酶、c反应蛋白和单核细胞值均不显著。结论:即使急诊诊断为ACS患者的单核细胞计数、N/L比值、天冬氨酸转氨酶等参数在CAG中不能有效预测治疗决策,但它们可能有助于临床决策过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Health follow-up visits of children with autism How much did the February 6 earthquakes affect a distant hospital? The effect of general anesthesia applied during cesarean section on newborn bilirubin Ultrasound-guided neuromonitoring methods in the intensive care unit Pulmonary candidiasis presenting as tumor-like shadow
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1