On Epistemic Warrant in Text

V. Demyankov
{"title":"On Epistemic Warrant in Text","authors":"V. Demyankov","doi":"10.19181/smtp.2022.4.3.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Linguistic techniques used for formulating and for proving propositions in arts and in sciences do not solely depend on grammatical and lexical structures of national languages, they also belong to certain cultural traditions. Interpersonal relationships also influence the form and the content of scientific texts, they are governed by ethical principles of scholarly communication. The notion of ‘epistemic warrant of judgments’ used metaphorically gives a culture-dependent way for looking at the real-time processes of conjectures and refutations, where ‘epistemic default’ is not excluded. The logical ‘possibility’ and ‘probability’ themselves may be considered as culture-dependent, so that the possible-world pragmatics acquires a civilisational aspect. Empirical facts concerning relative frequencies of the use of certain lexical items are discussed in this paper. Thus, possibility is much more frequently mentioned in both scientific and in fictional text corpora in Latin, in French, in Spanish, in Italian, in English, in German, and in Russian. The concept of ‘improbability’ is much less frequent than ‘probability’.","PeriodicalId":433804,"journal":{"name":"Science Management: Theory and Practice","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Management: Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2022.4.3.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Linguistic techniques used for formulating and for proving propositions in arts and in sciences do not solely depend on grammatical and lexical structures of national languages, they also belong to certain cultural traditions. Interpersonal relationships also influence the form and the content of scientific texts, they are governed by ethical principles of scholarly communication. The notion of ‘epistemic warrant of judgments’ used metaphorically gives a culture-dependent way for looking at the real-time processes of conjectures and refutations, where ‘epistemic default’ is not excluded. The logical ‘possibility’ and ‘probability’ themselves may be considered as culture-dependent, so that the possible-world pragmatics acquires a civilisational aspect. Empirical facts concerning relative frequencies of the use of certain lexical items are discussed in this paper. Thus, possibility is much more frequently mentioned in both scientific and in fictional text corpora in Latin, in French, in Spanish, in Italian, in English, in German, and in Russian. The concept of ‘improbability’ is much less frequent than ‘probability’.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
论文本的认识论保证
在艺术和科学中用于表述和证明命题的语言技巧不仅取决于民族语言的语法和词汇结构,它们也属于某些文化传统。人际关系也影响着科学文本的形式和内容,它们受到学术交流的伦理原则的支配。“判断的认识论保证”的概念隐喻地提供了一种文化依赖的方式来看待猜测和反驳的实时过程,其中不排除“认识论默认”。逻辑的“可能性”和“概率”本身可以被认为是文化依赖的,因此可能世界语用学获得了文明的方面。本文讨论了有关某些词汇使用相对频率的经验事实。因此,可能性在拉丁语、法语、西班牙语、意大利语、英语、德语和俄语的科学和虚构文本语料库中都被更频繁地提到。“非概率”的概念比“概率”的概念要少得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On the Separation of Scientific Activity and the State-owned Corporate Form of Science Management in Contemporary Russia. Part 1 Jurisprudence for the Development of Science: Ideas that Should Not Be Forgotten (To the 100th Anniversary of the Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the RF) The State Policy of the USSR in Relation to the Academy of Sciences of the USSR in the Second Half of the 20th Century. The Organizational and Legal Aspect Introduction of Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Russian Economy: A Practitioner’s View Digitalization of Public Administration and Economy: Terminological Clarity as a Factor of Success of Digital Development. Review of the Textbook “Digital State and Economy” Edited by S. E. Prokofiev, O. V. Panina and K. V. Kharchenko
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1