Online administration of a reasoning inventory in development

Alexis Olsho, S. Brahmia, Trevor I. Smith, Charlotte Zimmerman, A. Boudreaux, Philip Eaton
{"title":"Online administration of a reasoning inventory in development","authors":"Alexis Olsho, S. Brahmia, Trevor I. Smith, Charlotte Zimmerman, A. Boudreaux, Philip Eaton","doi":"10.1119/perc.2020.pr.Olsho","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We are developing a new research based assessment (RBA) focused on quantitative reasoning -- rather than conceptual understanding -- in physics contexts. We rapidly moved administration of the RBA online in Spring 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. We present our experiences with online, unproctored administration of an RBA in development to students enrolled in a large-enrollment, calculus-based, introductory physics course. We describe our attempts to adhere to best practices on a limited time frame, and present a preliminary analysis of the results, comparing results from the online administration to earlier results from in-person, proctored administration. We include discussion of online administration of multiple-choice/multiple-response (MCMR) items, which we use on the instrument as a way to probe multiple facets of student reasoning. Our initial comparison indicates little difference between online and paper administrations of the RBA, consistent with previous work by other researchers.","PeriodicalId":269466,"journal":{"name":"2020 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2020.pr.Olsho","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

We are developing a new research based assessment (RBA) focused on quantitative reasoning -- rather than conceptual understanding -- in physics contexts. We rapidly moved administration of the RBA online in Spring 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. We present our experiences with online, unproctored administration of an RBA in development to students enrolled in a large-enrollment, calculus-based, introductory physics course. We describe our attempts to adhere to best practices on a limited time frame, and present a preliminary analysis of the results, comparing results from the online administration to earlier results from in-person, proctored administration. We include discussion of online administration of multiple-choice/multiple-response (MCMR) items, which we use on the instrument as a way to probe multiple facets of student reasoning. Our initial comparison indicates little difference between online and paper administrations of the RBA, consistent with previous work by other researchers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发中的推理库存的在线管理
我们正在开发一种新的基于研究的评估(RBA),专注于物理背景下的定量推理,而不是概念理解。由于2019冠状病毒病大流行,我们于2020年春季迅速将澳大利亚央行的管理转移到网上。我们向报名参加大规模、以微积分为基础的物理入门课程的学生介绍我们在开发中的RBA在线、无监考管理方面的经验。我们描述了我们在有限的时间框架内坚持最佳实践的尝试,并对结果进行了初步分析,将在线管理的结果与早期现场监督管理的结果进行了比较。我们还讨论了多项选择/多项回答(MCMR)项目的在线管理,我们在仪器上使用这些项目来探索学生推理的多个方面。我们的初步比较表明,在线和纸质管理之间的差异不大,与其他研究人员之前的工作一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Graduate programs in physics education research: A USA based survey Qualitative Analysis of Students' Epistemic Framing Surrounding Instructor's Interaction Centering and marginalization in introductory university physics courses Toward a framework for the natures of proportional reasoning in introductory physics What does the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation pretest measure?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1