Intersectional and social epidemiology approaches to understanding the Influence of race, ethnicity, and caste on global public health

Jennifer L. Beard, Nafisa Halim, S. Abdalla, S. Galea
{"title":"Intersectional and social epidemiology approaches to understanding the Influence of race, ethnicity, and caste on global public health","authors":"Jennifer L. Beard, Nafisa Halim, S. Abdalla, S. Galea","doi":"10.1093/med/9780198816805.003.0088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ethnicity, race, caste, sex, and gender are characteristics that can determine social status, health, and illness for both individuals and communities. They are among the many attributes that social epidemiologists account for when conducting research to understand the forces driving health disparities. Intersectional theory posits that each individual comprises multiple, interlocking identities that are projected on to them by the society in which they live. These identities confer multilayered privilege or disadvantage based on context-specific power dynamics, social norms, and biases. Intersectionality is a perspective that grew out of the social justice movements that have shaken entrenched systems of power and social norms over the last 60 years. Intersectional theory challenges traditional epidemiological methods of measuring associations between demographic variables and health outcomes. It also offers social epidemiology an opportunity to explore new methodologies that illuminate factors contributing to health disparities and promote social justice as core research objectives. This chapter illustrates intersections between social determinants and health outcomes in a descriptive case study focused on India and explores innovative methods for incorporating intersectionality into epidemiological research methods and analysis.","PeriodicalId":206715,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Textbook of Global Public Health","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford Textbook of Global Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780198816805.003.0088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ethnicity, race, caste, sex, and gender are characteristics that can determine social status, health, and illness for both individuals and communities. They are among the many attributes that social epidemiologists account for when conducting research to understand the forces driving health disparities. Intersectional theory posits that each individual comprises multiple, interlocking identities that are projected on to them by the society in which they live. These identities confer multilayered privilege or disadvantage based on context-specific power dynamics, social norms, and biases. Intersectionality is a perspective that grew out of the social justice movements that have shaken entrenched systems of power and social norms over the last 60 years. Intersectional theory challenges traditional epidemiological methods of measuring associations between demographic variables and health outcomes. It also offers social epidemiology an opportunity to explore new methodologies that illuminate factors contributing to health disparities and promote social justice as core research objectives. This chapter illustrates intersections between social determinants and health outcomes in a descriptive case study focused on India and explores innovative methods for incorporating intersectionality into epidemiological research methods and analysis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解种族、民族和种姓对全球公共卫生影响的交叉和社会流行病学方法
民族、种族、种姓、性别和性别是可以决定个人和社区的社会地位、健康和疾病的特征。社会流行病学家在进行研究以了解导致健康差异的力量时,会考虑到这些因素。交叉理论认为,每个人都由他们所生活的社会投射到他们身上的多个相互关联的身份组成。这些身份赋予了基于上下文特定的权力动态、社会规范和偏见的多层特权或劣势。交叉性是一个从社会正义运动中产生的观点,在过去的60年里,社会正义运动动摇了根深蒂固的权力体系和社会规范。交叉理论挑战了衡量人口变量与健康结果之间关系的传统流行病学方法。它还为社会流行病学提供了一个探索新方法的机会,这些方法阐明了造成健康差异的因素,并将促进社会正义作为核心研究目标。本章在一个以印度为重点的描述性案例研究中阐明了社会决定因素与健康结果之间的交叉点,并探讨了将交叉点纳入流行病学研究方法和分析的创新方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Health policy in developing countries Prisoners Tobacco Behavioural determinants of health and disease Medical screening
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1