Trunk resistance to mechanical perturbations, associations with low back pain, pain-related cognitions and movement precision

IF 1.6 3区 心理学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Human Movement Science Pub Date : 2023-11-17 DOI:10.1016/j.humov.2023.103159
Meta H. Wildenbeest , Henri Kiers , Matthijs Tuijt , Maarten R. Prins , Jaap H. van Dieën
{"title":"Trunk resistance to mechanical perturbations, associations with low back pain, pain-related cognitions and movement precision","authors":"Meta H. Wildenbeest ,&nbsp;Henri Kiers ,&nbsp;Matthijs Tuijt ,&nbsp;Maarten R. Prins ,&nbsp;Jaap H. van Dieën","doi":"10.1016/j.humov.2023.103159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Pain-related cognitions are associated with motor control changes in people with chronic low-back pain (CLBP). The mechanism underlying this association is unclear. We propose that perceived threat increases muscle-spindle-reflex-gains, which reduces the effect of mechanical perturbations, and simultaneously decreases movement precision. <em>Aim:</em> To evaluate effects of CLBP and pain-related cognitions on the impact of mechanical perturbations on trunk movement, and associations between these perturbation effects and movement precision.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>30 participants with CLBP and 30 healthy controls, performed two consecutive trials of a seated repetitive reaching task. During both trials participants were warned for mechanical perturbations, which were only administered during the second trial. The perturbation effect was characterized by the deviation of the trajectory of the T8 vertebra relative to the </span>sacrum. Trunk movement precision was expressed as tracking error during a trunk movement target tracking task. We assessed pain-related cognitions with the task-specific ‘Expected Back Strain’-scale (EBS). We used a two-way-Anova to assess the effect of Group (CLBP vs back-healthy) and dichotomized EBS (higher vs lower) on the perturbation effect, and a Pearson's correlation to assess associations between perturbation effects and movement precision.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Higher EBS was associated with smaller perturbation effects (<em>p</em> ≤ 0.011). A negative correlation was found between the perturbation effect and the tracking error, in the higher EBS-group (<em>r</em> = −0.5, <em>p</em> = 0.013).</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>These results demonstrate that pain-related cognitions influence trunk movement control and support the idea that more negative pain-related cognitions lead to an increased resistance against perturbations, at the expense of movement precision.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55046,"journal":{"name":"Human Movement Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Movement Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167945723001057","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Pain-related cognitions are associated with motor control changes in people with chronic low-back pain (CLBP). The mechanism underlying this association is unclear. We propose that perceived threat increases muscle-spindle-reflex-gains, which reduces the effect of mechanical perturbations, and simultaneously decreases movement precision. Aim: To evaluate effects of CLBP and pain-related cognitions on the impact of mechanical perturbations on trunk movement, and associations between these perturbation effects and movement precision.

Methods

30 participants with CLBP and 30 healthy controls, performed two consecutive trials of a seated repetitive reaching task. During both trials participants were warned for mechanical perturbations, which were only administered during the second trial. The perturbation effect was characterized by the deviation of the trajectory of the T8 vertebra relative to the sacrum. Trunk movement precision was expressed as tracking error during a trunk movement target tracking task. We assessed pain-related cognitions with the task-specific ‘Expected Back Strain’-scale (EBS). We used a two-way-Anova to assess the effect of Group (CLBP vs back-healthy) and dichotomized EBS (higher vs lower) on the perturbation effect, and a Pearson's correlation to assess associations between perturbation effects and movement precision.

Findings

Higher EBS was associated with smaller perturbation effects (p ≤ 0.011). A negative correlation was found between the perturbation effect and the tracking error, in the higher EBS-group (r = −0.5, p = 0.013).

Interpretation

These results demonstrate that pain-related cognitions influence trunk movement control and support the idea that more negative pain-related cognitions lead to an increased resistance against perturbations, at the expense of movement precision.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
躯干对机械扰动的抵抗,与腰痛、疼痛相关认知和运动精度的关系
背景:慢性腰痛(CLBP)患者的疼痛相关认知与运动控制变化相关。这种关联背后的机制尚不清楚。我们认为感知到的威胁增加了肌肉纺锤体反射增益,这减少了机械扰动的影响,同时降低了运动精度。目的:评价CLBP和疼痛相关认知对机械扰动对躯干运动的影响,以及这些扰动效应与运动精度的关系。方法30名CLBP患者和30名健康对照者进行了连续两次的坐姿重复性伸手任务试验。在两次试验中,参与者都被警告有机械扰动,这只在第二次试验中进行。扰动效应的特征是T8椎体相对于骶骨的轨迹偏离。树干运动精度表示为树干运动目标跟踪任务中的跟踪误差。我们用特定任务的“预期背部劳损”量表(EBS)评估疼痛相关认知。我们使用双向方差分析来评估组(CLBP vs背部健康)和二分类EBS(高vs低)对扰动效应的影响,并使用Pearson相关来评估扰动效应与运动精度之间的关联。结果:较高的EBS与较小的扰动效应相关(p≤0.011)。在较高的ebs组中,扰动效应与跟踪误差呈负相关(r = - 0.5, p = 0.013)。这些结果表明,与疼痛相关的认知影响躯干运动控制,并支持这样一种观点,即更多的负面疼痛相关认知导致对扰动的抵抗力增加,以牺牲运动精度为代价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Human Movement Science
Human Movement Science 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
89
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Human Movement Science provides a medium for publishing disciplinary and multidisciplinary studies on human movement. It brings together psychological, biomechanical and neurophysiological research on the control, organization and learning of human movement, including the perceptual support of movement. The overarching goal of the journal is to publish articles that help advance theoretical understanding of the control and organization of human movement, as well as changes therein as a function of development, learning and rehabilitation. The nature of the research reported may vary from fundamental theoretical or empirical studies to more applied studies in the fields of, for example, sport, dance and rehabilitation with the proviso that all studies have a distinct theoretical bearing. Also, reviews and meta-studies advancing the understanding of human movement are welcome. These aims and scope imply that purely descriptive studies are not acceptable, while methodological articles are only acceptable if the methodology in question opens up new vistas in understanding the control and organization of human movement. The same holds for articles on exercise physiology, which in general are not supported, unless they speak to the control and organization of human movement. In general, it is required that the theoretical message of articles published in Human Movement Science is, to a certain extent, innovative and not dismissible as just "more of the same."
期刊最新文献
Effects of freezing of gait on vertical ground reaction force in Parkinson's disease Synergy in motion: Exploring the similarity and variability of muscle synergy patterns in healthy individuals Concentric exercise-induced fatigue of the shoulder impairs proprioception but not motor control or performance in healthy young adults Influence of exercise-induced hamstrings fatigue on proprioceptive reweighting strategies and postural performance in bipedal stance in recreational athletes Domain-specific balance training reduces slip-related fall risk in young adults: A potential alternative to perturbation training
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1