Prevalence of Pseudomonas Species, Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus in Milk Samples of Apparently Normal Lactating Cows at Various Cattle Farms in Ibadan, Nigeria

Elizabeth Amosun, R Adedokun, O Banwo, Simon Akhaine, O Amoo, O Jeremiah
{"title":"Prevalence of Pseudomonas Species, Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus in Milk Samples of Apparently Normal Lactating Cows at Various Cattle Farms in Ibadan, Nigeria","authors":"Elizabeth Amosun, R Adedokun, O Banwo, Simon Akhaine, O Amoo, O Jeremiah","doi":"10.5455/ajvs.12040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was aimed at identifying the most significant bacteria isolates in the udder quarters as pathogenic causes of subclinical mastitis, and as well to investigate antibiotic sensitivity of the isolated organisms. The study was carried out at three cattle farm locations in Ibadan metropolis, Oyo State, Nigeria. A total number of 105 apparently healthy lactating cows without udder inflammation were sampled for milk; sampling by hand stripping was done after swabbing the teats with cotton wool dipped in alcohol and discarding the first stripping. Culture and isolation techniques, as well as biochemical tests of milk samples from the four quarters of udders of the 105 apparently healthy cows were carried out. In addition, an in vitro antibacterial sensitivity test was performed for six classes of antibacterial agents. A test of independent assessment (Chi-square test) was used to determine if association existed between the bacterial species collectively isolated and the affected animals (p = 0.716) or quarters (p = <0.000). The study established the presence of subclinical mastitis associated with known pathogens of which Pseudomonas species (67.9%), Staphylococcus aureus (53.6%) and Escherichia coli (14.3%) were most significant in decreasing order of quarter distribution in average percentages. The study further revealed differences in susceptibility of the various quarters and spread of infection. The isolated pathogens were generally most susceptible to the fluoroquinolones while varying degrees of resistance was a finding for other classes of antibacterial used possibly due to their prolonged and indiscriminate use; and this calls for caution by animal health care providers.","PeriodicalId":7928,"journal":{"name":"alexandria journal of veterinary sciences","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"alexandria journal of veterinary sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/ajvs.12040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was aimed at identifying the most significant bacteria isolates in the udder quarters as pathogenic causes of subclinical mastitis, and as well to investigate antibiotic sensitivity of the isolated organisms. The study was carried out at three cattle farm locations in Ibadan metropolis, Oyo State, Nigeria. A total number of 105 apparently healthy lactating cows without udder inflammation were sampled for milk; sampling by hand stripping was done after swabbing the teats with cotton wool dipped in alcohol and discarding the first stripping. Culture and isolation techniques, as well as biochemical tests of milk samples from the four quarters of udders of the 105 apparently healthy cows were carried out. In addition, an in vitro antibacterial sensitivity test was performed for six classes of antibacterial agents. A test of independent assessment (Chi-square test) was used to determine if association existed between the bacterial species collectively isolated and the affected animals (p = 0.716) or quarters (p = <0.000). The study established the presence of subclinical mastitis associated with known pathogens of which Pseudomonas species (67.9%), Staphylococcus aureus (53.6%) and Escherichia coli (14.3%) were most significant in decreasing order of quarter distribution in average percentages. The study further revealed differences in susceptibility of the various quarters and spread of infection. The isolated pathogens were generally most susceptible to the fluoroquinolones while varying degrees of resistance was a finding for other classes of antibacterial used possibly due to their prolonged and indiscriminate use; and this calls for caution by animal health care providers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
假单胞菌、大肠杆菌和金黄色葡萄球菌在尼日利亚伊巴丹各养牛场正常泌乳奶牛的牛奶样本中的流行情况
本研究的目的是确定在乳房区最重要的细菌分离物作为亚临床乳腺炎的致病原因,并调查分离的微生物对抗生素的敏感性。该研究在尼日利亚奥约州伊巴丹市的三个养牛场进行。选取105头明显健康、无乳腺炎症的泌乳奶牛进行乳检;用蘸有酒精的棉絮擦拭乳头并丢弃第一次剥离后进行手工剥离取样。对105头看上去健康的奶牛的四分之四的乳房的牛奶样本进行了培养和分离技术以及生化测试。此外,还对6类抗菌药进行了体外抗菌敏感性试验。采用独立评估检验(卡方检验)确定集体分离的细菌种类与患病动物(p = 0.716)或季度(p = <0.000)之间是否存在关联。研究确定亚临床乳腺炎的存在与已知病原体相关,其中假单胞菌(67.9%)、金黄色葡萄球菌(53.6%)和大肠杆菌(14.3%)的平均百分比按四分之一分布递减最为显著。该研究进一步揭示了不同部位的易感性和感染传播的差异。分离的病原体通常对氟喹诺酮类药物最敏感,而对其他类别的抗菌药物也有不同程度的耐药性,这可能是由于它们的长期和不加区分的使用;这就要求动物卫生保健提供者保持谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of Crossbreeding Between Local and Foreign Strains on the Growth Traits and the Expression of Insulin-Like Growth Factor Genes on Their Chicks Biochemical Changes of Mancozeb-Induced Alternations in Testes and Thyroid gland of Male Albino Rats Effect of DL Methionine Supplementation in Japanese Quail Diets on Growth, Meat Quality and Health Detection of uidA, stx1, and stx2 Genes in Escherichia coli O157:H7 Isolated from Cattle Faecal Matter and River Water Pasteurella multocida Infection in Duck, Detection of Virulence Genes and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of the Isolates
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1