Detection of uidA, stx1, and stx2 Genes in Escherichia coli O157:H7 Isolated from Cattle Faecal Matter and River Water

I. Sule, M. Omokanye, O. Adekunle, Jemilat Abdulkareem, I. Adebesin, Olawuyi Awofisayo, Shamah A. Agboola, Wasilat Abdulwaheed
{"title":"Detection of uidA, stx1, and stx2 Genes in Escherichia coli O157:H7 Isolated from Cattle Faecal Matter and River Water","authors":"I. Sule, M. Omokanye, O. Adekunle, Jemilat Abdulkareem, I. Adebesin, Olawuyi Awofisayo, Shamah A. Agboola, Wasilat Abdulwaheed","doi":"10.5455/ajvs.136270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cattle can harbour enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 serotype in their faecal matters. This study aimed to isolate E. coli O157:H7 from the intestinal digesta, cattle dungs and water; and assess the antibiotic susceptibility and production of shiga toxins by the isolates. The counts of viable bacteria and faecal coliforms in 13 each of intestinal digesta and cattle dung and the 12 water samples were determined using nutrient agar and Eosin methylene blue agar respectively. Sorbitol MacConkey agar (SMAC) was used to screen for E. coli O157:H7 among the 38 E. coli isolates. PCR amplification of uidA genes was used to authenticate the isolates as enterohaemorrhagic E. coli O157:H7 serotype while amplification of stx1 and stx2 showed the production of shiga toxins. The antibiotic susceptibility patterns of the isolates were determined using standard disk diffusion method. The count of viable bacteria and faecal coliform was highest in the intestinal digesta followed by cattle dungs. There was 100% susceptibility to ofloxacin coupled with 100% resistant to augmentin by all the 8 E. coli O157 and 10 non-O157 isolates. The E. coli O157 isolates were more susceptible to ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, ampicillin and cefuroxime than non-O157 isolates but were less susceptible to nitrofurantoin and ceftazidime than non-O157. Eight (44.4%) out of the 18 presumptive E. coli O157 on SMAC amplified uidA genes and were confirmed as E. coli O157. They were isolated only from intestinal digesta and cattle dung. The prevalence of stx1 and stx2 genes among the E. coli O157 was 37.5% and 12.5% respectively. It is concluded from this study that intestinal digesta and cattle dung harboured E. coli O157: H7 some of which possessed shiga toxin.","PeriodicalId":7928,"journal":{"name":"alexandria journal of veterinary sciences","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"alexandria journal of veterinary sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/ajvs.136270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cattle can harbour enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 serotype in their faecal matters. This study aimed to isolate E. coli O157:H7 from the intestinal digesta, cattle dungs and water; and assess the antibiotic susceptibility and production of shiga toxins by the isolates. The counts of viable bacteria and faecal coliforms in 13 each of intestinal digesta and cattle dung and the 12 water samples were determined using nutrient agar and Eosin methylene blue agar respectively. Sorbitol MacConkey agar (SMAC) was used to screen for E. coli O157:H7 among the 38 E. coli isolates. PCR amplification of uidA genes was used to authenticate the isolates as enterohaemorrhagic E. coli O157:H7 serotype while amplification of stx1 and stx2 showed the production of shiga toxins. The antibiotic susceptibility patterns of the isolates were determined using standard disk diffusion method. The count of viable bacteria and faecal coliform was highest in the intestinal digesta followed by cattle dungs. There was 100% susceptibility to ofloxacin coupled with 100% resistant to augmentin by all the 8 E. coli O157 and 10 non-O157 isolates. The E. coli O157 isolates were more susceptible to ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, ampicillin and cefuroxime than non-O157 isolates but were less susceptible to nitrofurantoin and ceftazidime than non-O157. Eight (44.4%) out of the 18 presumptive E. coli O157 on SMAC amplified uidA genes and were confirmed as E. coli O157. They were isolated only from intestinal digesta and cattle dung. The prevalence of stx1 and stx2 genes among the E. coli O157 was 37.5% and 12.5% respectively. It is concluded from this study that intestinal digesta and cattle dung harboured E. coli O157: H7 some of which possessed shiga toxin.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
牛粪便和河水中O157:H7大肠杆菌uidA、stx1和stx2基因的检测
牛的粪便中可能含有肠出血性大肠杆菌O157:H7血清型。本研究旨在从肠道食糜、牛粪和水中分离大肠杆菌O157:H7;并评估菌株的抗生素敏感性和志贺毒素的产生。采用营养琼脂和伊红亚甲基蓝琼脂分别测定了13种肠道食糜、牛粪和12种水样中活菌和粪便大肠菌群的数量。采用山梨醇麦康基琼脂(SMAC)对38株大肠杆菌O157:H7进行筛选。PCR扩增的uidA基因鉴定分离株为肠出血性大肠杆菌O157:H7血清型,扩增的stx1和stx2显示产生志贺毒素。采用标准纸片扩散法测定菌株的药敏型。肠道食糜中活菌和粪大肠菌群数量最高,其次是牛粪。8株O157大肠杆菌和10株非O157大肠杆菌对氧氟沙星的敏感性为100%,对强化素的耐药率为100%。大肠杆菌O157对环丙沙星、庆大霉素、氨苄西林和头孢呋辛的敏感性高于非O157菌株,对呋喃妥因和头孢他啶的敏感性低于非O157菌株。在SMAC上的18株推定O157大肠杆菌中,有8株(44.4%)扩增出uidA基因,证实为O157大肠杆菌。它们仅从肠道食糜和牛粪中分离出来。stx1和stx2基因在大肠杆菌O157中的感染率分别为37.5%和12.5%。本研究认为,肠道食糜和牛粪中含有大肠杆菌O157: H7,其中部分含有志贺毒素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of Crossbreeding Between Local and Foreign Strains on the Growth Traits and the Expression of Insulin-Like Growth Factor Genes on Their Chicks Biochemical Changes of Mancozeb-Induced Alternations in Testes and Thyroid gland of Male Albino Rats Effect of DL Methionine Supplementation in Japanese Quail Diets on Growth, Meat Quality and Health Detection of uidA, stx1, and stx2 Genes in Escherichia coli O157:H7 Isolated from Cattle Faecal Matter and River Water Pasteurella multocida Infection in Duck, Detection of Virulence Genes and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of the Isolates
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1