No Legal Way Out: R v Ryan, Domestic Abuse, and the Defence of Duress by Nadia Verrelli and Lori Chambers

IF 0.8 Q2 LAW OSGOODE HALL LAW JOURNAL Pub Date : 2023-10-26 DOI:10.60082/2817-5069.3928
Abigail March
{"title":"No Legal Way Out: R v Ryan, Domestic Abuse, and the Defence of Duress by Nadia Verrelli and Lori Chambers","authors":"Abigail March","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The defence of duress in Canadian criminal law has been described by scholars and judges as a “complicated mess,” “[o]ften confusing and potentially gendered,” and “irrational, anomalous, perverse, illogical and fundamentally wrong.” The most recent Supreme Court of Canada case to attempt to bring clarity to the embattled duress defence, R v Ryan (“Ryan”), is the focus of Nadia Verrelli and Lori Chambers’ No Legal Way Out: R v Ryan, Domestic Abuse, and the Defence of Duress (“No Legal Way Out”).","PeriodicalId":45757,"journal":{"name":"OSGOODE HALL LAW JOURNAL","volume":"163 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OSGOODE HALL LAW JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.60082/2817-5069.3928","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The defence of duress in Canadian criminal law has been described by scholars and judges as a “complicated mess,” “[o]ften confusing and potentially gendered,” and “irrational, anomalous, perverse, illogical and fundamentally wrong.” The most recent Supreme Court of Canada case to attempt to bring clarity to the embattled duress defence, R v Ryan (“Ryan”), is the focus of Nadia Verrelli and Lori Chambers’ No Legal Way Out: R v Ryan, Domestic Abuse, and the Defence of Duress (“No Legal Way Out”).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《没有法律出路:瑞安诉家庭暴力和对胁迫的辩护》,作者:纳迪亚·维雷利和洛里·钱伯斯
学者和法官将加拿大刑法中对胁迫的辩护描述为“复杂的混乱”,“常常令人困惑,可能带有性别色彩”,“非理性、反常、反常、不合逻辑,根本上是错误的”。加拿大最高法院最近的一个案件试图澄清陷入困境的胁迫辩护,R v Ryan(“Ryan”),这是Nadia Verrelli和Lori Chambers的《无法律出路:R v Ryan,家庭虐待和胁迫辩护》(“无法律出路”)的重点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
14.30%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Provincial Constitutions, the Amending Formula, and Unilateral Amendments to the Constitution of Canada: An Analysis of Quebec’s Bill 96 Peace and Good Order: The Case for Indigenous Justice in Canada by Harold R. Johnson The Elusive Motive Requirement in Canada’s Terrorism Offences: Defining and Distinguishing Ideology, Religion, and Politics Policing in the Shadow of Legality: Pretext, Leveraging, and Investigation Cascades No Legal Way Out: R v Ryan, Domestic Abuse, and the Defence of Duress by Nadia Verrelli and Lori Chambers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1