Diverging Paths

IF 1.7 2区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology Pub Date : 2023-10-26 DOI:10.1558/jma.27147
Adrià Moreno Gil, Marcello Peres, Roberto Risch
{"title":"Diverging Paths","authors":"Adrià Moreno Gil, Marcello Peres, Roberto Risch","doi":"10.1558/jma.27147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the Early Bronze Age (EBA), a relatively small number of European societies developed into highly centralised and hierarchical political entities. In contrast to the intensive research focused on these groups, little attention has been paid to their relationship with neighbouring populations, which had a much more egalitarian structure. In the southeast quadrant of the Iberian Peninsula, over a century of research on the EBA (ca. 2200 –1550 BC) communities has failed to identify distinctive traits leading to the definition of archaeological entities beyond the El Argar group, which according to many authors reached the form of an early state organisation around 1750 BC. This study aims to go beyond previous culturalist approaches and to focus on how communities with very different social organisations interacted in this macro-region as well as in a border region between El Argar and La Mancha. To that effect, we analyse primarily settlement size as an expression of the demographic and economic strength of a community, and ‘enrockment’ (enrocamiento), a concept that defines the degree of protection and spatial distancing of a settlement from its surrounding land and neighbouring communities. This large-scale comparative approach reveals the distinctiveness of highly dispersed and well-protected communities settling in the belt immediately north of El Argar and shows how this cost-intensive strategy changes with increasing distance from El Argar, when flat land and often larger settlements become dominant. The combination of settlement patterns and economic organisation also highlights the marked differences between El Argar and all the other communities living in the Iberian Peninsula.","PeriodicalId":45203,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology","volume":"103 2-3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1558/jma.27147","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the Early Bronze Age (EBA), a relatively small number of European societies developed into highly centralised and hierarchical political entities. In contrast to the intensive research focused on these groups, little attention has been paid to their relationship with neighbouring populations, which had a much more egalitarian structure. In the southeast quadrant of the Iberian Peninsula, over a century of research on the EBA (ca. 2200 –1550 BC) communities has failed to identify distinctive traits leading to the definition of archaeological entities beyond the El Argar group, which according to many authors reached the form of an early state organisation around 1750 BC. This study aims to go beyond previous culturalist approaches and to focus on how communities with very different social organisations interacted in this macro-region as well as in a border region between El Argar and La Mancha. To that effect, we analyse primarily settlement size as an expression of the demographic and economic strength of a community, and ‘enrockment’ (enrocamiento), a concept that defines the degree of protection and spatial distancing of a settlement from its surrounding land and neighbouring communities. This large-scale comparative approach reveals the distinctiveness of highly dispersed and well-protected communities settling in the belt immediately north of El Argar and shows how this cost-intensive strategy changes with increasing distance from El Argar, when flat land and often larger settlements become dominant. The combination of settlement patterns and economic organisation also highlights the marked differences between El Argar and all the other communities living in the Iberian Peninsula.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同的路径
在早期青铜器时代(EBA),相对较少的欧洲社会发展成为高度集中和等级制的政治实体。与集中于这些群体的深入研究相比,很少注意到他们与邻近人口的关系,这些人口具有更加平等的结构。在伊比利亚半岛的东南四分之一,对EBA(约公元前2200 -1550年)社区进行了一个多世纪的研究,但未能识别出独特的特征,导致了对El Argar群体之外的考古实体的定义,根据许多作者的说法,El Argar群体在公元前1750年左右达到了早期国家组织的形式。这项研究的目的是超越以前的文化主义方法,并关注具有不同社会组织的社区如何在这个宏观地区以及在El Argar和La Mancha之间的边境地区相互作用。为此,我们主要分析了聚落规模作为社区人口和经济实力的表达,以及“聚落”(enrocamiento),这是一个定义聚落与周围土地和邻近社区的保护程度和空间距离的概念。这种大规模的比较方法揭示了定居在El Argar北部地带的高度分散和保护良好的社区的独特性,并表明当平坦的土地和通常较大的定居点占主导地位时,这种成本密集型战略如何随着距离El Argar的增加而变化。定居模式和经济组织的结合也突出了El Argar与生活在伊比利亚半岛的所有其他社区之间的显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊介绍: JMA currently operates as the most progressive and valid podium for archaeological discussion and debate in Europe European Journal of Archaeology Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology is the only journal currently published that deals with the entire multicultural world of Mediterranean archaeology. The journal publishes material that deals with, amongst others, the social, politicoeconomic and ideological aspects of local or regional production and development, and of social interaction and change in the Mediterranean.
期刊最新文献
Diverging Paths A Necessary Debate Myopic Misunderstandings? Vitamin D Status among the Population Visiting Jigme Dorji Wangchuck National Referral Hospital, Bhutan. Supplementary Materials for 'From the Ground Up: Modelling Agricultural Landscapes in Early Iron Age East Crete Using Legacy Survey Data and GIS'
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1