Effect of Phytonadione on Correction of Coagulopathy in Pediatric Patients With Septic Shock

Katy Stephens, Jamie L. Miller, Maura Harkin, Stephen B. Neely, Laura Haws, Peter N. Johnson
{"title":"Effect of Phytonadione on Correction of Coagulopathy in Pediatric Patients With Septic Shock","authors":"Katy Stephens, Jamie L. Miller, Maura Harkin, Stephen B. Neely, Laura Haws, Peter N. Johnson","doi":"10.5863/1551-6776-28.5.423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to evaluate phytonadione in children with septic shock with disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (DIC). The primary objective was to identify the number of patients with an international normalized ratio (INR), defined as ≤1.2, following phytonadione. Secondary objectives were to compare patients who achieved a normalized INR versus those with INR >1.2 and to determine factors associated with a normalized INR. METHODS A retrospective study of children <18 years of age receiving phytonadione from October 1, 2013, to August 31, 2020, with a diagnosis of septic shock, were included. Data collection included demographics, phytonadione regimen, INR values, Pediatric Index of Mortality 2 (PIM2) and Pediatric Risk of Mortality III (PRISM III) scores, fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and cryoprecipitate use. A logistic regression model and generalized linear model were used to explore factors associated with a normalized INR and evaluate phytonadione dosing. RESULTS Data for initial phytonadione course for 156 patients were evaluated. Sixty-six (42.3%) patients had a normalized INR. Most patients (n = 145; 92.9%) received ≤3 phytonadione doses, with the largest reduction in INR occurring after the second dose. In the logistic regression model, baseline INR, FFP, cryoprecipitate, vasopressors, PIM2, PRISM III, or cumulative phytonadione dose were not associated with achieving a normalized INR. CONCLUSIONS Less than half of patients achieved a normalized INR. The median cumulative dose of phytonadione and receipt of FFP or cryoprecipitate was not associated with an increased odds of a normalized INR. Future studies are needed to further explore phytonadione use in children with sepsis-induced coagulopathy.","PeriodicalId":22794,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5863/1551-6776-28.5.423","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to evaluate phytonadione in children with septic shock with disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (DIC). The primary objective was to identify the number of patients with an international normalized ratio (INR), defined as ≤1.2, following phytonadione. Secondary objectives were to compare patients who achieved a normalized INR versus those with INR >1.2 and to determine factors associated with a normalized INR. METHODS A retrospective study of children <18 years of age receiving phytonadione from October 1, 2013, to August 31, 2020, with a diagnosis of septic shock, were included. Data collection included demographics, phytonadione regimen, INR values, Pediatric Index of Mortality 2 (PIM2) and Pediatric Risk of Mortality III (PRISM III) scores, fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and cryoprecipitate use. A logistic regression model and generalized linear model were used to explore factors associated with a normalized INR and evaluate phytonadione dosing. RESULTS Data for initial phytonadione course for 156 patients were evaluated. Sixty-six (42.3%) patients had a normalized INR. Most patients (n = 145; 92.9%) received ≤3 phytonadione doses, with the largest reduction in INR occurring after the second dose. In the logistic regression model, baseline INR, FFP, cryoprecipitate, vasopressors, PIM2, PRISM III, or cumulative phytonadione dose were not associated with achieving a normalized INR. CONCLUSIONS Less than half of patients achieved a normalized INR. The median cumulative dose of phytonadione and receipt of FFP or cryoprecipitate was not associated with an increased odds of a normalized INR. Future studies are needed to further explore phytonadione use in children with sepsis-induced coagulopathy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
植物二酮治疗感染性休克患儿凝血功能障碍的疗效观察
目的:本研究的目的是评估植物二酮在感染性休克合并弥散性血管内凝血病(DIC)患儿中的应用。主要目的是确定使用植物二酮后具有国际标准化比率(INR)(定义为≤1.2)的患者数量。次要目标是比较INR达到正常化的患者与INR为1.2的患者,并确定与INR正常化相关的因素。方法回顾性研究2013年10月1日至2020年8月31日期间接受植物二酮治疗并诊断为感染性休克的18岁儿童。数据收集包括人口统计学、植物二酮方案、INR值、儿童死亡率指数2 (PIM2)和儿童死亡率风险III (PRISM III)评分、新鲜冷冻血浆(FFP)和冷冻沉淀使用。使用逻辑回归模型和广义线性模型来探索与标准化INR相关的因素并评估植物二酮的剂量。结果对156例患者的初始植物二酮疗程进行了评估。66例(42.3%)患者INR正常化。大多数患者(n = 145;92.9%)接受≤3剂量的植物二酮治疗,第二次剂量后INR下降幅度最大。在logistic回归模型中,基线INR、FFP、冷沉淀、血管加压药、PIM2、PRISM III或累积植物二酮剂量与实现标准化INR无关。结论:不到一半的患者达到了正常的INR。植物二酮的中位累积剂量和接受FFP或低温沉淀与标准化INR的几率增加无关。未来的研究需要进一步探索植物二酮在败血症诱导凝血病患儿中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor on Pseudomonas aeruginosa Acquisition and Chronic Infection at a Single Pediatric Cystic Fibrosis Care Center The Precompetitive Space for Drug or Vaccine Development: What Does It Look Like Now and What Could It Look Like in the Future? Ethanol Lock for Prevention of CVC-Related Bloodstream Infection in Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Effect of Phytonadione on Correction of Coagulopathy in Pediatric Patients With Septic Shock Comparison of Outcomes in Neonates Receiving Cefepime or Ceftazidime
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1