Making Beethoven Black: The New Negro Movement, Black Internationalism, and the Rewriting of Music History

IF 0.5 2区 艺术学 0 MUSIC Twentieth-Century Music Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1017/s1478572223000166
KIRA THURMAN
{"title":"Making Beethoven Black: The New Negro Movement, Black Internationalism, and the Rewriting of Music History","authors":"KIRA THURMAN","doi":"10.1017/s1478572223000166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract While the idea that Beethoven had African ancestry became popular in the 1960s during the Civil Rights struggle in the United States, its conception arose during an earlier moment: the global New Negro movement of the 1920s. Appearing in newspaper columns, music journals, and essays, Black American writings on Beethoven challenged white musicians’ claims to the canon of Bach, Beethoven, and Brahms. This article argues that the project of making Beethoven Black belonged to a greater and more ambitious endeavour to rewrite Western music history. Black musicologists sought to globalize the Western canon, and in so doing, critique its grand narratives. Locating Black musical idioms in eighteenth-century piano sonatas or conducting archival research on Black European figures such as George Bridgetower, their music histories challenged readers to re-examine just who, exactly, had contributed to the project of cultural modernity and on what grounds.","PeriodicalId":43259,"journal":{"name":"Twentieth-Century Music","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Twentieth-Century Music","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1478572223000166","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract While the idea that Beethoven had African ancestry became popular in the 1960s during the Civil Rights struggle in the United States, its conception arose during an earlier moment: the global New Negro movement of the 1920s. Appearing in newspaper columns, music journals, and essays, Black American writings on Beethoven challenged white musicians’ claims to the canon of Bach, Beethoven, and Brahms. This article argues that the project of making Beethoven Black belonged to a greater and more ambitious endeavour to rewrite Western music history. Black musicologists sought to globalize the Western canon, and in so doing, critique its grand narratives. Locating Black musical idioms in eighteenth-century piano sonatas or conducting archival research on Black European figures such as George Bridgetower, their music histories challenged readers to re-examine just who, exactly, had contributed to the project of cultural modernity and on what grounds.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《使贝多芬变黑:新黑人运动、黑人国际主义和音乐史的改写》
虽然贝多芬有非洲血统的观点在20世纪60年代美国民权运动期间开始流行,但它的概念在更早的时候就出现了:20世纪20年代的全球新黑人运动。美国黑人关于贝多芬的文章出现在报纸专栏、音乐杂志和文章中,挑战了白人音乐家对巴赫、贝多芬和勃拉姆斯经典的主张。本文认为,使贝多芬变黑的计划属于一个更伟大和更雄心勃勃的努力,以改写西方音乐史。黑人音乐学家试图将西方经典音乐全球化,并以此批评其宏大的叙事。在18世纪钢琴奏鸣曲中找到黑人音乐习语,或者对乔治·布里奇托等欧洲黑人人物进行档案研究,他们的音乐史挑战读者重新审视到底是谁为文化现代性项目做出了贡献,以及在什么基础上做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Solitary Listening, Copyright, and Reification during the Interwar Years: A Discourse Theoretic Approach Neoliberal Reason, Contemporary Music, and Proximal Critique The Panama Songs: Colonial Structures in US Popular Music between 1900 and 1920 The British (and International?) Music Society: Australian Identity and Musical Internationalism in Interwar Sydney Whiteness and the Problem of Colourblind Listening: Revisiting Leonard Feather's 1951 Blindfold Test with Roy Eldridge
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1