Whiteness and the Problem of Colourblind Listening: Revisiting Leonard Feather's 1951 Blindfold Test with Roy Eldridge

IF 0.5 2区 艺术学 0 MUSIC Twentieth-Century Music Pub Date : 2024-03-04 DOI:10.1017/s1478572224000033
MIKKEL VAD
{"title":"Whiteness and the Problem of Colourblind Listening: Revisiting Leonard Feather's 1951 Blindfold Test with Roy Eldridge","authors":"MIKKEL VAD","doi":"10.1017/s1478572224000033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"‘I couldn't tell who was colored and who was white’, admitted the African American trumpet player Roy Eldridge after being submitted to a so-called blindfold test by the white critic Leonard Feather in 1951. Feather was happy that the blindfold test duped a prominent Black musician, because it proved his point about the fundamental colourblindness of music and listening. Through close reading of the source material, this article provides the full context for this infamous case and shows how the blindfold test was a product of transnational discourses of colourblindness, primitivism, ‘reverse racism’, and technological mediation. Building on current research in racialized practices of listening in musicology and sound studies, and mobilizing interventions from critical race studies, the article contends that acousmatic techniques of listening often promote a colourblind ideology invested in whiteness, which remains hegemonic in music culture.","PeriodicalId":43259,"journal":{"name":"Twentieth-Century Music","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Twentieth-Century Music","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1478572224000033","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

‘I couldn't tell who was colored and who was white’, admitted the African American trumpet player Roy Eldridge after being submitted to a so-called blindfold test by the white critic Leonard Feather in 1951. Feather was happy that the blindfold test duped a prominent Black musician, because it proved his point about the fundamental colourblindness of music and listening. Through close reading of the source material, this article provides the full context for this infamous case and shows how the blindfold test was a product of transnational discourses of colourblindness, primitivism, ‘reverse racism’, and technological mediation. Building on current research in racialized practices of listening in musicology and sound studies, and mobilizing interventions from critical race studies, the article contends that acousmatic techniques of listening often promote a colourblind ideology invested in whiteness, which remains hegemonic in music culture.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
白人与色盲听力问题:与罗伊-埃尔德里奇一起重温伦纳德-费瑟 1951 年的蒙眼测试
1951 年,美国黑人小号演奏家罗伊-埃尔德里奇(Roy Eldridge)在接受白人评论家伦纳德-费瑟(Leonard Feather)的所谓蒙眼测试后承认,"我分不清谁是黑人,谁是白人"。费瑟很高兴蒙眼测试让一位杰出的黑人音乐家上当受骗,因为这证明了他的观点,即音乐和听觉的基本色盲。通过仔细阅读原始资料,本文提供了这一臭名昭著的案例的全部背景,并说明了蒙眼测试是色盲、原始主义、"逆向种族主义 "和技术中介等跨国论述的产物。文章以当前音乐学和声音研究中对种族化聆听实践的研究为基础,调动批判性种族研究的干预措施,论证了声学聆听技术往往助长了以白人为核心的色盲意识形态,而这种意识形态在音乐文化中仍然占据霸权地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Solitary Listening, Copyright, and Reification during the Interwar Years: A Discourse Theoretic Approach Neoliberal Reason, Contemporary Music, and Proximal Critique The Panama Songs: Colonial Structures in US Popular Music between 1900 and 1920 The British (and International?) Music Society: Australian Identity and Musical Internationalism in Interwar Sydney Whiteness and the Problem of Colourblind Listening: Revisiting Leonard Feather's 1951 Blindfold Test with Roy Eldridge
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1