{"title":"Optimization of Thromboprophylaxis Use in Hospitalized Pediatric Patients Through Implementation of a Venous Thromboembolism Risk Assessment Tool","authors":"Airka Sanchez, Lauren Campanella, Kimberly Perez","doi":"10.5863/1551-6776-28.5.452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of hospital-acquired morbidity for pediatric patients. Pharmacological thromboprophylaxis increases the risk of adverse events such as bleeding complications. There exists a need for a universal VTE risk assessment tool to aid in thromboprophylaxis prescribing while minimizing the risk of adverse events. The objective of this study is to investigate if implementation of a VTE risk assessment tool is associated with a change in the rate of thromboprophylaxis prescribing. METHODS This retrospective study evaluated the change in thromboprophylaxis prescribing pre and post implementation of a VTE risk assessment tool. Patients were excluded if they were pregnant, diagnosed with VTE ≤48 hours of admission, presented with VTE symptoms, or if they were diagnosed with multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) or coronavirus disease (COVID-19). RESULTS A total of 186 pediatric patients were included in this study. Thromboprophylaxis was prescribed in 16/93 (17.12%) and 75/93 (80.6%) patients in the pre- and post-implementation group, respectively (95% CI, 0.523–0.745; p < 0.001). No VTE events occurred in either group. Bleeding complications occurred in 3.2% and 7.5% of patients in the pre- and post-implementation groups, respectively. The risk tool was used in 80.6% of patients; providers used the tool correctly in 48% of patients and incorrectly in 52% of patients. CONCLUSION Implementation of a VTE risk assessment tool was associated with a statistically significant change in the rate of thromboprophylaxis prescribing. Incorrect use may be minimized by providing provider reeducation and making modifications to the order set.","PeriodicalId":22794,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5863/1551-6776-28.5.452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of hospital-acquired morbidity for pediatric patients. Pharmacological thromboprophylaxis increases the risk of adverse events such as bleeding complications. There exists a need for a universal VTE risk assessment tool to aid in thromboprophylaxis prescribing while minimizing the risk of adverse events. The objective of this study is to investigate if implementation of a VTE risk assessment tool is associated with a change in the rate of thromboprophylaxis prescribing. METHODS This retrospective study evaluated the change in thromboprophylaxis prescribing pre and post implementation of a VTE risk assessment tool. Patients were excluded if they were pregnant, diagnosed with VTE ≤48 hours of admission, presented with VTE symptoms, or if they were diagnosed with multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) or coronavirus disease (COVID-19). RESULTS A total of 186 pediatric patients were included in this study. Thromboprophylaxis was prescribed in 16/93 (17.12%) and 75/93 (80.6%) patients in the pre- and post-implementation group, respectively (95% CI, 0.523–0.745; p < 0.001). No VTE events occurred in either group. Bleeding complications occurred in 3.2% and 7.5% of patients in the pre- and post-implementation groups, respectively. The risk tool was used in 80.6% of patients; providers used the tool correctly in 48% of patients and incorrectly in 52% of patients. CONCLUSION Implementation of a VTE risk assessment tool was associated with a statistically significant change in the rate of thromboprophylaxis prescribing. Incorrect use may be minimized by providing provider reeducation and making modifications to the order set.