Introduction to the Special Issue on Global Musical Modernisms

IF 0.5 2区 艺术学 0 MUSIC Twentieth-Century Music Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1017/s1478572223000142
GAVIN S. K. LEE, CHRISTOPHER J. MILLER
{"title":"Introduction to the Special Issue on Global Musical Modernisms","authors":"GAVIN S. K. LEE, CHRISTOPHER J. MILLER","doi":"10.1017/s1478572223000142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Global Musical Modernisms – the formulation heralds expansion into new arenas of music research. 1 For while certain pairings of the component terms are familiar enough, the concatenation of all three is novel. In music studies, the most notable trend is the flurry of activity around global music history, with study groups in two societies historically focused on Western musics, and one focused on ethnomusicology. 2 Global music history derives strength and in turn strengthens movement towards disciplinary convergence, or at least greater interaction – an important precondition for the study of global musical modernisms. 3 There has also been renewed interest in musical modernism, though not so much, at least at first glance, in the direction of the global, and with less interdisciplinary synergy. By contrast, the global figures very prominently in what has been termed the ‘new modernist studies’, a field that coalesced in the late 1990s. 4 As one indication, its global turn had gathered enough momentum for Oxford University Press to publish a handbook on ‘Global Modernisms’ in 2013, just three years after its handbook on ‘Modernisms’. 5 Despite aspirations to coverage of modernism in all its forms, the field is populated predominantly by literary scholars, with minimal attention to music.","PeriodicalId":43259,"journal":{"name":"Twentieth-Century Music","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Twentieth-Century Music","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1478572223000142","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Global Musical Modernisms – the formulation heralds expansion into new arenas of music research. 1 For while certain pairings of the component terms are familiar enough, the concatenation of all three is novel. In music studies, the most notable trend is the flurry of activity around global music history, with study groups in two societies historically focused on Western musics, and one focused on ethnomusicology. 2 Global music history derives strength and in turn strengthens movement towards disciplinary convergence, or at least greater interaction – an important precondition for the study of global musical modernisms. 3 There has also been renewed interest in musical modernism, though not so much, at least at first glance, in the direction of the global, and with less interdisciplinary synergy. By contrast, the global figures very prominently in what has been termed the ‘new modernist studies’, a field that coalesced in the late 1990s. 4 As one indication, its global turn had gathered enough momentum for Oxford University Press to publish a handbook on ‘Global Modernisms’ in 2013, just three years after its handbook on ‘Modernisms’. 5 Despite aspirations to coverage of modernism in all its forms, the field is populated predominantly by literary scholars, with minimal attention to music.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全球音乐现代主义特刊导言
全球音乐现代主义-公式预示着扩展到音乐研究的新领域。虽然组成术语的某些配对已经足够熟悉了,但这三个术语的连接却是新奇的。在音乐研究中,最引人注目的趋势是围绕全球音乐史的一系列活动,两个社会的研究小组在历史上专注于西方音乐,而一个则专注于民族音乐学。全球音乐史产生力量,反过来又加强了学科融合的运动,或者至少是更大的互动——这是研究全球音乐现代主义的一个重要前提。人们对音乐现代主义也重新产生了兴趣,尽管至少乍一看,在全球的方向上没有那么多,跨学科的协同作用也少了。相比之下,全球人物在被称为“新现代主义研究”的领域中非常突出,这是一个在20世纪90年代末合并的领域。作为一个迹象,它的全球转向已经聚集了足够的势头,牛津大学出版社在2013年出版了一本关于“全球现代主义”的手册,就在《现代主义》手册出版三年后。尽管渴望涵盖所有形式的现代主义,但该领域主要由文学学者组成,很少关注音乐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Solitary Listening, Copyright, and Reification during the Interwar Years: A Discourse Theoretic Approach Neoliberal Reason, Contemporary Music, and Proximal Critique The Panama Songs: Colonial Structures in US Popular Music between 1900 and 1920 The British (and International?) Music Society: Australian Identity and Musical Internationalism in Interwar Sydney Whiteness and the Problem of Colourblind Listening: Revisiting Leonard Feather's 1951 Blindfold Test with Roy Eldridge
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1