Challenging the protest paradigm and winning legitimacy. Analysis of the representation of the social movement against femicide in the mainstream media in Mexico

IF 1.9 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY Current Sociology Pub Date : 2023-11-14 DOI:10.1177/00113921231211578
Mariana Aldrete
{"title":"Challenging the protest paradigm and winning legitimacy. Analysis of the representation of the social movement against femicide in the mainstream media in Mexico","authors":"Mariana Aldrete","doi":"10.1177/00113921231211578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous studies found a tendency for negative representations of social movements in the media in the so-called ‘protest paradigm’. This work proposes a methodology using the paradigm as a framework and operationalizing its characteristics into neutral variables: emphasis, prominence, legitimacy, and tone. In addition, the political elite-media relationship is included as an analytical dimension to better understand the factors that produce media representations of social movements. The empirical focus is the representation of the movement against femicide in three Mexican national news outlets with different political leanings, from 2014 to 2017, gathering N = 865 news articles. The articles were coded using the qualitative content analysis technique. Each variable was coded to measure the representation of the movement and the authorities. The results show that the detriment to one actor’s legitimacy can benefit the other’s representation, suggesting an interdependent system formed by the political elite, the media, and the social movements.","PeriodicalId":47938,"journal":{"name":"Current Sociology","volume":"28 26","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00113921231211578","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous studies found a tendency for negative representations of social movements in the media in the so-called ‘protest paradigm’. This work proposes a methodology using the paradigm as a framework and operationalizing its characteristics into neutral variables: emphasis, prominence, legitimacy, and tone. In addition, the political elite-media relationship is included as an analytical dimension to better understand the factors that produce media representations of social movements. The empirical focus is the representation of the movement against femicide in three Mexican national news outlets with different political leanings, from 2014 to 2017, gathering N = 865 news articles. The articles were coded using the qualitative content analysis technique. Each variable was coded to measure the representation of the movement and the authorities. The results show that the detriment to one actor’s legitimacy can benefit the other’s representation, suggesting an interdependent system formed by the political elite, the media, and the social movements.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
挑战抗议模式,赢得合法性。墨西哥主流媒体对反对杀害妇女的社会运动的报道分析
先前的研究发现,在所谓的“抗议范式”中,媒体倾向于对社会运动进行负面描述。这项工作提出了一种使用范式作为框架的方法,并将其特征操作化为中性变量:强调,突出,合法性和语气。此外,政治精英与媒体的关系被作为一个分析维度,以更好地理解产生社会运动的媒体表征的因素。实证研究的重点是2014年至2017年,墨西哥三家不同政治倾向的国家新闻媒体对反对杀害妇女运动的代表性,共收集了N = 865篇新闻报道。采用定性内容分析技术对文章进行编码。每个变量都被编码以衡量运动和权威的表现。结果表明,对一方行为者合法性的损害可能有利于另一方的代表,这表明政治精英、媒体和社会运动形成了一个相互依存的系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Sociology
Current Sociology SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Current Sociology is a fully peer-reviewed, international journal that publishes original research and innovative critical commentary both on current debates within sociology as a developing discipline, and the contribution that sociologists can make to understanding and influencing current issues arising in the development of modern societies in a globalizing world. An official journal of the International Sociological Association since 1952, Current Sociology is one of the oldest and most widely cited sociology journals in the world.
期刊最新文献
Dissenting and innovating: Freelancers’ emerging forms of organising in the Netherlands The German social space and its homologies: National variation on a basic structure Scapegoating queers: Pink-blocking as state strategy Southern theory, knowledge production and Russia’s war in Ukraine: An interview with Raewyn Connell Do countries’ freedom status and gender equality level inform gender differences in bribery? Evidence from a multi-country level analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1