Do countries’ freedom status and gender equality level inform gender differences in bribery? Evidence from a multi-country level analysis

IF 1.9 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY Current Sociology Pub Date : 2023-12-04 DOI:10.1177/00113921231217499
E. Dim, J. Asomah, Yiyan Li
{"title":"Do countries’ freedom status and gender equality level inform gender differences in bribery? Evidence from a multi-country level analysis","authors":"E. Dim, J. Asomah, Yiyan Li","doi":"10.1177/00113921231217499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Given the continuing debate on whether women are less corrupt than men, this study investigates the socio-political context in which men and women give bribes based on the seventh round of the Afrobarometer multi-country data set. We also seek to understand how a country’s freedom status and gender equality level inform the extent to which women and men are likely to be involved in corruption. In doing so, the study focuses on the influence of gender status, the number of female legislators, gender equality, and political freedom on bribe-giving among men and women. Research results indicate that (1) women in Africa are less likely to pay bribes than men, controlling both macro-level and micro-level factors, (2) women are less likely than men to give bribes in countries with high gender equality, and (3) the tendency for women to give bribes is the lowest in politically free countries. However, the inclination of women’s bribery reached the highest level among countries with partial political freedom. This study extends the theoretical and empirical understanding of the context within which women are more or less likely to give bribes, especially in the global South.","PeriodicalId":47938,"journal":{"name":"Current Sociology","volume":"36 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00113921231217499","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Given the continuing debate on whether women are less corrupt than men, this study investigates the socio-political context in which men and women give bribes based on the seventh round of the Afrobarometer multi-country data set. We also seek to understand how a country’s freedom status and gender equality level inform the extent to which women and men are likely to be involved in corruption. In doing so, the study focuses on the influence of gender status, the number of female legislators, gender equality, and political freedom on bribe-giving among men and women. Research results indicate that (1) women in Africa are less likely to pay bribes than men, controlling both macro-level and micro-level factors, (2) women are less likely than men to give bribes in countries with high gender equality, and (3) the tendency for women to give bribes is the lowest in politically free countries. However, the inclination of women’s bribery reached the highest level among countries with partial political freedom. This study extends the theoretical and empirical understanding of the context within which women are more or less likely to give bribes, especially in the global South.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国家的自由状况和性别平等水平是否会影响贿赂中的性别差异?来自多国分析的证据
鉴于关于女性是否比男性更腐败的持续争论,本研究基于非洲晴雨表第七轮多国数据集调查了男性和女性行贿的社会政治背景。我们还试图了解一个国家的自由状况和性别平等水平如何影响女性和男性可能卷入腐败的程度。在此过程中,该研究侧重于性别地位、女议员人数、性别平等和政治自由对男女贿赂行为的影响。研究结果表明:(1)在控制宏观和微观因素的情况下,非洲女性行贿的可能性低于男性;(2)在性别平等程度较高的国家,女性行贿的可能性低于男性;(3)在政治自由的国家,女性行贿的倾向最低。然而,在政治部分自由的国家中,女性的贿赂倾向达到了最高水平。这项研究扩展了对妇女或多或少可能行贿的背景的理论和实证理解,特别是在全球南方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Sociology
Current Sociology SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Current Sociology is a fully peer-reviewed, international journal that publishes original research and innovative critical commentary both on current debates within sociology as a developing discipline, and the contribution that sociologists can make to understanding and influencing current issues arising in the development of modern societies in a globalizing world. An official journal of the International Sociological Association since 1952, Current Sociology is one of the oldest and most widely cited sociology journals in the world.
期刊最新文献
Dissenting and innovating: Freelancers’ emerging forms of organising in the Netherlands The German social space and its homologies: National variation on a basic structure Scapegoating queers: Pink-blocking as state strategy Southern theory, knowledge production and Russia’s war in Ukraine: An interview with Raewyn Connell Do countries’ freedom status and gender equality level inform gender differences in bribery? Evidence from a multi-country level analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1