The Clinical Anesthesia Effect of Remifentanil Combined with Propofol in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in the Elderly

Li Fan
{"title":"The Clinical Anesthesia Effect of Remifentanil Combined with Propofol in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in the Elderly","authors":"Li Fan","doi":"10.26689/aogr.v1i2.5293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To explore and analyze the effect of remifentanil combined with propofol for anesthesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and to explore its clinical application value. Methods: A total of 64 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy were selected and randomly divided into two groups, with 32 patients in each group. The anesthesia used in the control group was propofol combined with fentanyl, whereas the observation group was propofol combined with remifentanil and fentanyl. Medical staff routinely performed thyroidectomy on the patients after receiving anesthesia. After the treatment was completed, the researchers recorded the adverse reactions of the patients and the anesthesia effect during laparoscopic cholecystectomy and analyzed the anesthesia effect of the patients. Results: After the operation, the excellent and good rates of anesthesia in the observation group were significantly higher (P < 0.05). Pain in the observation group was significantly lower (P < 0.05). The clinical indicators after receiving anesthesia were significantly better in the observation group (P < 0.05). During the operation period, the two groups had different degrees of adverse reactions, while the incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was relatively lower (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Patients in the observation group showed better anesthesia and lower pain levels during surgery, higher excellent and good rates of anesthesia, lower VAS scores, and better anesthesia indicators. Therefore, remifentanil-propofol combined anesthesia can be used as an effective anesthesia option in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, which improves the anesthesia effect during the operation and the postoperative pain control of patients and has clinical application value.","PeriodicalId":269611,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Obstetrics and Gynecology Research","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Obstetrics and Gynecology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26689/aogr.v1i2.5293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore and analyze the effect of remifentanil combined with propofol for anesthesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and to explore its clinical application value. Methods: A total of 64 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy were selected and randomly divided into two groups, with 32 patients in each group. The anesthesia used in the control group was propofol combined with fentanyl, whereas the observation group was propofol combined with remifentanil and fentanyl. Medical staff routinely performed thyroidectomy on the patients after receiving anesthesia. After the treatment was completed, the researchers recorded the adverse reactions of the patients and the anesthesia effect during laparoscopic cholecystectomy and analyzed the anesthesia effect of the patients. Results: After the operation, the excellent and good rates of anesthesia in the observation group were significantly higher (P < 0.05). Pain in the observation group was significantly lower (P < 0.05). The clinical indicators after receiving anesthesia were significantly better in the observation group (P < 0.05). During the operation period, the two groups had different degrees of adverse reactions, while the incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was relatively lower (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Patients in the observation group showed better anesthesia and lower pain levels during surgery, higher excellent and good rates of anesthesia, lower VAS scores, and better anesthesia indicators. Therefore, remifentanil-propofol combined anesthesia can be used as an effective anesthesia option in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, which improves the anesthesia effect during the operation and the postoperative pain control of patients and has clinical application value.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
瑞芬太尼联合异丙酚在老年腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的临床麻醉效果
目的:探讨和分析瑞芬太尼联合异丙酚在腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者中的麻醉效果,并探讨其临床应用价值。方法:选择行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者64例,随机分为两组,每组32例。对照组采用异丙酚联合芬太尼麻醉,观察组采用异丙酚联合瑞芬太尼和芬太尼麻醉。医务人员在麻醉后常规对患者行甲状腺切除术。治疗完成后,记录患者在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的不良反应及麻醉效果,并对患者的麻醉效果进行分析。结果:术后观察组麻醉优良率、优良率均显著高于对照组(P <0.05)。观察组患者疼痛明显减轻(P <0.05)。观察组麻醉后临床指标明显优于对照组(P <0.05)。手术期间,两组患者均有不同程度的不良反应发生,但观察组不良反应发生率相对较低(P <0.05)。结论:观察组患者术中麻醉效果较好,疼痛程度较低,麻醉优良率较高,VAS评分较低,麻醉指标较好。因此,瑞芬太尼-异丙酚复合麻醉可作为腹腔镜胆囊切除术的有效麻醉选择,提高术中麻醉效果和患者术后疼痛控制,具有临床应用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Examining Clinical Application Value of Uterine Compression Suture in the Treatment of Postpartum Hemorrhage Efficacy Analysis of Misoprostol Tablets for Painless Abortion Effect of Carboprost Tromethamine Combined with Uterine Strap Suture in the Treatment of Patients with Postpartum Hemorrhage Caused by Uterine Atony Analyzing the Application Value and Detection Rate of Combined Abdominal and Vaginal B-Scan Ultrasound in Diagnosing Acute Abdomen in Obstetrics and Gynecology The Clinical Anesthesia Effect of Remifentanil Combined with Propofol in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in the Elderly
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1