Debrina Roy, Nicole Calpin, Kathy Cheng, Alison Olechowski, Andrea Arguelles, Nicolás F. Soria Zurita, Jessica Menold
{"title":"Designing Together: Exploring Collaborative Dynamics of Multi-Objective Design Problems in Virtual Environments","authors":"Debrina Roy, Nicole Calpin, Kathy Cheng, Alison Olechowski, Andrea Arguelles, Nicolás F. Soria Zurita, Jessica Menold","doi":"10.1115/1.4063658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The pace of technological advancements has been rapidly increasing in recent years, with the advent of artificial intelligence, virtual/augmented reality, and other emerging technologies fundamentally changing the way human beings work. The adoption and integration of these advanced technologies necessitates teams with diverse disciplinary expertise, to help teams remain agile to an ever-evolving technological landscape. Significant disciplinary diversity amongst teams however can be detrimental to team communication and performance. Additionally, accelerated by the COVID-19 Pandemic, the adoption and use of technologies that enable design teams to collaborate across significant geographical distances has become the norm in today's work environments, further complicating communication, and performance issues. Little is known about the way in which technology mediated communication affects the collaborative processes of design. As a first step towards filling this gap, the current work explores the fundamental ways experts from distinct disciplinary backgrounds collaborate in virtual design environments. Specifically, we explore the conversational dynamics between experts from two distinct fields: Non-Destructive Evaluation (NDE) and Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM). Using Markov Modeling, the study identified distinct communicative patterns that emerged during collaborative design efforts. Our findings suggest that traditional assumptions regarding communication patterns and design outcomes may not be applicable to expert design teams working in virtual environments.","PeriodicalId":50137,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mechanical Design","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mechanical Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4063658","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract The pace of technological advancements has been rapidly increasing in recent years, with the advent of artificial intelligence, virtual/augmented reality, and other emerging technologies fundamentally changing the way human beings work. The adoption and integration of these advanced technologies necessitates teams with diverse disciplinary expertise, to help teams remain agile to an ever-evolving technological landscape. Significant disciplinary diversity amongst teams however can be detrimental to team communication and performance. Additionally, accelerated by the COVID-19 Pandemic, the adoption and use of technologies that enable design teams to collaborate across significant geographical distances has become the norm in today's work environments, further complicating communication, and performance issues. Little is known about the way in which technology mediated communication affects the collaborative processes of design. As a first step towards filling this gap, the current work explores the fundamental ways experts from distinct disciplinary backgrounds collaborate in virtual design environments. Specifically, we explore the conversational dynamics between experts from two distinct fields: Non-Destructive Evaluation (NDE) and Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM). Using Markov Modeling, the study identified distinct communicative patterns that emerged during collaborative design efforts. Our findings suggest that traditional assumptions regarding communication patterns and design outcomes may not be applicable to expert design teams working in virtual environments.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Mechanical Design (JMD) serves the broad design community as the venue for scholarly, archival research in all aspects of the design activity with emphasis on design synthesis. JMD has traditionally served the ASME Design Engineering Division and its technical committees, but it welcomes contributions from all areas of design with emphasis on synthesis. JMD communicates original contributions, primarily in the form of research articles of considerable depth, but also technical briefs, design innovation papers, book reviews, and editorials.
Scope: The Journal of Mechanical Design (JMD) serves the broad design community as the venue for scholarly, archival research in all aspects of the design activity with emphasis on design synthesis. JMD has traditionally served the ASME Design Engineering Division and its technical committees, but it welcomes contributions from all areas of design with emphasis on synthesis. JMD communicates original contributions, primarily in the form of research articles of considerable depth, but also technical briefs, design innovation papers, book reviews, and editorials.