Derailment risk: A systems analysis that identifies risks which could derail the sustainability transition

Laurie Laybourn, Joseph Evans, James Dyke
{"title":"Derailment risk: A systems analysis that identifies risks which could derail the sustainability transition","authors":"Laurie Laybourn, Joseph Evans, James Dyke","doi":"10.5194/esd-14-1171-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The consequences of climate change, nature loss, and other changes to the Earth system will impact societies' ability to tackle the causes of these problems. There are extensive agendas of study and action on the risks resulting from changes in the Earth system. These consider the failure to realise rapid sustainability transitions to date (“physical risk”) and the risks resulting from these transitions going forward (“transition risk”). Yet there is no established agenda on the risks to sustainability transitions from both physical and transition risks and their knock-on consequences. In response, we develop a conceptual socio-ecological systems model that explores how the escalating consequences of changes in the Earth system impacts the ability of societies to undertake work on environmental action that, in turn, re-stabilises natural systems. On one hand, these consequences can spur processes of political, economic, and social change that could accelerate the growth in work done, as societies respond constructively to tackle the causes of a less stable world. Conversely, escalating demands to manage increasingly chaotic conditions could divert work and political support from environmental action, deepening changes in the Earth system. If the latter dynamic dominates over the former, the chance is increased of passing a planetary threshold over which human agency to re-stabilise the natural world is severely impaired. We term this “derailment risk”: the risk that the journey to bring the world back into a safe operating space is derailed by interacting biophysical and socio-economic factors. We use a case study of a climate tipping element – the collapse of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) – to illustrate derailment risk. A range of policy responses can identify and mitigate derailment risk, including transformational adaptation. Acting on derailment risk is a critical requirement for accelerating the re-stabilisation of Earth system elements and avoiding catastrophic outcomes.","PeriodicalId":11466,"journal":{"name":"Earth System Dynamics Discussions","volume":"29 24","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth System Dynamics Discussions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-1171-2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. The consequences of climate change, nature loss, and other changes to the Earth system will impact societies' ability to tackle the causes of these problems. There are extensive agendas of study and action on the risks resulting from changes in the Earth system. These consider the failure to realise rapid sustainability transitions to date (“physical risk”) and the risks resulting from these transitions going forward (“transition risk”). Yet there is no established agenda on the risks to sustainability transitions from both physical and transition risks and their knock-on consequences. In response, we develop a conceptual socio-ecological systems model that explores how the escalating consequences of changes in the Earth system impacts the ability of societies to undertake work on environmental action that, in turn, re-stabilises natural systems. On one hand, these consequences can spur processes of political, economic, and social change that could accelerate the growth in work done, as societies respond constructively to tackle the causes of a less stable world. Conversely, escalating demands to manage increasingly chaotic conditions could divert work and political support from environmental action, deepening changes in the Earth system. If the latter dynamic dominates over the former, the chance is increased of passing a planetary threshold over which human agency to re-stabilise the natural world is severely impaired. We term this “derailment risk”: the risk that the journey to bring the world back into a safe operating space is derailed by interacting biophysical and socio-economic factors. We use a case study of a climate tipping element – the collapse of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) – to illustrate derailment risk. A range of policy responses can identify and mitigate derailment risk, including transformational adaptation. Acting on derailment risk is a critical requirement for accelerating the re-stabilisation of Earth system elements and avoiding catastrophic outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脱轨风险:识别可能使可持续转型脱轨的风险的系统分析
摘要气候变化、自然丧失和地球系统其他变化的后果将影响社会解决这些问题根源的能力。关于地球系统变化所带来的风险,有广泛的研究和行动议程。这些风险考虑了迄今为止未能实现快速可持续性转型(“物理风险”)以及这些转型所带来的风险(“转型风险”)。然而,对于可持续性转型所面临的物理风险和转型风险及其连带后果,目前尚无既定议程。作为回应,我们开发了一个概念性的社会生态系统模型,该模型探讨了地球系统变化的不断升级的后果如何影响社会开展环境行动的能力,而环境行动反过来又重新稳定了自然系统。一方面,这些后果可以刺激政治、经济和社会变革的进程,从而加速已完成工作的增长,因为社会会建设性地应对造成世界不稳定的原因。相反,管理日益混乱的环境的需求不断升级,可能会转移环境行动的工作和政治支持,从而加深地球系统的变化。如果后一种动力压倒了前者,那么人类重新稳定自然世界的能力就会受到严重损害,跨越一个地球门槛的可能性就会增加。我们称之为“脱轨风险”:将世界带回安全运行空间的旅程因相互作用的生物物理和社会经济因素而脱轨的风险。我们用一个气候引爆因素的案例研究——大西洋经向翻转环流(AMOC)的崩溃——来说明脱轨的风险。一系列政策应对措施可以识别和减轻脱轨风险,包括转型适应。对脱轨风险采取行动是加速地球系统要素重新稳定和避免灾难性后果的关键要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ESD Ideas: Arctic amplification's contribution to breaches of the Paris Agreement Derailment risk: A systems analysis that identifies risks which could derail the sustainability transition Nonlinear time series analysis of coastal temperatures and El Niño–Southern Oscillation events in the eastern South Pacific MIROC6 Large Ensemble (MIROC6-LE): experimental design and initial analyses A quantitative assessment of air–sea heat flux trends from ERA5 since 1950 in the North Atlantic basin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1