A quantitative assessment of air–sea heat flux trends from ERA5 since 1950 in the North Atlantic basin

Johannes Mayer, Leopold Haimberger, Michael Mayer
{"title":"A quantitative assessment of air–sea heat flux trends from ERA5 since 1950 in the North Atlantic basin","authors":"Johannes Mayer, Leopold Haimberger, Michael Mayer","doi":"10.5194/esd-14-1085-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. This work aims to investigate the temporal stability and reliability of trends in air–sea heat fluxes from ERA5 forecasts over the North Atlantic basin for the period 1950–2019. Driving forces of the trends are investigated using analyzed state quantities from ERA5. Estimating trends from reanalysis data can be challenging as changes in the observing system may introduce temporal inconsistencies. To this end, the impact of analysis increments is discussed. For individual sub-regions in the North Atlantic basin, parametrization formulas for latent and sensible heat fluxes are linearized to quantitatively attribute trends to long-term changes in wind speed, moisture, and temperature. Our results suggest good temporal stability and reliability of air–sea heat fluxes from ERA5 forecasts on sub-basin scales and below. Regional averages show that trends are largely driven by changes in the skin temperature and atmospheric advection (e.g., of warmer or drier air masses). The influence of modes of climate variability, such as the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) and Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation, on the patterns found is discussed as well. Results indicate a significant impact on trends in the Irminger and Labrador seas associated with more positive NAO phases during the past 4 decades. Finally, we use basin-wide trends of air–sea heat fluxes in combination with an observational ocean heat content estimate to provide an energy-budget-based trend estimate of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC). A decrease in area-averaged air–sea heat fluxes in the North Atlantic basin suggests a decline in the AMOC over the study period. However, basin-wide flux trends are deemed partially artificial, as indicated by temporally varying moisture increments. Thus, the exact magnitude of change is uncertain, but its sign appears robust and adds complementary evidence that the AMOC has weakened over the past 70 years.","PeriodicalId":11466,"journal":{"name":"Earth System Dynamics Discussions","volume":"69 11","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth System Dynamics Discussions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-1085-2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. This work aims to investigate the temporal stability and reliability of trends in air–sea heat fluxes from ERA5 forecasts over the North Atlantic basin for the period 1950–2019. Driving forces of the trends are investigated using analyzed state quantities from ERA5. Estimating trends from reanalysis data can be challenging as changes in the observing system may introduce temporal inconsistencies. To this end, the impact of analysis increments is discussed. For individual sub-regions in the North Atlantic basin, parametrization formulas for latent and sensible heat fluxes are linearized to quantitatively attribute trends to long-term changes in wind speed, moisture, and temperature. Our results suggest good temporal stability and reliability of air–sea heat fluxes from ERA5 forecasts on sub-basin scales and below. Regional averages show that trends are largely driven by changes in the skin temperature and atmospheric advection (e.g., of warmer or drier air masses). The influence of modes of climate variability, such as the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) and Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation, on the patterns found is discussed as well. Results indicate a significant impact on trends in the Irminger and Labrador seas associated with more positive NAO phases during the past 4 decades. Finally, we use basin-wide trends of air–sea heat fluxes in combination with an observational ocean heat content estimate to provide an energy-budget-based trend estimate of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC). A decrease in area-averaged air–sea heat fluxes in the North Atlantic basin suggests a decline in the AMOC over the study period. However, basin-wide flux trends are deemed partially artificial, as indicated by temporally varying moisture increments. Thus, the exact magnitude of change is uncertain, but its sign appears robust and adds complementary evidence that the AMOC has weakened over the past 70 years.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1950年以来来自ERA5的北大西洋海气热通量趋势的定量评估
摘要这项工作旨在研究1950-2019年期间北大西洋盆地ERA5预报的海气热通量趋势的时间稳定性和可靠性。利用ERA5分析的状态量对趋势的驱动力进行了研究。根据再分析数据估计趋势可能具有挑战性,因为观测系统的变化可能导致时间不一致。为此,讨论了分析增量的影响。对于北大西洋盆地的个别子区域,潜热通量和感热通量的参数化公式被线性化,以定量地将趋势归因于风速、湿度和温度的长期变化。结果表明,ERA5在次盆地及以下尺度上的海气热通量预报具有良好的时间稳定性和可靠性。区域平均值表明,趋势主要是由皮肤温度和大气平流(如暖气团或干燥气团)的变化驱动的。讨论了北大西洋涛动(NAO)和大西洋多年代际涛动等气候变率模态对这些模式的影响。结果表明,在过去的40年里,厄尔明格和拉布拉多海的趋势与更多的NAO正相位有关。最后,我们利用海气热通量的全流域趋势,结合海洋热含量的观测估计,提供了一个基于能量收支的大西洋经向翻转环流(AMOC)趋势估计。北大西洋盆地面积平均海气热通量的减少表明在研究期间AMOC下降。然而,整个流域的通量趋势被认为是部分人为的,正如时间变化的湿度增量所表明的那样。因此,变化的确切幅度是不确定的,但它的迹象似乎很明显,并补充了AMOC在过去70年里减弱的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ESD Ideas: Arctic amplification's contribution to breaches of the Paris Agreement Derailment risk: A systems analysis that identifies risks which could derail the sustainability transition Nonlinear time series analysis of coastal temperatures and El Niño–Southern Oscillation events in the eastern South Pacific MIROC6 Large Ensemble (MIROC6-LE): experimental design and initial analyses A quantitative assessment of air–sea heat flux trends from ERA5 since 1950 in the North Atlantic basin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1