Determination of the Explosion Hazard of Liquefied Natural Gas

I.A. Teterin, P.S. Kopylov, V.A. Sulimenko, S.N. Kopylov
{"title":"Determination of the Explosion Hazard of Liquefied Natural Gas","authors":"I.A. Teterin, P.S. Kopylov, V.A. Sulimenko, S.N. Kopylov","doi":"10.24000/0409-2961-2023-8-70-76","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Excess explosion pressure is one of the main indicators characterizing the explosiveness of a gas. Precise determination of the dependence of the explosion pressure on the distance allows to ensure the safe layout of production facilities with minimal economic costs. Every year, all over the world and in Russia in particular, there is an increase in energy consumption. There is a shift in the global energy system towards the large-scale use of low-carbon energy sources, which is caused by the policy of decarbonization of the fuel and energy complex as part of the fight against global warming. The advantage of operating natural gas in a liquefied state led to the development of the liquefied natural gas market in Russia, with the development of which the risk of accidents at the facilities in this segment of the economy increases. However, the existing methods do not allow calculating the explosion pressure for a mixture of low molecular weight hydrocarbons, which is liquefied natural gas. A new formula for calculating the explosion pressure is proposed considering the composition of the liquefied natural gas. The conducted studies showed the possibility of using the proposed formula to determine the parameters of the explosion of mixtures of low molecular weight hydrocarbons, in particular, liquefied natural gas. It is shown that, despite the linear dependence of the change in the maximum explosion pressure of methane on the change in the percentage of impurities of its homologues, the expected composition of the mixture components differs from that calculated according to the Le Chatelier rule, which can be taken into account in further studies. A comparative analysis of the explosion pressure according to the proposed methodology and the standard showed deviations for grades V, B, and A were 34.99; 20.45; and 2.1%, respectively, which significantly reduces the possible consequences of the explosion and creates a significant error in determining the safe distance. In order to exclude the possibility of obtaining underestimated indicators of the explosion pressure of the liquefied natural gas, it is recommended to use an adjusted methodology.","PeriodicalId":35650,"journal":{"name":"Bezopasnost'' Truda v Promyshlennosti","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bezopasnost'' Truda v Promyshlennosti","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24000/0409-2961-2023-8-70-76","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Excess explosion pressure is one of the main indicators characterizing the explosiveness of a gas. Precise determination of the dependence of the explosion pressure on the distance allows to ensure the safe layout of production facilities with minimal economic costs. Every year, all over the world and in Russia in particular, there is an increase in energy consumption. There is a shift in the global energy system towards the large-scale use of low-carbon energy sources, which is caused by the policy of decarbonization of the fuel and energy complex as part of the fight against global warming. The advantage of operating natural gas in a liquefied state led to the development of the liquefied natural gas market in Russia, with the development of which the risk of accidents at the facilities in this segment of the economy increases. However, the existing methods do not allow calculating the explosion pressure for a mixture of low molecular weight hydrocarbons, which is liquefied natural gas. A new formula for calculating the explosion pressure is proposed considering the composition of the liquefied natural gas. The conducted studies showed the possibility of using the proposed formula to determine the parameters of the explosion of mixtures of low molecular weight hydrocarbons, in particular, liquefied natural gas. It is shown that, despite the linear dependence of the change in the maximum explosion pressure of methane on the change in the percentage of impurities of its homologues, the expected composition of the mixture components differs from that calculated according to the Le Chatelier rule, which can be taken into account in further studies. A comparative analysis of the explosion pressure according to the proposed methodology and the standard showed deviations for grades V, B, and A were 34.99; 20.45; and 2.1%, respectively, which significantly reduces the possible consequences of the explosion and creates a significant error in determining the safe distance. In order to exclude the possibility of obtaining underestimated indicators of the explosion pressure of the liquefied natural gas, it is recommended to use an adjusted methodology.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
液化天然气爆炸危险性的测定
超爆压力是表征气体爆炸性的主要指标之一。精确确定爆炸压力对距离的依赖关系,可以以最小的经济成本确保生产设施的安全布局。每年,在世界各地,特别是在俄罗斯,能源消耗都在增加。全球能源系统正朝着大规模使用低碳能源的方向转变,这是由作为对抗全球变暖的一部分的燃料和能源综合体脱碳政策造成的。在液化状态下运营天然气的优势导致了俄罗斯液化天然气市场的发展,随着液化天然气市场的发展,这一经济领域的设施发生事故的风险也在增加。然而,现有的方法不允许计算低分子量碳氢化合物混合物(即液化天然气)的爆炸压力。考虑到液化天然气的组成,提出了一种新的爆炸压力计算公式。所进行的研究表明,可以使用所提出的公式来确定低分子量碳氢化合物混合物,特别是液化天然气的爆炸参数。结果表明,尽管甲烷最大爆炸压力的变化与其同系物杂质百分比的变化呈线性关系,但混合组分的预期组成与根据勒夏特列规则计算的不同,可以在进一步的研究中考虑到这一点。根据所提出的方法和标准对爆炸压力进行了对比分析,结果表明,V级、B级和A级的偏差为34.99;20.45;和2.1%,这大大降低了爆炸的可能后果,并在确定安全距离时产生了重大误差。为了排除低估液化天然气爆炸压力指标的可能性,建议采用调整后的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bezopasnost'' Truda v Promyshlennosti
Bezopasnost'' Truda v Promyshlennosti Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
110
期刊最新文献
Analytical Methodology for Substantiating the Optimal Frequency of Scheduled Inspections of the Fire-fighting Condition of Industrial and Warehouse Buildings Increasing Geodynamic Safety by Managing Induced Seismicity During the Development of Solid Mineral Deposits Critique and Improvement of the Regulatory Framework on the Calculation of Structures for Seismic Impacts On the Problem of the Large Tires Safe Operation Improving the Labor Safety of Mining Dump Truck Drivers by Reducing the Risk of Failure of the Functional Units of the Traction Electric Drive under Operating Conditions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1